H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Martin Klizan vs Aljaz Bedene H2H: 1-2

Aljaz Bedene holds a 2–1 lead over Martin Klizan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Aljaz Bedene leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Aljaz Bedene won the 2017 Chennai round of 16 7-6(3) 6-7(3) 7-6(2).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martin Klizan
Slovakia Age 37 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Aljaz Bedene
SLO Age 37 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Aljaz Bedene #101 7-6(3) 6-7(3) 7-6(2) Martin Klizan #35 Match data Jan 6, 2017* R16 Chennai ATP 250 Hard
Martin Klizan #60 6-2 6-2 Aljaz Bedene #111 Match data Jul 12, 2012* R32 Croatia Open Umag ATP 250 Clay
Aljaz Bedene #156 6-4 7-6(6) Martin Klizan #101 Match data May 3, 2012* R32 Belgrade ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martin Klizan #831 #24 1,445 1,979 128 147 46.5% 0 0 0 2 4 6
Aljaz Bedene #1,030 #43 1,169 1,893 131 160 45.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martin Klizan Aljaz Bedene
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2007 1–1 50.0% #395 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2009 0–1 0.0% #234 1,542 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2010 1–2 33.3% #155 1,607 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2011 0–2 0.0% #117 1,600 0 0 2011 1–1 50.0% #165 1,598 0 0
22 2012 16–14 53.3% #30 1,792 0 1 2012 3–4 42.9% #86 1,627 0 0
23 2013 12–24 33.3% #108 1,690 0 1 2013 11–18 37.9% #95 1,631 0 0
24 2014 23–16 59.0% #34 1,930 0 2 2014 5–9 35.7% #145 1,671 0 0
25 2015 24–27 47.1% #43 1,797 0 3 2015 17–17 50.0% #45 1,777 0 0
26 2016 14–15 48.3% #35 1,752 0 5 2016 12–19 38.7% #101 1,740 0 0
27 2017 10–15 40.0% #141 1,757 0 5 2017 19–18 51.4% #49 1,816 0 0
28 2018 18–9 66.7% #41 1,917 0 6 2018 17–19 47.2% #67 1,733 0 0
29 2019 9–18 33.3% #141 1,701 0 6 2019 18–18 50.0% #58 1,844 0 0
30 2020 0–2 0.0% #151 1,648 0 6 2020 10–12 45.5% #58 1,798 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2021 15–15 50.0% #109 1,773 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2022 3–10 23.1% #347 1,660 0 0
35 2025 0–1 0.0% #835 1,555 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martin Klizan Aljaz Bedene
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2007 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2012 10 6 16 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2012 2 1 3 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
23 2013 4 13 17 23.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2013 4 8 12 33.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2014 8 8 16 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 2014 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2015 12 14 26 46.2% 12 11 23 52.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2015 10 10 20 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2016 8 12 20 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 6 8 14 42.9% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2017 5 8 13 38.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2017 6 10 16 37.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
28 2018 6 5 11 54.5% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — 2018 2 7 9 22.2% 14 9 23 60.9% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 2019 4 9 13 30.8% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 8 7 15 53.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2020 8 11 19 42.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 6 5 11 54.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
35 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 58 79 137 42.3% 66 55 121 54.5% 4 13 17 23.5% — 57 74 131 43.5% 61 64 125 48.8% 13 22 35 37.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 271/275 of Martin Klizan's and 290/291 of Aljaz Bedene's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Martin Klizan Aljaz Bedene
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2007 2/2 4.5 5.0 50.7% 64.2% 50.8% 61.7% 45.0% 58.5% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1/1 2.0 3.0 44.4% 64.3% 37.1% 44.4% 30.0% 49.2% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 3/3 4.7 7.3 48.1% 67.9% 41.9% 64.6% 41.1% 54.6% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 2/2 1.5 5.5 60.6% 52.6% 35.0% 22.7% 29.2% 45.7% 35.2% 2011 2/2 9.0 2.5 60.2% 81.9% 49.2% 42.9% 33.3% 69.0% 28.3%
22 2012 29/30 3.9 3.5 56.1% 71.1% 50.5% 56.3% 48.2% 62.1% 41.4% 2012 7/7 5.6 3.6 56.4% 71.7% 41.5% 62.9% 49.7% 57.7% 34.3%
23 2013 36/36 6.0 3.9 54.7% 67.3% 48.8% 60.3% 40.6% 58.8% 36.4% 2013 29/29 7.9 3.7 57.4% 72.6% 50.5% 49.4% 43.5% 62.9% 36.7%
24 2014 36/39 5.7 3.2 56.9% 73.3% 52.4% 61.3% 44.3% 63.9% 37.9% 2014 14/14 8.8 3.1 53.1% 71.5% 45.5% 45.9% 48.1% 59.5% 33.9%
25 2015 51/51 4.8 3.6 57.5% 68.9% 48.4% 56.2% 42.0% 60.3% 34.4% 2015 34/34 8.1 2.9 54.0% 76.1% 48.8% 58.9% 43.1% 63.5% 35.6%
26 2016 29/29 4.6 4.4 58.0% 69.6% 49.4% 58.1% 49.6% 60.7% 38.5% 2016 31/31 9.1 2.9 57.4% 73.7% 49.6% 55.2% 42.1% 63.3% 35.5%
27 2017 25/25 3.3 3.3 64.7% 67.0% 50.6% 58.0% 40.2% 61.2% 36.6% 2017 37/37 7.9 2.0 59.3% 73.4% 52.1% 55.4% 40.6% 64.8% 36.3%
28 2018 27/27 4.5 2.4 62.1% 70.2% 55.5% 59.1% 54.5% 64.5% 37.8% 2018 36/36 8.1 2.2 57.6% 72.3% 49.3% 59.6% 32.0% 62.3% 37.5%
29 2019 27/27 4.3 4.5 58.1% 67.0% 47.9% 55.1% 48.2% 58.9% 35.1% 2019 35/36 9.4 3.2 57.1% 74.2% 49.1% 59.0% 45.0% 63.9% 35.1%
30 2020 2/2 5.0 1.5 55.6% 68.0% 47.9% 51.4% 32.5% 59.0% 34.8% 2020 22/22 9.4 3.7 56.7% 77.7% 45.9% 56.2% 31.1% 64.3% 30.5%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 30/30 8.2 3.6 54.2% 75.6% 50.8% 54.9% 41.8% 64.1% 36.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 13/13 8.7 4.8 54.8% 72.7% 45.1% 58.4% 39.4% 60.0% 32.5%
35 2025 1/1 0.0 4.0 64.0% 72.0% 42.0% 56.0% 60.0% 62.0% 29.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 271/275 4.7 3.7 58.0% 69.2% 50.0% 57.8% 45.2% 60.9% 37.0% — 290/291 8.4 3.0 56.5% 74.1% 49.1% 55.9% 40.7% 63.2% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martin Klizan Aljaz Bedene
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2007 1524 104.9 -2.40 -0.79 1.001 50.8% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 1506 98.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1543 104.5 -2.83 -2.96 0.851 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 1607 113.5 +0.26 +1.44 0.780 45.9% — — — 33.3% -0.78 1–1 — — -0.14 2010 1510 96.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 1601 108.6 -3.98 +3.39 0.648 40.3% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.28 2011 1598 111.4 -3.13 +1.53 0.912 49.2% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.14
22 2012 1793 136.2 -0.83 +2.99 1.092 51.5% -45 -158 -236 52.6% +0.10 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 97.2 +0.80 2012 1628 112.4 -0.63 -2.09 0.811 46.5% +15 -14 — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.05
23 2013 1690 141.7 -2.90 -0.83 0.884 48.1% -55 +13 -130 39.3% -0.74 4–11 (27%) 6–8 (43%) 93.2 +0.17 2013 1631 135.7 -0.57 -0.46 0.989 49.7% -24 +25 -80 43.4% -0.46 3–9 (25%) 5–4 (56%) 98.7 -0.37
24 2014 1930 145.3 +0.98 +1.95 1.050 51.1% -137 +27 -329 56.4% +0.30 10–4 (71%) 11–8 (58%) 108.8 -2.11 2014 1671 125.5 -2.62 -1.76 0.838 46.8% +7 +10 — 29.4% -1.21 4–2 (67%) 1–5 (17%) 99.9 -0.18
25 2015 1798 145.6 -2.85 -1.50 0.865 47.5% -11 +44 — 45.3% -0.62 11–6 (65%) 17–5 (77%) 110.6 -0.15 2015 1777 143.0 -0.50 -0.29 0.974 49.4% +5 -47 -158 45.2% -0.30 7–2 (78%) 9–5 (64%) 110.1 -0.03
26 2016 1753 151.0 -1.88 +1.38 0.979 50.0% +2 +114 — 52.2% +0.12 6–7 (46%) 4–6 (40%) 99.4 +1.22 2016 1740 139.8 -0.05 -0.03 0.968 49.2% +1 -8 -110 41.0% -0.41 6–8 (43%) 10–7 (59%) 99.1 +0.06
27 2017 1757 144.6 -1.26 +0.29 0.943 49.2% -12 +78 — 47.5% +0.03 4–5 (44%) 6–9 (40%) 97.8 -0.38 2017 1816 141.4 +0.23 +0.59 1.031 49.9% -96 -15 -84 50.6% +0.28 7–4 (64%) 6–9 (40%) 103.5 +0.31
28 2018 1918 149.4 +0.58 +1.54 1.064 51.4% -96 +77 — 58.2% +0.43 8–2 (80%) 5–3 (63%) 109.8 -2.08 2018 1733 146.7 -0.98 +1.27 0.996 49.7% -89 +112 -31 46.8% -0.17 9–9 (50%) 9–9 (50%) 98.2 -1.19
29 2019 1702 134.3 -4.15 -1.03 0.853 47.6% +16 +145 — 37.1% -0.73 4–5 (44%) 7–7 (50%) 96.8 -0.18 2019 1844 145.1 +0.02 -0.45 0.970 49.6% -71 -22 -134 51.6% -0.02 6–7 (46%) 11–10 (52%) 101.2 -0.41
30 2020 1649 111.4 -0.19 -1.33 0.847 45.8% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.18 2020 1799 141.8 +0.66 -2.51 0.855 47.5% -20 +2 — 46.3% -0.15 4–1 (80%) 2–7 (22%) 98.8 -0.46
31 2021 1541 88.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1774 129.1 +0.73 -0.73 1.019 50.0% -1 -14 -65 49.4% -0.03 5–4 (56%) 9–7 (56%) 100.8 -0.98
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1661 118.5 -2.51 -2.70 0.811 46.8% +31 +88 — 36.6% -0.76 1–5 (17%) 2–4 (33%) 93.6 +0.07
35 2025 1556 101.9 -0.23 -0.93 0.763 47.0% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1980 146.1 -1.61 +0.42 0.947 49.3% -39 +43 -241 47.5% -0.22 52–48 (52%) 59–55 (52%) 103.7 -1.16 — 1893 144.0 -0.36 -0.42 0.960 49.1% -29 +18 -94 45.4% -0.25 53–52 (50%) 66–68 (49%) 101.6 -1.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.