H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Martin Klizan vs Steve Darcis H2H: 1-0
Martin Klizan holds a 1–0 lead over Steve Darcis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Martin Klizan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martin Klizan won the 2014 US Open first round 3-6 2-6 7-6(5) 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Slovakia
Age 37
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2014* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Martin Klizan | 3-6 2-6 7-6(5) 7-5 6-4 | Steve Darcis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Klizan | #831 | #24 | 1,445 | 1,979 | 128 | 146 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Steve Darcis | #756 | #38 | 1,362 | 1,832 | 92 | 122 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Klizan | Steve Darcis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #395 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #155 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #483 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #86 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2014 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #61 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2015 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #43 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #122 | 1,564 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2016 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #35 | 1,750 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2017 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #141 | 1,755 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #88 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2018 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #41 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 | 2012 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2019 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,703 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #164 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,649 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #86 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #86 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #77 | 1,799 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #835 | 1,556 | 0 | 6 | 2019 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #157 | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |