H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Martin Klizan vs Tatsuma Ito H2H: 1-0

Martin Klizan holds a 1–0 lead over Tatsuma Ito in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Martin Klizan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martin Klizan won the 2015 Australian Open first round 7-6(6) 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martin Klizan
Slovakia Age 37 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Tatsuma Ito
JPN Age 38 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martin Klizan #34 7-6(6) 6-2 6-4 Tatsuma Ito #89 Match data Jan 21, 2015* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martin Klizan #831 #24 1,445 1,979 128 147 46.5% 0 0 0 2 4 6
Tatsuma Ito #1,822 #60 725 1,726 28 57 32.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martin Klizan Tatsuma Ito
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2007 1–1 50.0% #395 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2009 0–1 0.0% #234 1,542 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2010 1–2 33.3% #155 1,607 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #313 1,460 0 0
21 2011 0–2 0.0% #117 1,600 0 0 2009 0–2 0.0% #210 1,483 0 0
22 2012 16–14 53.3% #30 1,792 0 1 2010 0–1 0.0% #183 1,491 0 0
23 2013 12–24 33.3% #108 1,690 0 1 2011 2–4 33.3% #122 1,513 0 0
24 2014 23–16 59.0% #34 1,930 0 2 2012 9–13 40.9% #79 1,634 0 0
25 2015 24–27 47.1% #43 1,797 0 3 2013 2–9 18.2% #155 1,617 0 0
26 2016 14–15 48.3% #35 1,752 0 5 2014 3–5 37.5% #93 1,660 0 0
27 2017 10–15 40.0% #141 1,757 0 5 2015 8–11 42.1% #119 1,677 0 0
28 2018 18–9 66.7% #41 1,917 0 6 2016 3–4 42.9% #171 1,671 0 0
29 2019 9–18 33.3% #141 1,701 0 6 2017 0–2 0.0% #153 1,625 0 0
30 2020 0–2 0.0% #151 1,648 0 6 2018 0–1 0.0% #148 1,590 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2019 0–3 0.0% #147 1,586 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2020 1–1 50.0% #186 1,583 0 0
35 2025 0–1 0.0% #835 1,555 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martin Klizan Tatsuma Ito
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2007 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2012 10 6 16 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2013 4 13 17 23.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2011 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
24 2014 8 8 16 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 2012 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9%
25 2015 12 14 26 46.2% 12 11 23 52.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2013 2 7 9 22.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2016 8 12 20 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2017 5 8 13 38.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2015 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2018 6 5 11 54.5% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — 2016 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2019 4 9 13 30.8% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2018 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
35 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 58 79 137 42.3% 66 55 121 54.5% 4 13 17 23.5% — 19 41 60 31.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 12 20 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 271/275 of Martin Klizan's and 84/85 of Tatsuma Ito's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Martin Klizan Tatsuma Ito
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2007 2/2 4.5 5.0 50.7% 64.2% 50.8% 61.7% 45.0% 58.5% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1/1 2.0 3.0 44.4% 64.3% 37.1% 44.4% 30.0% 49.2% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 3/3 4.7 7.3 48.1% 67.9% 41.9% 64.6% 41.1% 54.6% 35.4% 2008 1/1 2.0 4.0 61.5% 43.8% 45.0% 28.6% 20.0% 44.2% 37.3%
21 2011 2/2 1.5 5.5 60.6% 52.6% 35.0% 22.7% 29.2% 45.7% 35.2% 2009 2/2 3.5 3.0 55.7% 63.5% 30.4% 29.8% 75.0% 48.9% 33.3%
22 2012 29/30 3.9 3.5 56.1% 71.1% 50.5% 56.3% 48.2% 62.1% 41.4% 2010 1/1 3.0 2.0 49.2% 63.3% 48.4% 57.1% 33.3% 55.7% 25.5%
23 2013 36/36 6.0 3.9 54.7% 67.3% 48.8% 60.3% 40.6% 58.8% 36.4% 2011 6/6 3.5 3.7 55.2% 63.9% 48.4% 54.0% 24.4% 57.2% 28.9%
24 2014 36/39 5.7 3.2 56.9% 73.3% 52.4% 61.3% 44.3% 63.9% 37.9% 2012 21/22 4.0 3.5 56.3% 66.6% 50.9% 54.8% 40.0% 59.6% 36.5%
25 2015 51/51 4.8 3.6 57.5% 68.9% 48.4% 56.2% 42.0% 60.3% 34.4% 2013 11/11 3.7 3.6 56.7% 66.3% 46.9% 46.9% 38.1% 57.6% 32.9%
26 2016 29/29 4.6 4.4 58.0% 69.6% 49.4% 58.1% 49.6% 60.7% 38.5% 2014 8/8 5.9 3.6 61.4% 67.3% 49.6% 53.3% 41.7% 60.5% 34.2%
27 2017 25/25 3.3 3.3 64.7% 67.0% 50.6% 58.0% 40.2% 61.2% 36.6% 2015 19/19 4.1 2.4 60.5% 71.9% 46.6% 55.8% 30.3% 62.1% 35.4%
28 2018 27/27 4.5 2.4 62.1% 70.2% 55.5% 59.1% 54.5% 64.5% 37.8% 2016 7/7 4.1 3.3 61.9% 66.4% 54.6% 43.5% 71.3% 62.5% 35.8%
29 2019 27/27 4.3 4.5 58.1% 67.0% 47.9% 55.1% 48.2% 58.9% 35.1% 2017 2/2 1.5 3.5 60.9% 65.2% 51.0% 50.0% 16.7% 59.8% 25.5%
30 2020 2/2 5.0 1.5 55.6% 68.0% 47.9% 51.4% 32.5% 59.0% 34.8% 2018 1/1 4.0 6.0 53.3% 67.2% 51.8% 76.5% 38.5% 60.0% 42.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 3/3 4.3 4.3 55.4% 69.1% 44.1% 40.6% 26.3% 57.8% 36.5%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 2/2 7.5 2.5 70.2% 68.1% 43.8% 55.6% 36.4% 60.4% 29.7%
35 2025 1/1 0.0 4.0 64.0% 72.0% 42.0% 56.0% 60.0% 62.0% 29.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 271/275 4.7 3.7 58.0% 69.2% 50.0% 57.8% 45.2% 60.9% 37.0% — 84/85 4.1 3.3 58.5% 67.3% 48.4% 51.6% 38.6% 59.5% 34.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martin Klizan Tatsuma Ito
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2007 1524 104.9 -2.40 -0.79 1.001 50.8% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 1506 98.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1543 104.5 -2.83 -2.96 0.851 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.11 2007 1485 99.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 1607 113.5 +0.26 +1.44 0.780 45.9% — — — 33.3% -0.78 1–1 — — -0.14 2008 1460 95.0 -3.59 -0.51 0.669 40.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.10
21 2011 1601 108.6 -3.98 +3.39 0.648 40.3% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.28 2009 1483 102.7 -1.10 +0.91 0.651 40.8% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.23
22 2012 1793 136.2 -0.83 +2.99 1.092 51.5% -45 -158 -236 52.6% +0.10 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) — +0.80 2010 1492 106.5 -1.95 +7.36 0.576 42.0% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.10
23 2013 1690 141.7 -2.90 -0.83 0.884 48.1% -55 +13 -130 39.3% -0.74 4–11 (27%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.17 2011 1513 111.0 -3.38 -2.91 0.676 43.8% +20 — — 33.3% -1.53 1–1 2–0 — 0.00
24 2014 1930 145.3 +0.98 +1.95 1.050 51.1% -137 +27 -329 56.4% +0.30 10–4 (71%) 11–8 (58%) — -2.11 2012 1635 124.2 -2.45 -0.38 0.904 48.0% -2 -103 -65 39.7% -0.91 4–3 (57%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.56
25 2015 1798 145.6 -2.85 -1.50 0.865 47.5% -11 +44 — 45.3% -0.62 11–6 (65%) 17–5 (77%) — -0.15 2013 1618 116.8 -4.05 -1.85 0.775 45.3% +28 — — 28.6% -1.75 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.28
26 2016 1753 151.0 -1.88 +1.38 0.979 50.0% +2 +114 — 52.2% +0.12 6–7 (46%) 4–6 (40%) — +1.22 2014 1660 123.9 -2.82 -0.02 0.867 47.6% +12 — -29 37.5% -0.25 — 1–3 (25%) — +0.33
27 2017 1757 144.6 -1.26 +0.29 0.943 49.2% -12 +78 — 47.5% +0.03 4–5 (44%) 6–9 (40%) — -0.38 2015 1677 125.3 -2.21 -0.52 0.934 48.3% -19 — +54 40.4% -0.68 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) — +1.59
28 2018 1918 149.4 +0.58 +1.54 1.064 51.4% -96 +77 — 58.2% +0.43 8–2 (80%) 5–3 (63%) — -2.08 2016 1671 118.1 -0.69 +0.33 0.956 49.1% +7 — — 44.4% -0.45 1–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.05
29 2019 1702 134.3 -4.15 -1.03 0.853 47.6% +16 +145 — 37.1% -0.73 4–5 (44%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.18 2017 1626 112.5 -0.78 -3.10 0.634 44.1% — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 — — -0.06
30 2020 1649 111.4 -0.19 -1.33 0.847 45.8% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.18 2018 1591 100.3 -1.04 -2.54 1.065 51.8% — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 0–1 — -0.03
31 2021 1541 88.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1586 115.3 -1.04 -1.28 0.863 46.6% +47 — — 12.5% -1.88 0–1 0–1 — +0.29
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1584 107.5 +1.82 +0.48 0.751 46.0% — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.01
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1510 90.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1486 89.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1556 101.9 -0.23 -0.93 0.763 47.0% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1980 146.1 -1.61 +0.42 0.947 49.3% -39 +43 -241 47.5% -0.22 52–48 (52%) 59–55 (52%) 103.7 -1.16 — 1727 119.8 -2.33 -0.67 0.851 47.0% +6 -103 -18 35.4% -1.04 12–13 (48%) 17–14 (55%) 105.6 +3.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.