H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Martin Klizan vs Julien Benneteau H2H: 0-1

Julien Benneteau holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Klizan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julien Benneteau leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julien Benneteau won the 2016 Metz round of 32 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martin Klizan
Slovakia Age 37 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Julien Benneteau
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Julien Benneteau #238 6-2 6-1 Martin Klizan #31 Match data Sep 22, 2016* R32 Metz ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martin Klizan #831 #24 1,445 1,979 128 147 46.5% 0 0 0 2 4 6
Julien Benneteau #140 #25 1,608 1,959 270 293 48.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martin Klizan Julien Benneteau
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2007 1–1 50.0% #395 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2009 0–1 0.0% #234 1,542 0 0 2001 1–1 50.0% #271 1,495 0 0
20 2010 1–2 33.3% #155 1,607 0 0 2002 0–2 0.0% #253 1,452 0 0
21 2011 0–2 0.0% #117 1,600 0 0 2003 3–7 30.0% #138 1,548 0 0
22 2012 16–14 53.3% #30 1,792 0 1 2004 14–15 48.3% #65 1,637 0 0
23 2013 12–24 33.3% #108 1,690 0 1 2005 5–18 21.7% #165 1,535 0 0
24 2014 23–16 59.0% #34 1,930 0 2 2006 24–22 52.2% #40 1,707 0 0
25 2015 24–27 47.1% #43 1,797 0 3 2007 22–28 44.0% #68 1,672 0 0
26 2016 14–15 48.3% #35 1,752 0 5 2008 22–20 52.4% #43 1,786 0 0
27 2017 10–15 40.0% #141 1,757 0 5 2009 26–28 48.1% #46 1,794 0 0
28 2018 18–9 66.7% #41 1,917 0 6 2010 24–19 55.8% #44 1,854 0 0
29 2019 9–18 33.3% #141 1,701 0 6 2011 21–21 50.0% #52 1,872 0 0
30 2020 0–2 0.0% #151 1,648 0 6 2012 27–22 55.1% #35 1,883 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2013 27–25 51.9% #35 1,863 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2014 25–22 53.2% #25 1,895 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2015 1–5 16.7% #527 1,800 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2016 7–14 33.3% #130 1,806 0 0
35 2025 0–1 0.0% #835 1,555 0 6 2017 13–13 50.0% #56 1,863 0 0
36 — — — — — — — 2018 8–11 42.1% #140 1,806 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martin Klizan Julien Benneteau
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2007 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
22 2012 10 6 16 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2004 5 8 13 38.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
23 2013 4 13 17 23.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2005 3 7 10 30.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2014 8 8 16 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2006 14 12 26 53.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 2015 12 14 26 46.2% 12 11 23 52.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2007 13 18 31 41.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2016 8 12 20 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 10 13 23 43.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
27 2017 5 8 13 38.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2009 16 16 32 50.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
28 2018 6 5 11 54.5% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 14 11 25 56.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
29 2019 4 9 13 30.8% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 13 10 23 56.5% 4 8 12 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
