H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Marius Copil vs Bradley Klahn H2H: 0-2
Bradley Klahn holds a 2–0 lead over Marius Copil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bradley Klahn leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bradley Klahn won the 2019 Atlanta third round 7-6(3) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 35
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 35
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2019* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Bradley Klahn | 7-6(3) 7-5 | Marius Copil | Match data |
| Oct 18, 2018* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Bradley Klahn | 6-2 3-6 6-4 | Marius Copil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marius Copil | #1,021 | #56 | 888 | 1,811 | 47 | 81 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bradley Klahn | #1,096 | #63 | 731 | 1,733 | 13 | 43 | 23.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marius Copil | Bradley Klahn | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #467 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #798 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #669 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #248 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #147 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #97 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #148 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #165 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2017 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2018 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,809 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2019 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #153 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #374 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #873 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #877 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |