H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Martin Klizan vs Ernests Gulbis H2H: 2-1

Martin Klizan holds a 2–1 lead over Ernests Gulbis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Martin Klizan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martin Klizan won the 2019 Munich third round 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martin Klizan
Slovakia Age 37 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Ernests Gulbis
LAT Age 37 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 5, 2019* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 Q1 Q Clay Martin Klizan #60 6-4 7-6(7) Ernests Gulbis #78 Match data
May 2, 2019* Munich ATP 250 R32 Clay Martin Klizan #60 6-3 7-5 Ernests Gulbis #78 Match data
Apr 30, 2018 Munich ATP 250 Q1 Q Clay Martin Klizan #122 4-6 6-3 6-4 Ernests Gulbis #190 Match data
Oct 3, 2014* Beijing ATP 500 R16 Hard Martin Klizan #56 6-2 3-0 (ret.) Ernests Gulbis #13 Match data
May 22, 2014* Nice ATP 250 R16 Clay Ernests Gulbis #19 6-7(4) 6-4 6-1 Martin Klizan #62 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Martin Klizan #831 #24 1,445 1,979 128 146 46.7% 0 0 0 2 4 6
Ernests Gulbis #893 #10 2,725 2,139 221 232 48.8% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martin Klizan Ernests Gulbis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2007 1–1 50.0% #395 1,524 0 0 2006 3–1 75.0% #141 1,556 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2007 6–14 30.0% #61 1,638 0 0
19 2009 0–1 0.0% #234 1,542 0 0 2008 22–20 52.4% #53 1,815 0 0
20 2010 1–2 33.3% #155 1,607 0 0 2009 17–26 39.5% #90 1,696 0 0
21 2011 0–2 0.0% #117 1,600 0 0 2010 29–20 59.2% #24 1,845 0 1
22 2012 16–13 55.2% #30 1,795 0 1 2011 18–22 45.0% #61 1,774 0 2
23 2013 12–24 33.3% #108 1,690 0 1 2012 12–17 41.4% #136 1,727 0 2
24 2014 23–16 59.0% #34 1,899 0 2 2013 32–18 64.0% #24 1,939 0 4
25 2015 24–27 47.1% #43 1,794 0 3 2014 41–21 66.1% #13 1,917 0 6
26 2016 14–15 48.3% #35 1,750 0 5 2015 11–24 31.4% #81 1,765 0 6
27 2017 10–15 40.0% #141 1,755 0 5 2016 7–14 33.3% #151 1,785 0 6
28 2018 18–9 66.7% #41 1,917 0 6 2017 6–8 42.9% #199 1,716 0 6
29 2019 9–18 33.3% #141 1,703 0 6 2018 9–6 60.0% #95 1,813 0 6
30 2020 0–2 0.0% #151 1,649 0 6 2019 6–17 26.1% #226 1,533 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2020 2–2 50.0% #181 1,562 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2021 0–2 0.0% #191 1,509 0 6
35 2025 0–1 0.0% #835 1,556 0 6 — — — — — — —