H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Martin Klizan vs Federico Delbonis H2H: 3-3

Martin Klizan and Federico Delbonis are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay, while Martin Klizan leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Federico Delbonis won the 2020 Santiago third round 6-1 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martin Klizan
Slovakia Age 37 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Federico Delbonis
ARG Age 35 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 27, 2020* Santiago ATP 250 R32 Clay Federico Delbonis #85 6-1 7-6(5) Martin Klizan #158 Match data
Apr 16, 2019* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Martin Klizan #50 7-6(3) 7-5 Federico Delbonis #74 Match data
Apr 25, 2018* Barcelona ATP 500 R64 Clay Martin Klizan #140 6-3 6-7(5) 6-4 Federico Delbonis #76 Match data
Feb 20, 2015* Rio de Janeiro ATP 500 R16 Clay Federico Delbonis #63 6-2 6-1 Martin Klizan #38 Match data
Aug 19, 2014* Winston-Salem ATP 250 R64 Hard Federico Delbonis #66 7-6(5) 6-4 Martin Klizan #65 Match data
Jun 18, 2014* Eastbourne ATP 250 R32 Grass Martin Klizan #57 6-4 6-4 Federico Delbonis #39 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Martin Klizan #831 #24 1,445 1,979 128 146 46.7% 0 0 0 2 4 6
Federico Delbonis #939 #33 1,435 1,905 158 195 44.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martin Klizan Federico Delbonis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2007 1–1 50.0% #395 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — 2009 0–1 0.0% #195 1,530 0 0
19 2009 0–1 0.0% #234 1,542 0 0 2010 0–2 0.0% #160 1,469 0 0
20 2010 1–2 33.3% #155 1,607 0 0 2011 3–2 60.0% #166 1,558 0 0
21 2011 0–2 0.0% #117 1,600 0 0 2012 6–9 40.0% #133 1,716 0 0
22 2012 16–13 55.2% #30 1,795 0 1 2013 12–8 60.0% #55 1,757 0 0
23 2013 12–24 33.3% #108 1,690 0 1 2014 20–27 42.6% #60 1,660 0 1
24 2014 23–16 59.0% #34 1,899 0 2 2015 15–18 45.5% #52 1,692 0 1
25 2015 24–27 47.1% #43 1,794 0 3 2016 24–22 52.2% #41 1,754 0 2
26 2016 14–15 48.3% #35 1,750 0 5 2017 11–10 52.4% #68 1,811 0 2
27 2017 10–15 40.0% #141 1,755 0 5 2018 11–18 37.9% #80 1,723 0 2
28 2018 18–9 66.7% #41 1,917 0 6 2019 14–20 41.2% #76 1,686 0 2
29 2019 9–18 33.3% #141 1,703 0 6 2020 9–12 42.9% #82 1,705 0 2
30 2020 0–2 0.0% #151 1,649 0 6 2021 24–24 50.0% #44 1,719 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2022 8–21 27.6% #125 1,672 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2023 1–1 50.0% #279 1,599 0 2
35 2025 0–1 0.0% #835 1,556 0 6 — — — — — — —