Martin Klizan
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabio Fognini | 3 | 4 | 7 | Sep 21, 2018 | H2H |
| Federico Delbonis | 3 | 3 | 6 | Feb 27, 2020 | H2H |
| Viktor Troicki | 1 | 5 | 6 | Feb 6, 2016 | H2H |
| Marin Cilic | 0 | 5 | 5 | Aug 28, 2019 | H2H |
| Dominic Thiem | 3 | 2 | 5 | Apr 17, 2019 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC
Fernando Gonzalez holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Klizan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fernando Gonzalez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Gonzalez won the 2011 Belgrade round of 32 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Gonzalez | 6-2 6-4 | Martin Klizan | Match data | Apr 28, 2011* | R32 | Belgrade | ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Klizan | #831 | #24 | 1,445 | 1,979 | 128 | 147 | 46.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Fernando Gonzalez | #569 | #5 | 3,285 | 2,084 | 340 | 194 | 63.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Klizan | Fernando Gonzalez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #395 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #412 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #115 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #155 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #18 | 1,861 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2012 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #30 | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2013 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #23 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2014 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,930 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #11 | 1,893 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2015 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #43 | 1,797 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #10 | 1,977 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2016 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #35 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #7 | 1,868 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2017 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #141 | 1,757 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 37–16 | 69.8% | #15 | 1,895 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2018 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #41 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #11 | 1,994 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2019 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,701 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #68 | 1,851 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,648 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #298 | 1,810 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #509 | 1,781 | 0 | 11 |
| 35 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #835 | 1,555 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Martin Klizan | Fernando Gonzalez | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 2007 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2011 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 17 | 8 | 25 | 68.0% | 17 | 9 | 26 | 65.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% |
| 22 | 2012 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 14 | 14 | 28 | 50.0% | 17 | 9 | 26 | 65.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 2013 | 4 | 13 | 17 | 23.5% | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 17 | 7 | 24 | 70.8% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2014 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 19 | 9 | 28 | 67.9% | 17 | 8 | 25 | 68.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% |
| 25 | 2015 | 12 | 14 | 26 | 46.2% | 12 | 11 | 23 | 52.2% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 26 | 11 | 37 | 70.3% | 13 | 5 | 18 | 72.2% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| 26 | 2016 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 21 | 13 | 34 | 61.8% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2017 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 18 | 12 | 30 | 60.0% | 16 | 2 | 18 | 88.9% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2018 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 21 | 12 | 33 | 63.6% | 16 | 3 | 19 | 84.2% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2019 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2020 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 58 | 79 | 137 | 42.3% | 66 | 55 | 121 | 54.5% | 4 | 13 | 17 | 23.5% | — | — | — | — | — | 161 | 104 | 265 | 60.8% | 142 | 67 | 209 | 67.9% | 22 | 13 | 35 | 62.9% | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 271/275 of Martin Klizan's and 501/534 of Fernando Gonzalez's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Martin Klizan | Fernando Gonzalez | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | 2007 | 2/2 | 4.5 | 5.0 | 50.7% | 64.2% | 50.8% | 61.7% | 45.0% | 58.5% | 41.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 2/2 | 5.5 | 11.0 | 59.2% | 70.6% | 52.1% | 71.8% | 50.0% | 59.8% | 31.4% |
| 19 | 2009 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 44.4% | 64.3% | 37.1% | 44.4% | 30.0% | 49.2% | 43.2% | 2000 | 12/13 | 6.3 | 8.3 | 56.5% | 73.6% | 44.7% | 50.2% | 40.3% | 60.9% | 40.5% |
| 20 | 2010 | 3/3 | 4.7 | 7.3 | 48.1% | 67.9% | 41.9% | 64.6% | 41.1% | 54.6% | 35.4% | 2001 | 14/15 | 4.9 | 7.2 | 59.0% | 64.0% | 44.3% | 53.8% | 34.5% | 55.8% | 33.8% |
| 21 | 2011 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 5.5 | 60.6% | 52.6% | 35.0% | 22.7% | 29.2% | 45.7% | 35.2% | 2002 | 51/61 | 7.5 | 5.5 | 59.6% | 75.9% | 51.2% | 66.3% | 45.8% | 66.0% | 38.4% |
| 22 | 2012 | 29/30 | 3.9 | 3.5 | 56.1% | 71.1% | 50.5% | 56.3% | 48.2% | 62.1% | 41.4% | 2003 | 54/56 | 7.3 | 5.1 | 59.8% | 73.9% | 51.4% | 59.8% | 50.9% | 64.5% | 37.3% |
| 23 | 2013 | 36/36 | 6.0 | 3.9 | 54.7% | 67.3% | 48.8% | 60.3% | 40.6% | 58.8% | 36.4% | 2004 | 49/55 | 6.3 | 3.8 | 59.7% | 74.4% | 51.0% | 56.4% | 37.5% | 64.8% | 37.0% |
| 24 | 2014 | 36/39 | 5.7 | 3.2 | 56.9% | 73.3% | 52.4% | 61.3% | 44.3% | 63.9% | 37.9% | 2005 | 66/67 | 7.4 | 4.3 | 58.7% | 77.8% | 54.4% | 60.6% | 40.8% | 68.1% | 37.4% |
| 25 | 2015 | 51/51 | 4.8 | 3.6 | 57.5% | 68.9% | 48.4% | 56.2% | 42.0% | 60.3% | 34.4% | 2006 | 66/67 | 6.3 | 3.4 | 63.3% | 73.3% | 52.5% | 65.1% | 40.2% | 65.5% | 37.6% |
| 26 | 2016 | 29/29 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 58.0% | 69.6% | 49.4% | 58.1% | 49.6% | 60.7% | 38.5% | 2007 | 51/54 | 6.6 | 2.5 | 63.6% | 72.6% | 52.5% | 57.9% | 43.9% | 65.3% | 37.0% |
| 27 | 2017 | 25/25 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 64.7% | 67.0% | 50.6% | 58.0% | 40.2% | 61.2% | 36.6% | 2008 | 45/53 | 6.2 | 3.1 | 62.4% | 73.2% | 54.3% | 64.0% | 43.8% | 66.1% | 36.9% |
| 28 | 2018 | 27/27 | 4.5 | 2.4 | 62.1% | 70.2% | 55.5% | 59.1% | 54.5% | 64.5% | 37.8% | 2009 | 55/55 | 8.3 | 2.9 | 63.6% | 77.2% | 53.8% | 67.4% | 42.5% | 68.6% | 36.6% |
| 29 | 2019 | 27/27 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 58.1% | 67.0% | 47.9% | 55.1% | 48.2% | 58.9% | 35.1% | 2010 | 22/22 | 8.2 | 4.2 | 59.2% | 77.2% | 49.4% | 66.2% | 44.8% | 65.8% | 35.0% |
| 30 | 2020 | 2/2 | 5.0 | 1.5 | 55.6% | 68.0% | 47.9% | 51.4% | 32.5% | 59.0% | 34.8% | 2011 | 7/7 | 7.4 | 2.1 | 55.4% | 76.5% | 56.2% | 66.0% | 22.7% | 67.5% | 33.1% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 7/7 | 4.9 | 2.0 | 61.2% | 67.8% | 48.5% | 53.1% | 32.0% | 60.0% | 33.1% |
| 35 | 2025 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 64.0% | 72.0% | 42.0% | 56.0% | 60.0% | 62.0% | 29.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 271/275 | 4.7 | 3.7 | 58.0% | 69.2% | 50.0% | 57.8% | 45.2% | 60.9% | 37.0% | — | 501/534 | 7.0 | 4.0 | 60.9% | 74.6% | 52.1% | 61.9% | 42.4% | 65.7% | 37.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Martin Klizan | Fernando Gonzalez | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2007 | 1524 | 104.9 | -2.40 | -0.79 | 1.001 | 50.8% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2008 | 1506 | 98.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1511 | 105.6 | -1.67 | -0.17 | 0.781 | 47.2% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.60 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.05 |
| 19 | 2009 | 1543 | 104.5 | -2.83 | -2.96 | 0.851 | 46.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | +0.11 | 2000 | 1622 | 121.4 | -1.12 | +1.03 | 1.035 | 50.5% | -12 | -28 | — | 57.6% | +0.52 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–1 | — | +0.85 |
| 20 | 2010 | 1607 | 113.5 | +0.26 | +1.44 | 0.780 | 45.9% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.78 | 1–1 | — | — | -0.14 | 2001 | 1524 | 97.3 | -3.20 | -2.78 | 0.764 | 45.2% | +15 | +53 | — | 39.0% | -1.07 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +1.83 |
| 21 | 2011 | 1601 | 108.6 | -3.98 | +3.39 | 0.648 | 40.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.25 | — | — | — | -0.28 | 2002 | 1862 | 149.3 | +3.57 | +0.68 | 1.131 | 52.3% | -55 | -70 | — | 62.5% | +0.77 | 10–9 (53%) | 20–12 (63%) | 109.2 | +0.58 |
| 22 | 2012 | 1793 | 136.2 | -0.83 | +2.99 | 1.092 | 51.5% | -45 | -158 | -236 | 52.6% | +0.10 | 4–5 (44%) | 3–7 (30%) | 97.2 | +0.80 | 2003 | 1736 | 139.9 | +2.24 | -0.64 | 1.051 | 51.0% | -33 | +148 | — | 55.8% | +0.46 | 12–10 (55%) | 13–11 (54%) | 98.8 | +1.01 |
| 23 | 2013 | 1690 | 141.7 | -2.90 | -0.83 | 0.884 | 48.1% | -55 | +13 | -130 | 39.3% | -0.74 | 4–11 (27%) | 6–8 (43%) | 93.2 | +0.17 | 2004 | 1772 | 149.3 | +2.09 | +0.53 | 1.050 | 50.5% | -18 | +128 | -182 | 57.8% | +0.27 | 10–7 (59%) | 12–11 (52%) | 104.0 | -0.95 |
| 24 | 2014 | 1930 | 145.3 | +0.98 | +1.95 | 1.050 | 51.1% | -137 | +27 | -329 | 56.4% | +0.30 | 10–4 (71%) | 11–8 (58%) | 108.8 | -2.11 | 2005 | 1893 | 150.4 | +5.23 | +1.17 | 1.172 | 52.6% | -23 | +18 | -165 | 64.7% | +0.84 | 11–10 (52%) | 18–11 (62%) | 101.9 | +1.02 |
| 25 | 2015 | 1798 | 145.6 | -2.85 | -1.50 | 0.865 | 47.5% | -11 | +44 | — | 45.3% | -0.62 | 11–6 (65%) | 17–5 (77%) | 110.6 | -0.15 | 2006 | 1977 | 157.7 | +3.14 | +1.75 | 1.089 | 51.5% | -6 | -25 | -185 | 62.1% | +0.57 | 17–9 (65%) | 16–11 (59%) | 103.3 | +0.01 |
| 26 | 2016 | 1753 | 151.0 | -1.88 | +1.38 | 0.979 | 50.0% | +2 | +114 | — | 52.2% | +0.12 | 6–7 (46%) | 4–6 (40%) | 99.4 | +1.22 | 2007 | 1869 | 157.8 | +2.59 | +1.12 | 1.065 | 51.0% | +61 | +45 | -58 | 57.0% | +0.42 | 11–8 (58%) | 15–9 (63%) | 101.1 | +0.42 |
| 27 | 2017 | 1757 | 144.6 | -1.26 | +0.29 | 0.943 | 49.2% | -12 | +78 | — | 47.5% | +0.03 | 4–5 (44%) | 6–9 (40%) | 97.8 | -0.38 | 2008 | 1895 | 145.8 | +2.46 | +0.17 | 1.089 | 51.3% | -20 | +167 | -83 | 63.6% | +0.70 | 11–5 (69%) | 19–11 (63%) | 104.4 | +1.26 |
| 28 | 2018 | 1918 | 149.4 | +0.58 | +1.54 | 1.064 | 51.4% | -96 | +77 | — | 58.2% | +0.43 | 8–2 (80%) | 5–3 (63%) | 109.8 | -2.08 | 2009 | 1994 | 164.5 | +5.52 | +1.03 | 1.165 | 52.4% | -28 | +162 | -147 | 67.4% | +0.98 | 8–5 (62%) | 6–9 (40%) | 99.4 | -0.25 |
| 29 | 2019 | 1702 | 134.3 | -4.15 | -1.03 | 0.853 | 47.6% | +16 | +145 | — | 37.1% | -0.73 | 4–5 (44%) | 7–7 (50%) | 96.8 | -0.18 | 2010 | 1852 | 136.5 | +1.61 | -1.28 | 1.024 | 50.6% | +68 | +161 | — | 57.1% | +0.16 | 6–5 (55%) | 7–2 (78%) | 99.6 | +0.97 |
| 30 | 2020 | 1649 | 111.4 | -0.19 | -1.33 | 0.847 | 45.8% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.00 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.18 | 2011 | 1811 | 116.1 | +0.06 | -0.31 | 1.016 | 50.2% | — | — | +69 | 42.1% | -0.21 | — | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.01 |
| 31 | 2021 | 1541 | 88.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1782 | 121.2 | -1.27 | -2.78 | 0.828 | 47.7% | — | +179 | — | 38.5% | -0.92 | 0–1 | 2–2 (50%) | — | -0.35 |
| 35 | 2025 | 1556 | 101.9 | -0.23 | -0.93 | 0.763 | 47.0% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1980 | 146.1 | -1.61 | +0.42 | 0.947 | 49.3% | -39 | +43 | -241 | 47.5% | -0.22 | 52–48 (52%) | 59–55 (52%) | 103.7 | -1.16 | — | 2085 | 154.5 | +2.93 | +0.53 | 1.078 | 51.3% | -11 | +73 | -114 | 60.0% | +0.53 | 102–74 (58%) | 132–95 (58%) | 106.0 | +1.22 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabio Fognini | 3 | 4 | 7 | Sep 21, 2018 | H2H |
| Federico Delbonis | 3 | 3 | 6 | Feb 27, 2020 | H2H |
| Viktor Troicki | 1 | 5 | 6 | Feb 6, 2016 | H2H |
| Marin Cilic | 0 | 5 | 5 | Aug 28, 2019 | H2H |
| Dominic Thiem | 3 | 2 | 5 | Apr 17, 2019 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Federer | 1 | 12 | 13 | Mar 19, 2009 | H2H |
| Andy Roddick | 3 | 8 | 11 | Jan 26, 2010 | H2H |
| Jose Acasuso | 9 | 2 | 11 | Apr 23, 2009 | H2H |
| Rafael Nadal | 3 | 7 | 10 | Sep 10, 2009 | H2H |
| David Ferrer | 4 | 5 | 9 | Feb 25, 2012 | H2H |