H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Marius Copil vs Matthew Ebden H2H: 0-1

Matthew Ebden holds a 1–0 lead over Marius Copil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Matthew Ebden leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Matthew Ebden won the 2018 Libéma Open quarterfinal 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marius Copil
ROU Age 35 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Matthew Ebden
AUS Age 38 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Matthew Ebden #69 6-3 6-3 Marius Copil #97 Match data Jun 16, 2018* QF Libéma Open ATP 250 Grass
Marius Copil #221 7-6(1) 6-4 Matthew Ebden #61 Match data Oct 7, 2012 Q1 Q Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marius Copil #1,021 #56 888 1,810 47 81 36.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Matthew Ebden #970 #39 1,134 1,849 75 129 36.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marius Copil Matthew Ebden
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2009 1–1 50.0% #467 1,444 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2010 0–1 0.0% #291 1,465 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2011 1–2 33.3% #217 1,553 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2012 3–3 50.0% #160 1,641 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2013 1–5 16.7% #147 1,612 0 0 2010 1–2 33.3% #196 1,526 0 0
23 2014 6–6 50.0% #172 1,696 0 0 2011 10–10 50.0% #86 1,762 0 0
24 2015 3–5 37.5% #165 1,677 0 0 2012 15–23 39.5% #105 1,644 0 0
25 2016 3–4 42.9% #132 1,737 0 0 2013 4–11 26.7% #68 1,634 0 0
26 2017 7–14 33.3% #93 1,674 0 0 2014 5–21 19.2% #231 1,539 0 0
27 2018 15–20 42.9% #60 1,808 0 0 2015 1–6 14.3% #105 1,631 0 0
28 2019 7–19 26.9% #153 1,706 0 0 2016 0–4 0.0% #698 1,573 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2017 9–7 56.2% #76 1,739 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2018 19–22 46.3% #46 1,790 0 0
31 2022 0–1 0.0% #374 1,569 0 0 2019 5–16 23.8% #244 1,654 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2021 6–5 54.5% #237 1,591 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2022 0–1 0.0% #740 1,527 0 0
36 — — — — — — — 2024 0–1 0.0% — 1,526 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marius Copil Matthew Ebden
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2009 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2013 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2010 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
23 2014 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
24 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2012 14 16 30 46.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
25 2016 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2017 5 8 13 38.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 4 12 16 25.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 2018 12 12 24 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2015 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2019 7 15 22 31.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 12 16 28 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
31 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 3 9 12 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 34 48 82 41.5% 7 24 31 22.6% 6 9 15 40.0% — 55 89 144 38.2% 1 14 15 6.7% 19 26 45 42.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marius Copil Matthew Ebden
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2009 2/2 7.0 4.5 48.8% 77.1% 50.6% 64.3% 41.1% 63.5% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 1/1 4.0 3.0 50.0% 65.1% 39.5% 69.2% 75.0% 52.3% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 3/3 7.3 1.7 57.7% 72.6% 48.2% 39.3% 17.4% 62.7% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 6/6 10.8 1.8 61.8% 77.3% 52.3% 71.7% 37.0% 67.6% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2013 6/6 9.0 3.3 56.8% 71.1% 49.4% 60.6% 21.7% 61.7% 28.3% 2010 3/3 6.3 1.0 66.7% 72.6% 58.1% 64.3% 61.7% 67.6% 31.2%
23 2014 12/12 10.5 2.0 61.0% 74.0% 52.1% 73.0% 20.2% 64.9% 31.6% 2011 20/20 5.8 2.7 61.6% 72.0% 47.9% 47.2% 36.9% 63.0% 35.9%
24 2015 8/8 12.6 3.1 55.1% 75.8% 53.4% 65.9% 41.6% 65.9% 32.6% 2012 38/38 5.4 4.1 62.3% 68.9% 44.8% 52.5% 33.0% 59.8% 34.5%
25 2016 7/7 9.6 3.4 58.2% 73.3% 55.7% 43.4% 62.7% 65.6% 36.0% 2013 15/15 5.6 5.7 56.5% 73.1% 45.0% 50.4% 30.9% 61.0% 34.2%
