H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Martin Jaite vs Ronald Agenor H2H: 3-1

Martin Jaite holds a 3–1 lead over Ronald Agenor in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Martin Jaite leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Martin Jaite won the 1990 Swiss Open Gstaad semifinal 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martin Jaite
ARG Age 61 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Ronald Agenor
HAI Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martin Jaite #10 7-5 6-1 Ronald Agenor #45 Match data Jul 14, 1990* SF Swiss Open Gstaad ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Martin Jaite #15 6-1 3-6 0-6 6-2 6-4 Ronald Agenor #58 Match data May 28, 1986* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Ronald Agenor #57 6-4 6-4 Martin Jaite #14 Match data May 14, 1986* R64 Italian Open ATP 500 Clay
Martin Jaite #19 6-2 6-4 Ronald Agenor #65 Match data Sep 27, 1985* R16 Barcelona Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martin Jaite #1,214 #10 1,226 1,965 275 158 63.5% 0 0 0 0 12 12
Ronald Agenor #1,507 #22 984 1,896 215 253 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martin Jaite Ronald Agenor
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1982 1–1 50.0% — 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1983 4–3 57.1% #285 1,546 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1984 11–8 57.9% #56 1,678 0 0 1984 0–2 0.0% #418 1,480 0 0
20 1985 37–17 68.5% #20 1,814 0 1 1985 17–14 54.8% #49 1,657 0 0
21 1986 34–15 69.4% #17 1,828 0 3 1986 20–22 47.6% #74 1,672 0 0
22 1987 43–17 71.7% #14 1,890 0 5 1987 25–20 55.6% #44 1,736 0 0
23 1988 25–20 55.6% #54 1,741 0 5 1988 24–18 57.1% #28 1,758 0 0
24 1989 46–14 76.7% #11 1,948 0 9 1989 24–17 58.5% #37 1,767 0 1
25 1990 31–19 62.0% #36 1,768 0 11 1990 33–25 56.9% #29 1,816 0 3
26 1991 24–21 53.3% #46 1,706 0 12 1991 16–27 37.2% #74 1,643 0 3
27 1992 18–19 48.6% #120 1,681 0 12 1992 5–16 23.8% #132 1,538 0 3
28 1993 1–4 20.0% #245 1,603 0 12 1993 17–25 40.5% #58 1,603 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 1994 15–23 39.5% #71 1,580 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 1995 8–12 40.0% #146 1,586 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 1996 0–5 0.0% #326 1,525 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 1998 1–1 50.0% #237 1,530 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 1999 3–7 30.0% #96 1,521 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2000 6–16 27.3% #137 1,430 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2001 1–3 25.0% #188 1,466 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martin Jaite Ronald Agenor
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1982 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 — — — — 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1985 5 4 9 55.6% 32 12 44 72.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 14 10 24 58.3% — — — — — — — —
21 1986 0 2 2 0.0% 33 12 45 73.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 17 14 31 54.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 1987 3 4 7 42.9% 40 12 52 76.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 18 12 30 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1988 11 6 17 64.7% 14 12 26 53.8% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
24 1989 7 3 10 70.0% 29 9 38 76.3% — — — — 10 2 12 83.3% 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 15 7 22 68.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
25 1990 11 6 17 64.7% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1990 5 8 13 38.5% 18 13 31 58.1% — — — — 10 4 14 71.4%
26 1991 5 7 12 41.7% 17 11 28 60.7% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — 6 10 16 37.5%
27 1992 9 7 16 56.3% 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — — — — — 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
28 1993 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 3 10 13 23.1% 12 11 23 52.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 3 7 10 30.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 2 6 8 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 39 90 56.7% 208 106 314 66.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 15 12 27 55.6% — 42 76 118 35.6% 138 130 268 51.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 32 41 73 43.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 78/87 of Martin Jaite's and 182/207 of Ronald Agenor's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Martin Jaite Ronald Agenor
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
