H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Martin Jaite vs Ronald Agenor H2H: 3-1
Martin Jaite holds a 3–1 lead over Ronald Agenor in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Martin Jaite leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Martin Jaite won the 1990 Gstaad semifinal 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 61
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
HAI
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 1990* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Martin Jaite | 7-5 6-1 | Ronald Agenor | Match data |
| May 28, 1986* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Martin Jaite | 6-1 3-6 0-6 6-2 6-4 | Ronald Agenor | Match data |
| May 14, 1986* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Ronald Agenor | 6-4 6-4 | Martin Jaite | Match data |
| Sep 27, 1985* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Martin Jaite | 6-2 6-4 | Ronald Agenor | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Jaite | #1,214 | #10 | 1,226 | 1,965 | 272 | 157 | 63.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Ronald Agenor | #1,507 | #22 | 984 | 1,895 | 215 | 251 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Jaite | Ronald Agenor | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #285 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #56 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #49 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #17 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #74 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #14 | 1,890 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #54 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #28 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 46–14 | 76.7% | #11 | 1,947 | 0 | 9 | 1989 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #37 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1990 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #36 | 1,767 | 0 | 11 | 1990 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #29 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1991 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #46 | 1,706 | 0 | 12 | 1991 | 16–27 | 37.2% | #74 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1992 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #120 | 1,678 | 0 | 12 | 1992 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #132 | 1,538 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #245 | 1,601 | 0 | 12 | 1993 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #58 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,528 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #96 | 1,522 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #137 | 1,430 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,466 | 0 | 3 |