H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Marsel Ilhan vs Tobias Kamke H2H: 1-0
Marsel Ilhan holds a 1–0 lead over Tobias Kamke in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marsel Ilhan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marsel Ilhan won the 2011 Miami Masters first round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TUR
Age 39
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 40
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2015 | Queen's Club | ATP 500 | Q1 | Grass | Tobias Kamke | 6-3 6-4 | Marsel Ilhan | Match data |
| Mar 25, 2011* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Marsel Ilhan | 6-2 6-1 | Tobias Kamke | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marsel Ilhan | #1,764 | #77 | 657 | 1,754 | 20 | 54 | 27.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tobias Kamke | #1,114 | #64 | 744 | 1,764 | 60 | 99 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marsel Ilhan | Tobias Kamke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #155 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #111 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #96 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #98 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #104 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2015 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #114 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #97 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2016 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #246 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #277 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #324 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #543 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #755 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |