H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Marius Copil vs Tobias Kamke H2H: 1-0

Marius Copil holds a 1–0 lead over Tobias Kamke in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marius Copil leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marius Copil won the 2012 Tiriac Open round of 32 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marius Copil
ROU Age 35 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Tobias Kamke
GER Age 40 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marius Copil #130 6-7(1) 7-6(3) 6-1 Tobias Kamke #122 Match data Feb 13, 2017 Q1 Q ABN AMRO Open ATP 500 Hard
Marius Copil #258 6-3 6-2 Tobias Kamke #83 Match data Apr 26, 2012* R32 Tiriac Open ATP 250 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marius Copil #1,021 #56 888 1,810 47 81 36.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tobias Kamke #1,114 #64 744 1,766 62 101 38.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marius Copil Tobias Kamke
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2009 1–1 50.0% #467 1,444 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2010 0–1 0.0% #291 1,465 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2011 1–2 33.3% #217 1,553 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2012 3–3 50.0% #160 1,641 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #210 1,502 0 0
22 2013 1–5 16.7% #147 1,612 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #243 1,508 0 0
23 2014 6–6 50.0% #172 1,696 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2015 3–5 37.5% #165 1,677 0 0 2010 7–8 46.7% #67 1,639 0 0
25 2016 3–4 42.9% #132 1,737 0 0 2011 15–23 39.5% #96 1,738 0 0
26 2017 7–14 33.3% #93 1,674 0 0 2012 6–18 25.0% #98 1,628 0 0
27 2018 15–20 42.9% #60 1,808 0 0 2013 17–21 44.7% #74 1,731 0 0
28 2019 7–19 26.9% #153 1,706 0 0 2014 9–16 36.0% #97 1,669 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2015 1–5 16.7% #277 1,583 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2016 5–5 50.0% #118 1,707 0 0
31 2022 0–1 0.0% #374 1,569 0 0 2017 2–2 50.0% #233 1,617 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2019 0–1 0.0% #242 1,566 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marius Copil Tobias Kamke
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2009 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2013 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2014 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2010 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 2016 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 7 14 21 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6%
26 2017 5 8 13 38.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 5 11 16 31.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2018 12 12 24 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2013 10 11 21 47.6% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2019 7 15 22 31.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 4 10 14 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 34 48 82 41.5% 7 24 31 22.6% 6 9 15 40.0% — 35 61 96 36.5% 16 27 43 37.2% 11 13 24 45.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marius Copil Tobias Kamke
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2009 2/2 7.0 4.5 48.8% 77.1% 50.6% 64.3% 41.1% 63.5% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 1/1 4.0 3.0 50.0% 65.1% 39.5% 69.2% 75.0% 52.3% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 3/3 7.3 1.7 57.7% 72.6% 48.2% 39.3% 17.4% 62.7% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 6/6 10.8 1.8 61.8% 77.3% 52.3% 71.7% 37.0% 67.6% 35.5% 2007 1/1 0.0 6.0 47.2% 56.0% 35.7% 16.7% — 45.3% 17.6%
22 2013 6/6 9.0 3.3 56.8% 71.1% 49.4% 60.6% 21.7% 61.7% 28.3% 2008 1/1 3.0 11.0 58.3% 64.9% 45.3% 25.0% 33.3% 56.7% 30.1%
23 2014 12/12 10.5 2.0 61.0% 74.0% 52.1% 73.0% 20.2% 64.9% 31.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2015 8/8 12.6 3.1 55.1% 75.8% 53.4% 65.9% 41.6% 65.9% 32.6% 2010 15/15 1.8 3.3 59.0% 65.8% 48.0% 56.5% 35.6% 58.8% 39.1%
25 2016 7/7 9.6 3.4 58.2% 73.3% 55.7% 43.4% 62.7% 65.6% 36.0% 2011 38/38 2.3 3.5 57.2% 65.9% 50.9% 55.5% 39.3% 59.5% 38.5%
26 2017 21/21 10.0 3.5 56.1% 76.0% 51.6% 57.5% 35.5% 65.2% 31.5% 2012 24/24 1.4 4.6 57.4% 61.6% 45.8% 47.2% 39.2% 54.8% 40.4%
27 2018 35/35 12.8 3.3 58.9% 77.6% 55.1% 60.6% 37.3% 68.0% 32.3% 2013 38/38 2.2 2.6 60.4% 66.9% 49.5% 60.7% 46.9% 60.0% 39.2%
28 2019 26/26 11.3 3.4 57.2% 73.3% 48.8% 56.4% 35.6% 62.9% 30.3% 2014 25/25 2.4 3.3 61.0% 66.2% 51.7% 60.8% 36.4% 60.4% 34.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 6/6 2.2 2.5 56.5% 61.9% 46.0% 38.6% 45.4% 54.5% 37.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 10/10 1.0 3.1 61.2% 64.4% 50.3% 45.7% 44.5% 58.8% 39.3%
31 2022 1/1 11.0 2.0 62.8% 76.3% 57.1% 50.0% 0.0% 69.1% 26.3% 2017 4/4 2.3 3.5 57.0% 73.4% 51.3% 60.9% 58.5% 64.2% 39.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 1/1 0.0 8.0 46.4% 66.7% 44.1% 60.0% 33.3% 54.5% 29.6%
Career — 128/128 11.1 3.1 57.8% 75.2% 52.2% 59.8% 35.6% 65.3% 32.1% — 163/163 2.0 3.4 58.8% 65.4% 49.3% 54.9% 41.0% 58.7% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marius Copil Tobias Kamke
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2007 1483 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 1460 99.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 1444 105.1 -0.74 -2.41 1.162 53.2% — — — 60.0% +0.60 0–1 1–0 — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 1466 107.9 -1.19 -1.58 0.779 45.5% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 1554 115.1 +0.38 -3.10 0.938 47.4% — — — 33.3% -0.83 — 0–1 — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 1641 121.6 +2.57 -0.78 1.093 51.3% -2 — — 50.0% +0.07 1–1 1–1 — -0.32 2007 1502 102.7 +1.52 -1.81 0.323 34.5% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.07
22 2013 1613 118.9 -0.92 -2.99 0.739 45.9% — — — 21.4% -1.43 1–1 0–1 — -0.16 2008 1509 105.8 +1.11 -1.95 0.695 44.2% — — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.07
23 2014 1696 129.0 +0.87 -2.43 0.901 48.2% +34 -125 — 48.1% -0.26 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 102.3 -0.33 2009 1457 96.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2015 1678 122.4 +0.84 -1.99 0.956 49.4% +42 — -45 42.9% -0.19 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.8 -0.66 2010 1639 126.8 -1.68 +1.56 0.949 48.8% -130 -61 +94 46.3% -0.29 1–1 0–1 — -0.29
25 2016 1737 124.6 +1.66 -1.66 1.047 50.6% +26 — — 50.0% -0.35 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — -0.30 2011 1738 134.7 -2.56 +1.09 0.951 49.1% -78 -127 +18 42.4% -0.27 1–8 (11%) 3–9 (25%) 89.6 +0.04
26 2017 1674 138.4 +1.25 -2.84 0.905 48.3% +64 -66 — 37.0% -0.76 3–4 (43%) 8–8 (50%) 100.4 +0.06 2012 1629 130.3 -5.44 +2.38 0.893 47.6% -3 -69 — 33.9% -1.11 1–6 (14%) 1–4 (20%) 91.7 -0.37
27 2018 1809 146.2 +2.98 -2.62 1.009 50.1% +33 -205 -181 48.2% -0.07 3–9 (25%) 14–11 (56%) 99.8 -0.13 2013 1731 143.6 -2.58 +2.05 0.978 50.0% +2 -95 -37 48.9% +0.08 4–6 (40%) 6–3 (67%) 102.2 -0.29
28 2019 1706 138.7 -0.25 -4.35 0.816 47.1% +48 -145 — 35.1% -1.07 5–7 (42%) 8–5 (62%) 102.2 -1.18 2014 1669 132.2 -3.08 -1.17 0.873 48.0% -24 -5 +60 42.6% -0.69 3–7 (30%) 6–5 (55%) 99.9 +0.69
29 2020 1665 94.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1583 117.3 -3.20 +0.43 0.825 46.0% -7 — — 25.0% -1.69 1–1 1–1 — -0.03
30 2021 1582 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1707 126.4 -2.95 +1.32 0.953 49.2% -8 — — 47.8% -0.17 1–0 3–3 (50%) — +0.76
31 2022 1570 106.2 -3.65 +1.03 0.851 47.2% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.07 2017 1618 113.4 +0.68 +0.45 1.108 51.9% — — +97 55.6% +0.33 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.10
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1543 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 1557 97.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1567 110.3 -0.77 -0.97 0.651 42.8% — — — 25.0% -2.25 — — — -0.04
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1532 92.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1492 104.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1515 104.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1811 134.7 +1.23 -2.80 0.926 48.8% +41 -127 -136 41.5% -0.53 17–30 (36%) 39–34 (53%) 101.1 -2.13 — 1766 131.0 -2.90 +1.13 0.926 48.7% -32 -76 +38 42.4% -0.48 12–30 (29%) 21–28 (43%) 91.3 +0.26

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.