30 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 19 15 34 55.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 21 17 38 55.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 22 16 38 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 6 10 16 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
35 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
Career — 58 79 137 42.3% 66 55 121 54.5% 4 13 17 23.5% — — — — — 174 178 352 49.4% 46 63 109 42.2% 36 40 76 47.4% 14 12 26 53.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 271/275 of Martin Klizan's and 556/561 of Julien Benneteau's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Martin Klizan Julien Benneteau
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2007 2/2 4.5 5.0 50.7% 64.2% 50.8% 61.7% 45.0% 58.5% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1/1 2.0 3.0 44.4% 64.3% 37.1% 44.4% 30.0% 49.2% 43.2% 2001 1/2 5.0 1.0 52.4% 60.5% 41.0% 53.8% 50.0% 51.2% 39.4%
20 2010 3/3 4.7 7.3 48.1% 67.9% 41.9% 64.6% 41.1% 54.6% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 2/2 1.5 5.5 60.6% 52.6% 35.0% 22.7% 29.2% 45.7% 35.2% 2003 10/10 2.7 2.8 63.9% 60.1% 47.6% 47.1% 29.1% 55.7% 35.4%
22 2012 29/30 3.9 3.5 56.1% 71.1% 50.5% 56.3% 48.2% 62.1% 41.4% 2004 29/29 3.9 3.3 62.3% 68.8% 48.6% 55.1% 39.6% 61.2% 36.9%
23 2013 36/36 6.0 3.9 54.7% 67.3% 48.8% 60.3% 40.6% 58.8% 36.4% 2005 23/23 3.7 2.8 64.2% 64.0% 42.8% 58.6% 39.5% 56.5% 36.3%
24 2014 36/39 5.7 3.2 56.9% 73.3% 52.4% 61.3% 44.3% 63.9% 37.9% 2006 46/46 5.4 3.1 67.2% 66.8% 48.4% 59.4% 38.9% 60.6% 37.6%
25 2015 51/51 4.8 3.6 57.5% 68.9% 48.4% 56.2% 42.0% 60.3% 34.4% 2007 50/50 4.3 3.1 64.6% 66.5% 52.5% 54.8% 38.9% 61.5% 37.2%
26 2016 29/29 4.6 4.4 58.0% 69.6% 49.4% 58.1% 49.6% 60.7% 38.5% 2008 41/42 4.3 3.3 64.1% 70.0% 50.6% 57.6% 37.4% 63.1% 37.9%
27 2017 25/25 3.3 3.3 64.7% 67.0% 50.6% 58.0% 40.2% 61.2% 36.6% 2009 54/54 5.6 3.2 66.0% 69.9% 48.7% 56.9% 39.1% 62.7% 36.7%
28 2018 27/27 4.5 2.4 62.1% 70.2% 55.5% 59.1% 54.5% 64.5% 37.8% 2010 43/43 7.0 3.7 65.7% 69.6% 47.9% 56.5% 40.0% 62.0% 36.4%
29 2019 27/27 4.3 4.5 58.1% 67.0% 47.9% 55.1% 48.2% 58.9% 35.1% 2011 42/42 5.8 3.3 64.0% 71.8% 50.8% 58.7% 39.8% 64.2% 36.3%
30 2020 2/2 5.0 1.5 55.6% 68.0% 47.9% 51.4% 32.5% 59.0% 34.8% 2012 47/49 6.9 4.0 65.7% 71.0% 50.4% 55.1% 46.8% 63.8% 38.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 51/52 6.2 2.9 63.4% 70.0% 50.3% 50.8% 38.5% 62.8% 38.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 47/47 7.6 2.9 64.6% 73.1% 50.9% 62.1% 40.7% 65.0% 35.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 6/6 6.0 1.7 66.0% 71.8% 53.6% 22.8% 34.0% 65.3% 27.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 21/21 7.9 3.0 62.1% 69.6% 53.4% 59.6% 33.2% 63.2% 34.9%
35 2025 1/1 0.0 4.0 64.0% 72.0% 42.0% 56.0% 60.0% 62.0% 29.0% 2017 26/26 7.4 4.2 60.4% 75.3% 49.6% 57.6% 38.0% 65.3% 36.3%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 19/19 10.1 6.0 58.3% 70.2% 45.7% 58.1% 37.7% 59.9% 34.8%
Career — 271/275 4.7 3.7 58.0% 69.2% 50.0% 57.8% 45.2% 60.9% 37.0% — 556/563 5.9 3.4 64.3% 69.6% 49.6% 56.4% 39.3% 62.4% 36.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martin Klizan Julien Benneteau
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2007 1524 104.9 -2.40 -0.79 1.001 50.8% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 1506 98.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1498 100.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1543 104.5 -2.83 -2.96 0.851 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.11 2001 1495 107.8 -2.66 +3.68 0.808 45.8% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — +0.23
20 2010 1607 113.5 +0.26 +1.44 0.780 45.9% — — — 33.3% -0.78 1–1 — — -0.14 2002 1452 94.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.80 — — — -0.09
21 2011 1601 108.6 -3.98 +3.39 0.648 40.3% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.28 2003 1548 113.3 -3.92 -1.10 0.798 45.3% +23 -61 — 26.9% -1.73 2–0 2–0 — -0.28
22 2012 1793 136.2 -0.83 +2.99 1.092 51.5% -45 -158 -236 52.6% +0.10 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 97.2 +0.80 2004 1638 129.1 -1.57 +1.46 0.952 48.9% +6 -44 -85 48.6% -0.22 3–4 (43%) 1–7 (13%) 95.9 -0.41
23 2013 1690 141.7 -2.90 -0.83 0.884 48.1% -55 +13 -130 39.3% -0.74 4–11 (27%) 6–8 (43%) 93.2 +0.17 2005 1536 119.2 -3.91 -0.41 0.835 46.9% +40 +10 -13 27.8% -1.39 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 92.2 -0.33
24 2014 1930 145.3 +0.98 +1.95 1.050 51.1% -137 +27 -329 56.4% +0.30 10–4 (71%) 11–8 (58%) 108.8 -2.11 2006 1707 133.9 -1.05 +0.70 0.955 49.2% +20 -94 -191 47.5% -0.30 10–5 (67%) 13–11 (54%) 108.1 +0.54
25 2015 1798 145.6 -2.85 -1.50 0.865 47.5% -11 +44 — 45.3% -0.62 11–6 (65%) 17–5 (77%) 110.6 -0.15 2007 1673 130.1 -1.22 +0.55 0.965 49.2% -11 -88 -162 46.0% -0.36 7–10 (41%) 11–8 (58%) 99.7 +1.04
26 2016 1753 151.0 -1.88 +1.38 0.979 50.0% +2 +114 — 52.2% +0.12 6–7 (46%) 4–6 (40%) 99.4 +1.22 2008 1787 143.1 +0.15 +2.10 1.026 50.2% -39 -21 -283 48.6% -0.27 7–7 (50%) 8–3 (73%) 105.9 -3.04
27 2017 1757 144.6 -1.26 +0.29 0.943 49.2% -12 +78 — 47.5% +0.03 4–5 (44%) 6–9 (40%) 97.8 -0.38 2009 1794 145.6 -0.39 +0.68 0.985 49.7% +29 -82 -256 46.5% -0.08 15–11 (58%) 8–13 (38%) 101.6 -0.56
28 2018 1918 149.4 +0.58 +1.54 1.064 51.4% -96 +77 — 58.2% +0.43 8–2 (80%) 5–3 (63%) 109.8 -2.08 2010 1854 142.2 -1.47 +0.40 0.958 49.2% -5 -172 -138 53.2% -0.07 8–5 (62%) 14–6 (70%) 107.8 -0.34
29 2019 1702 134.3 -4.15 -1.03 0.853 47.6% +16 +145 — 37.1% -0.73 4–5 (44%) 7–7 (50%) 96.8 -0.18 2011 1872 143.5 +0.78 -0.62 1.014 50.1% +21 -182 -112 48.6% +0.05 8–8 (50%) 9–8 (53%) 99.4 -0.79
30 2020 1649 111.4 -0.19 -1.33 0.847 45.8% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.18 2012 1884 153.7 +0.89 +1.57 1.053 51.0% -17 -159 -45 58.5% +0.32 6–12 (33%) 13–11 (54%) 95.5 -0.52
31 2021 1541 88.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1863 155.8 -0.38 +1.63 1.020 50.1% +13 -119 -42 52.3% +0.05 3–10 (23%) 14–10 (58%) 95.0 -0.69
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1895 157.3 +1.28 +0.40 1.026 50.6% +48 -215 -117 52.1% +0.21 9–9 (50%) 6–14 (30%) 93.2 +1.35
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1800 109.3 -0.93 -2.34 0.783 45.6% +20 — — 25.0% -1.50 — 1–1 — +0.34
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1806 142.3 -0.03 -1.08 0.950 48.8% -5 — -45 39.7% -0.60 3–4 (43%) 3–6 (33%) 97.5 -0.94
35 2025 1556 101.9 -0.23 -0.93 0.763 47.0% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.01 2017 1863 143.0 +1.12 +0.87 1.046 50.7% +23 — -101 50.8% +0.16 4–5 (44%) 4–6 (40%) 99.1 -0.93
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1807 131.6 -2.07 -0.63 0.869 47.5% -15 -176 +4 45.6% -0.58 1–2 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 101.1 -0.81
Career — 1980 146.1 -1.61 +0.42 0.947 49.3% -39 +43 -241 47.5% -0.22 52–48 (52%) 59–55 (52%) 103.7 -1.16 — 1960 148.1 -0.48 +0.63 0.977 49.5% +9 -103 -115 48.0% -0.19 86–96 (47%) 114–111 (51%) 99.8 -1.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.