26 2017 21/21 10.0 3.5 56.1% 76.0% 51.6% 57.5% 35.5% 65.2% 31.5% 2014 26/26 4.4 6.2 57.7% 68.5% 39.2% 44.0% 37.7% 55.6% 32.2%
27 2018 35/35 12.8 3.3 58.9% 77.6% 55.1% 60.6% 37.3% 68.0% 32.3% 2015 7/7 7.1 5.0 58.8% 71.7% 51.1% 63.2% 44.0% 62.9% 32.2%
28 2019 26/26 11.3 3.4 57.2% 73.3% 48.8% 56.4% 35.6% 62.9% 30.3% 2016 4/4 2.8 3.8 53.6% 51.5% 39.7% 44.0% 45.5% 46.2% 25.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 16/16 4.7 4.4 64.7% 71.6% 47.8% 54.0% 39.3% 63.1% 38.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 41/41 7.5 5.3 59.7% 72.5% 50.1% 59.9% 42.6% 63.3% 35.2%
31 2022 1/1 11.0 2.0 62.8% 76.3% 57.1% 50.0% 0.0% 69.1% 26.3% 2019 21/21 7.0 6.0 59.8% 71.7% 42.0% 54.0% 46.1% 59.9% 35.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 11/11 4.3 3.3 62.6% 71.7% 48.9% 64.3% 49.0% 62.5% 34.1%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 1/1 5.0 3.0 69.2% 83.3% 54.2% 0.0% 50.0% 74.4% 27.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marius Copil Matthew Ebden
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2007 1483 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 1460 99.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 1444 105.1 -0.74 -2.41 1.162 53.2% — — — 60.0% +0.60 0–1 1–0 — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 1466 107.9 -1.19 -1.58 0.779 45.5% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.14 2007 1500 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 1554 115.1 +0.38 -3.10 0.938 47.4% — — — 33.3% -0.83 — 0–1 — +0.06 2008 1486 97.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 1641 121.6 +2.57 -0.78 1.093 51.3% -2 — — 50.0% +0.07 1–1 1–1 — -0.32 2009 1490 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2013 1613 118.9 -0.92 -2.99 0.739 45.9% — — — 21.4% -1.43 1–1 0–1 — -0.16 2010 1526 117.9 +1.93 +0.66 0.965 49.8% +20 — — 28.6% -0.57 — — — -0.49
23 2014 1696 129.0 +0.87 -2.43 0.901 48.2% +34 -125 — 48.1% -0.26 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.33 2011 1762 127.8 +1.26 -1.35 0.971 49.6% -32 — -47 44.4% -0.42 4–1 (80%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.59
24 2015 1678 122.4 +0.84 -1.99 0.956 49.4% +42 — -45 42.9% -0.19 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.66 2012 1645 128.5 -2.57 -1.66 0.858 47.3% +15 -179 +28 39.8% -0.69 9–5 (64%) 8–4 (67%) — -0.07
25 2016 1737 124.6 +1.66 -1.66 1.047 50.6% +26 — — 50.0% -0.35 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — -0.30 2013 1635 122.7 -1.51 -1.64 0.876 47.9% +18 — — 31.6% -1.24 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.71
26 2017 1674 138.4 +1.25 -2.84 0.905 48.3% +64 -66 — 37.0% -0.76 3–4 (43%) 8–8 (50%) — +0.06 2014 1540 122.0 -6.43 -2.74 0.726 44.3% +30 -112 +36 26.2% -1.63 3–4 (43%) 1–5 (17%) — -0.48
27 2018 1809 146.2 +2.98 -2.62 1.009 50.1% +33 -205 -181 48.2% -0.07 3–9 (25%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.13 2015 1631 122.0 -2.35 -0.31 0.869 48.1% -24 — +48 30.0% -0.35 0–3 (0%) 0–6 (0%) — +0.22
28 2019 1706 138.7 -0.25 -4.35 0.816 47.1% +48 -145 — 35.1% -1.07 5–7 (42%) 8–5 (62%) — -1.18 2016 1573 113.0 -4.76 -3.67 0.476 37.3% -25 — — 12.5% -3.13 — — — +0.28
29 2020 1665 94.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1739 127.4 -1.27 +2.03 1.034 50.6% -69 — +46 50.0% +0.21 5–1 (83%) 2–5 (29%) — +1.33
30 2021 1582 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1791 148.3 -0.68 +0.04 0.958 49.3% -42 — +64 47.1% -0.21 6–6 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.04
31 2022 1570 106.2 -3.65 +1.03 0.851 47.2% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.07 2019 1654 126.9 -3.44 +0.06 0.888 47.9% +33 — +98 33.3% -0.87 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.35
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1631 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 1557 97.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1592 115.4 +0.31 -1.06 0.910 49.0% +57 — — 61.9% +0.67 2–1 (67%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.15
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1527 96.8 -2.43 +2.78 1.068 50.0% — — — 0.0% -1.00 — 0–2 — +0.25
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1527 107.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.17
Career — 1811 134.7 +1.23 -2.80 0.926 48.8% +41 -127 -136 41.5% -0.53 17–30 (36%) 39–34 (53%) 101.1 -2.13 — 1849 131.9 -2.03 -0.86 0.881 47.9% -1 -137 +45 39.0% -0.67 33–31 (52%) 29–43 (40%) 97.8 +0.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.