26 1991 40/45 4.4 2.3 52.5% 70.7% 49.7% 53.9% 43.5% 61.0% 38.5% 1991 41/43 3.0 2.0 67.4% 63.9% 44.3% 45.2% 43.7% 57.1% 36.1%
27 1992 33/37 4.8 2.4 51.4% 68.9% 50.8% 51.3% 42.2% 59.8% 40.4% 1992 18/21 3.0 1.6 66.1% 60.7% 46.2% 52.1% 50.8% 55.7% 37.8%
28 1993 5/5 3.0 2.6 48.1% 65.3% 43.6% 36.3% 41.5% 54.3% 35.8% 1993 33/42 3.6 1.5 61.4% 65.9% 48.0% 55.0% 42.1% 59.0% 39.2%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 36/38 3.1 1.9 58.4% 66.4% 50.7% 56.8% 41.4% 59.8% 36.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 19/20 4.6 1.9 62.4% 65.9% 51.2% 58.9% 41.8% 60.2% 36.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 3/5 6.3 2.7 68.4% 63.8% 37.7% 44.5% 56.7% 55.4% 38.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 2/2 2.0 3.5 73.0% 64.0% 34.2% 42.3% 48.8% 55.9% 44.1%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 8/10 1.4 2.1 71.1% 62.3% 43.3% 55.5% 35.1% 57.4% 34.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 18/22 2.6 3.1 65.3% 62.1% 50.7% 49.4% 40.9% 58.3% 37.1%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 4/4 1.5 2.8 66.1% 64.1% 48.7% 55.8% 54.6% 59.0% 37.2%
Career — 78/433 4.5 2.4 51.8% 69.6% 49.8% 51.7% 42.8% 60.1% 39.1% — 182/468 3.2 2.0 63.9% 64.4% 47.6% 52.5% 43.3% 58.3% 37.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martin Jaite Ronald Agenor
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1982 1505 102.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.34 1–1 — — +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 1546 116.6 — — — — — +29 — 58.8% +0.18 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 1679 138.0 — — — — — +39 — 54.3% +0.20 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.05 1984 1481 105.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — +0.07
20 1985 1814 148.5 — — — — -225 +124 — 65.7% +0.94 8–7 (53%) 10–1 (91%) — +1.02 1985 1658 140.8 — — — — -107 +24 — 51.4% +0.27 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.06
21 1986 1829 149.1 — — — — — +104 — 62.5% +0.94 9–2 (82%) 5–3 (63%) — -1.18 1986 1673 146.8 — — — — -122 +62 — 48.5% +0.17 4–9 (31%) 3–6 (33%) — -1.67
22 1987 1891 153.1 — — — — -345 +124 — 66.7% +1.10 9–8 (53%) 12–8 (60%) — -0.79 1987 1737 146.2 — — — — -103 +50 — 52.5% +0.28 11–9 (55%) 6–12 (33%) — -0.17
23 1988 1741 143.8 — — — — -84 +115 — 56.7% +0.57 6–6 (50%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.19 1988 1758 147.5 — — — — -108 +114 — 54.5% +0.37 10–5 (67%) 3–6 (33%) — -2.17
24 1989 1948 147.5 — — — — -114 -9 — 69.3% +1.12 14–6 (70%) 11–7 (61%) — +0.50 1989 1767 140.6 — — — — -86 +69 — 56.6% +0.51 7–6 (54%) 5–12 (29%) — -0.70
25 1990 1768 136.5 — — — — -21 +142 — 58.3% +0.39 11–7 (61%) 11–6 (65%) — +1.68 1990 1817 146.9 — — — — -53 +22 — 52.4% +0.25 14–7 (67%) 11–11 (50%) — -2.13
26 1991 1707 146.0 +0.84 -0.20 0.987 49.8% -22 +147 — 47.7% 0.00 11–3 (79%) 6–11 (35%) — -3.34 1991 1644 129.0 -2.96 -1.86 0.840 46.7% +4 +89 — 41.5% -0.55 9–9 (50%) 6–10 (38%) — -0.22
27 1992 1682 122.5 -0.08 +0.48 1.004 50.2% -2 +24 — 46.1% -0.28 7–6 (54%) 7–5 (58%) — 0.00 1992 1538 118.8 -3.87 -0.90 0.853 46.8% +65 +61 — 35.2% -0.52 2–8 (20%) 0–8 (0%) — -0.10
28 1993 1604 96.1 -2.34 -3.48 0.784 45.7% — +20 — 18.2% -1.73 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.57 1993 1603 135.0 -0.84 +0.11 0.956 49.1% -46 +90 — 44.2% -0.28 6–10 (38%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.63
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1580 139.1 -0.81 -0.72 0.907 48.4% -20 +103 — 42.2% -0.44 8–9 (47%) 6–9 (40%) — -1.66
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1586 133.1 -0.47 -0.84 0.927 48.7% +44 +35 — 43.8% -0.29 2–4 (33%) 1–5 (17%) — +0.29
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1525 105.4 +0.11 -1.40 0.854 46.6% +53 — — 9.1% -1.91 0–1 0–6 (0%) — +0.16
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1531 103.2 -1.61 -0.77 0.999 49.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 0–1 — +0.12
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1521 118.4 -1.43 -2.23 0.813 46.6% +36 +84 — 31.8% -0.82 1–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.06
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1430 102.3 -2.84 -1.35 0.891 47.4% +45 +90 +95 33.9% -1.20 1–6 (14%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.60
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1467 112.1 -2.05 +0.32 0.908 48.9% +50 — — 40.0% -0.50 0–2 0–1 — +0.18
Career — 1966 149.4 +0.25 -0.12 0.979 49.7% -87 +92 — 59.5% +0.61 80–50 (62%) 69–51 (58%) 107.8 -0.09 — 1896 144.1 -1.82 -0.97 0.891 47.8% -37 +67 +95 47.0% -0.08 82–92 (47%) 65–114 (36%) 89.5 -1.50

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.