H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Martin Klizan vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 1-2

Fernando Verdasco holds a 2–1 lead over Martin Klizan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Fernando Verdasco leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Martin Klizan won the 2017 Rotterdam third round 6-4 0-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martin Klizan
Slovakia Age 37 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 16, 2017* Rotterdam ATP 500 R32 Hard Martin Klizan #73 6-4 0-6 6-1 Fernando Verdasco #39 Match data
Mar 13, 2016* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Fernando Verdasco #65 5-3 (ret.) Martin Klizan #28 Match data
Jul 1, 2015* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Fernando Verdasco #43 4-6 6-2 6-3 6-7(5) 13-11 Martin Klizan #39 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Martin Klizan #831 #24 1,445 1,979 128 146 46.7% 0 0 0 2 4 6
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martin Klizan Fernando Verdasco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2007 1–1 50.0% #395 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 2009 0–1 0.0% #234 1,542 0 0 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0
20 2010 1–2 33.3% #155 1,607 0 0 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1
21 2011 0–2 0.0% #117 1,600 0 0 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1
22 2012 16–13 55.2% #30 1,795 0 1 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 2013 12–24 33.3% #108 1,690 0 1 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 2014 23–16 59.0% #34 1,899 0 2 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2
25 2015 24–27 47.1% #43 1,794 0 3 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3
26 2016 14–15 48.3% #35 1,750 0 5 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5
27 2017 10–15 40.0% #141 1,755 0 5 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5
28 2018 18–9 66.7% #41 1,917 0 6 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5
29 2019 9–18 33.3% #141 1,703 0 6 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5
30 2020 0–2 0.0% #151 1,649 0 6 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7
33 — — — — — — — 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 — — — — — — — 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7
35 2025 0–1 0.0% #835 1,556 0 6 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7