H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Martin Klizan vs Somdev Devvarman H2H: 1-0
Martin Klizan holds a 1–0 lead over Somdev Devvarman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Martin Klizan leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Martin Klizan won the 2014 Barcelona second round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Slovakia
Age 37
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
IND
Age 41
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2014 | Beijing | ATP 500 | Q2 | Hard | Martin Klizan | 6-2 6-1 | Somdev Devvarman | Match data |
| Apr 23, 2014* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Martin Klizan | 6-2 6-4 | Somdev Devvarman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Klizan | #831 | #24 | 1,445 | 1,979 | 128 | 146 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Somdev Devvarman | #1,347 | #62 | 771 | 1,799 | 49 | 70 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Klizan | Somdev Devvarman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #395 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #155 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1116 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1033 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #204 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #126 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #43 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #108 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #35 | 1,750 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #84 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #141 | 1,755 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #664 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #41 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #90 | 1,741 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,703 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #138 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,649 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #909 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #835 | 1,556 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |