H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Martin Fischer vs Jimmy Wang

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Martin Fischer vs Jimmy Wang.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martin Fischer
AUT Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main-draw meetings
Jimmy Wang
TPE Age 41 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martin Fischer #358 6-2 6-4 Jimmy Wang #153 Match data Jun 8, 2015 Q1 Q Stuttgart Open ATP 250 Grass

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martin Fischer #1,005 #117 467 1,683 2 19 9.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jimmy Wang #1,017 #85 487 1,733 22 41 34.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martin Fischer Jimmy Wang
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2006 0–1 0.0% #438 1,497 0 0 2004 1–3 25.0% #184 1,510 0 0
20 2007 0–1 0.0% #264 1,471 0 0 2005 3–8 27.3% #100 1,514 0 0
21 2008 0–3 0.0% #216 1,518 0 0 2006 7–15 31.8% #148 1,554 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2007 3–2 60.0% #148 1,571 0 0
23 2010 1–3 25.0% #133 1,612 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2011 0–4 0.0% #219 1,612 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2012 1–3 25.0% #299 1,637 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2013 0–3 0.0% #192 1,643 0 0 2011 1–1 50.0% #274 1,545 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2012 2–3 40.0% #156 1,634 0 0
28 2015 0–1 0.0% #705 1,626 0 0 2013 1–3 25.0% #174 1,587 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2014 4–5 44.4% #124 1,698 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #310 1,676 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martin Fischer Jimmy Wang
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 4 9 13 30.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2012 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2015 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 0 6 6 0.0% 1 10 11 9.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — 13 25 38 34.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 13 22 40.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Martin Fischer Jimmy Wang
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2006 1/1 0.0 1.0 66.7% 54.3% 47.8% 50.0% 33.3% 52.2% 32.4% 2004 4/4 4.3 2.5 69.0% 67.1% 56.8% 66.1% 41.0% 63.5% 36.0%
20 2007 1/1 1.0 4.0 48.4% 60.9% 51.0% 37.5% 30.0% 55.8% 36.6% 2005 11/11 3.1 2.0 62.1% 66.7% 52.1% 51.8% 49.6% 61.1% 34.3%
21 2008 3/3 3.7 1.0 60.9% 54.6% 52.9% 46.3% 75.0% 53.5% 35.1% 2006 22/22 3.5 2.2 57.7% 62.4% 48.8% 60.9% 38.9% 56.4% 38.9%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 5/5 3.6 1.8 66.4% 70.2% 45.4% 63.6% 49.5% 61.8% 42.4%
23 2010 4/4 5.3 3.5 55.9% 71.1% 50.4% 46.6% 41.3% 61.7% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2011 4/4 2.5 1.8 66.6% 59.4% 44.8% 52.2% 39.6% 54.7% 32.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2012 4/4 2.0 3.3 50.2% 63.8% 55.6% 57.7% 56.2% 59.7% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2013 3/3 2.0 2.0 59.2% 53.8% 46.1% 33.9% 36.1% 50.4% 41.0% 2011 2/2 2.0 2.0 57.2% 64.5% 43.7% 54.4% 59.2% 55.7% 44.2%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 5/5 4.0 2.6 64.2% 64.3% 57.5% 65.2% 48.7% 62.1% 37.2%
28 2015 1/1 2.0 4.0 53.3% 63.2% 52.0% 75.0% 50.0% 57.9% 36.6% 2013 4/4 5.0 3.0 65.0% 62.3% 46.2% 46.9% 30.5% 56.9% 31.7%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 9/9 4.2 2.9 61.8% 66.1% 54.6% 53.7% 42.6% 61.4% 35.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 1/1 5.0 2.0 60.9% 68.7% 65.1% 71.4% 0.0% 67.3% 18.4%
Career — 21/21 2.8 2.5 58.1% 61.0% 50.0% 49.0% 47.4% 56.3% 36.6% — 63/63 3.7 2.3 61.5% 64.9% 51.1% 58.2% 42.5% 59.5% 36.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martin Fischer Jimmy Wang
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1504 101.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1488 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 1497 108.9 -0.21 +4.23 0.676 42.3% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.16 2004 1510 110.4 +0.26 +2.41 0.988 49.7% -9 — — 36.4% -0.36 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.34
20 2007 1472 97.7 -0.75 -2.03 0.829 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — 0.00 2005 1514 117.7 -2.25 +0.22 0.882 48.1% -13 — +76 33.3% -0.96 1–3 (25%) 4–4 (50%) 100.5 +0.04
21 2008 1519 108.0 -0.10 -0.96 0.756 44.8% — — — 0.0% -2.33 — 0–2 — +0.23 2006 1555 121.8 -2.71 +1.39 0.893 47.9% -39 -86 +41 35.2% -1.06 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 95.8 -0.81
22 2009 1495 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1571 112.6 -0.82 +0.23 1.110 52.1% -71 — — 56.3% +0.31 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.95
23 2010 1612 112.3 -0.88 -1.58 0.948 49.1% — — — 42.9% 0.00 0–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.26 2008 1484 94.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2011 1613 111.8 -4.94 -2.70 0.708 43.3% — — — 18.2% -1.91 0–2 1–1 — +0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2012 1637 118.4 -1.00 -0.19 0.998 50.7% — +37 — 40.0% -0.10 0–2 0–2 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2013 1644 121.1 -3.84 -0.12 0.827 45.3% — — — 14.3% -1.86 0–1 — — -0.11 2011 1545 113.4 -1.19 -0.36 0.998 50.3% — — — 40.0% 0.00 1–0 — — +0.06
27 2014 1599 113.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1634 117.0 +0.58 +0.84 0.981 49.4% -61 — — 40.0% 0.00 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.08
28 2015 1627 107.5 +0.68 -3.25 0.870 48.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.01 2013 1587 108.1 -2.19 -1.68 0.735 44.5% — — +213 30.8% -1.46 1–1 1–0 — +0.11
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1698 129.1 -2.74 -0.55 0.912 49.0% -83 — +191 44.0% -0.24 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.73
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1677 113.7 -5.13 +6.83 0.562 45.7% — — — 0.0% -1.67 — 0–1 — -0.18
Career — 1684 117.0 -1.88 -1.06 0.837 46.7% — +37 — 26.8% -1.09 0–8 (0%) 3–9 (25%) 87.6 +4.62 — 1734 122.3 -1.99 +0.67 0.911 48.5% -42 -86 +117 37.9% -0.66 6–13 (32%) 12–16 (43%) 95.9 +0.76

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.