H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Marius Copil vs Tobias Kamke H2H: 1-0
Marius Copil holds a 1–0 lead over Tobias Kamke in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marius Copil leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marius Copil won the 2012 Bucharest third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 35
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 40
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2017 | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | Q1 | Hard | Marius Copil | 6-7(1) 7-6(3) 6-1 | Tobias Kamke | Match data |
| Apr 26, 2012* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Marius Copil | 6-3 6-2 | Tobias Kamke | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marius Copil | #1,021 | #56 | 888 | 1,811 | 47 | 81 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tobias Kamke | #1,114 | #64 | 744 | 1,764 | 60 | 99 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marius Copil | Tobias Kamke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #467 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #147 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2015 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #165 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #96 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #98 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,809 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2019 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #153 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #97 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #277 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #374 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |