H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Martin Klizan vs Igor Sijsling H2H: 3-0
Martin Klizan holds a 3–0 lead over Igor Sijsling in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Martin Klizan leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martin Klizan won the 2016 Hamburg third round 6-4 1-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Slovakia
Age 37
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 38
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2016* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Martin Klizan | 6-4 1-6 6-3 | Igor Sijsling | Match data |
| Jul 16, 2014* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Martin Klizan | 6-4 3-6 6-0 | Igor Sijsling | Match data |
| Feb 15, 2013* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Martin Klizan | 6-2 6-4 | Igor Sijsling | Match data |
| Jun 20, 2011 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Q1 | Grass | Igor Sijsling | 6-1 2-0 (ret.) | Martin Klizan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Klizan | #831 | #24 | 1,445 | 1,979 | 128 | 146 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Igor Sijsling | #854 | #52 | 910 | 1,794 | 44 | 84 | 34.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Klizan | Igor Sijsling | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #395 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #155 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #525 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #126 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #200 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #68 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #43 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #35 | 1,750 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 9–25 | 26.5% | #84 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #141 | 1,755 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #145 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #41 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #177 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,703 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,649 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #835 | 1,556 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |