H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Martin Klizan vs Thomaz Bellucci H2H: 3-1

Martin Klizan holds a 3–1 lead over Thomaz Bellucci in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Martin Klizan leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martin Klizan won the 2015 Sao Paulo round of 32 5-7 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martin Klizan
Slovakia Age 37 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Thomaz Bellucci
BRA Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martin Klizan #38 5-7 6-3 7-5 Thomaz Bellucci #63 Match data Feb 12, 2015* R32 Sao Paulo ATP 250 Clay
Thomaz Bellucci #108 6-3 6-3 Martin Klizan #97 Match data Mar 1, 2014* QF Sao Paulo ATP 250 Clay
Martin Klizan #40 5-7 6-4 7-6(6) Thomaz Bellucci #114 Match data Aug 7, 2013* R64 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard
Martin Klizan #34 6-3 6-4 Thomaz Bellucci #39 Match data Oct 9, 2012* R64 Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martin Klizan #831 #24 1,445 1,979 128 147 46.5% 0 0 0 2 4 6
Thomaz Bellucci #1,303 #21 1,732 1,932 182 204 47.2% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martin Klizan Thomaz Bellucci
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2007 1–1 50.0% #395 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2009 0–1 0.0% #234 1,542 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2010 1–2 33.3% #155 1,607 0 0 2008 3–12 20.0% #85 1,540 0 0
21 2011 0–2 0.0% #117 1,600 0 0 2009 18–17 51.4% #36 1,781 0 1
22 2012 16–14 53.3% #30 1,792 0 1 2010 32–24 57.1% #31 1,796 0 2
23 2013 12–24 33.3% #108 1,690 0 1 2011 23–24 48.9% #37 1,711 0 2
24 2014 23–16 59.0% #34 1,930 0 2 2012 24–22 52.2% #33 1,819 0 3
25 2015 24–27 47.1% #43 1,797 0 3 2013 7–16 30.4% #125 1,678 0 3
26 2016 14–15 48.3% #35 1,752 0 5 2014 16–13 55.2% #65 1,794 0 3
27 2017 10–15 40.0% #141 1,757 0 5 2015 29–27 51.8% #37 1,854 0 4
28 2018 18–9 66.7% #41 1,917 0 6 2016 17–22 43.6% #61 1,801 0 4
29 2019 9–18 33.3% #141 1,701 0 6 2017 12–20 37.5% #113 1,701 0 4
30 2020 0–2 0.0% #151 1,648 0 6 2018 1–5 16.7% #225 1,659 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2021 0–1 0.0% #449 1,614 0 4
35 2025 0–1 0.0% #835 1,555 0 6 2023 0–1 0.0% #1303 1,603 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martin Klizan Thomaz Bellucci
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2007 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2008 1 8 9 11.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 7 8 15 46.7% 11 9 20 55.0% — — — —
22 2012 10 6 16 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2010 11 13 24 45.8% 19 10 29 65.5% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 2013 4 13 17 23.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2011 7 13 20 35.0% 14 9 23 60.9% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2014 8 8 16 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 2012 10 11 21 47.6% 14 9 23 60.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2015 12 14 26 46.2% 12 11 23 52.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2013 3 7 10 30.0% 4 9 13 30.8% — — — —
26 2016 8 12 20 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 6 5 11 54.5% 10 8 18 55.6% — — — —
27 2017 5 8 13 38.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2015 9 14 23 39.1% 20 11 31 64.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2018 6 5 11 54.5% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — 2016 9 9 18 50.0% 7 11 18 38.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 2019 4 9 13 30.8% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 1 5 6 16.7% 11 13 24 45.8% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2018 — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2023 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 58 79 137 42.3% 66 55 121 54.5% 4 13 17 23.5% — 64 94 158 40.5% 112 98 210 53.3% 6 12 18 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 271/275 of Martin Klizan's and 375/386 of Thomaz Bellucci's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Martin Klizan Thomaz Bellucci
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2007 2/2 4.5 5.0 50.7% 64.2% 50.8% 61.7% 45.0% 58.5% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1/1 2.0 3.0 44.4% 64.3% 37.1% 44.4% 30.0% 49.2% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 3/3 4.7 7.3 48.1% 67.9% 41.9% 64.6% 41.1% 54.6% 35.4% 2008 14/15 6.2 3.5 56.6% 66.0% 50.1% 52.2% 38.9% 58.5% 33.6%
21 2011 2/2 1.5 5.5 60.6% 52.6% 35.0% 22.7% 29.2% 45.7% 35.2% 2009 35/35 6.7 2.6 61.2% 71.4% 51.4% 58.0% 37.9% 63.5% 34.5%
22 2012 29/30 3.9 3.5 56.1% 71.1% 50.5% 56.3% 48.2% 62.1% 41.4% 2010 55/56 7.2 2.8 58.2% 71.4% 50.2% 56.7% 43.0% 62.5% 37.8%
23 2013 36/36 6.0 3.9 54.7% 67.3% 48.8% 60.3% 40.6% 58.8% 36.4% 2011 47/47 6.3 2.7 61.1% 71.6% 49.9% 57.9% 40.4% 63.2% 37.7%
24 2014 36/39 5.7 3.2 56.9% 73.3% 52.4% 61.3% 44.3% 63.9% 37.9% 2012 44/46 5.8 2.8 56.5% 70.7% 52.6% 57.2% 41.6% 62.7% 38.2%
25 2015 51/51 4.8 3.6 57.5% 68.9% 48.4% 56.2% 42.0% 60.3% 34.4% 2013 22/23 6.1 3.5 54.3% 68.1% 51.0% 54.2% 33.5% 60.6% 34.8%
26 2016 29/29 4.6 4.4 58.0% 69.6% 49.4% 58.1% 49.6% 60.7% 38.5% 2014 28/29 6.8 3.3 56.3% 73.0% 51.8% 60.0% 47.9% 63.8% 36.6%
27 2017 25/25 3.3 3.3 64.7% 67.0% 50.6% 58.0% 40.2% 61.2% 36.6% 2015 56/56 5.9 3.5 58.5% 72.0% 52.7% 60.2% 39.5% 63.9% 38.3%
28 2018 27/27 4.5 2.4 62.1% 70.2% 55.5% 59.1% 54.5% 64.5% 37.8% 2016 34/39 4.8 4.1 56.8% 68.9% 51.4% 53.6% 43.7% 61.3% 38.2%
29 2019 27/27 4.3 4.5 58.1% 67.0% 47.9% 55.1% 48.2% 58.9% 35.1% 2017 32/32 4.9 4.3 58.3% 67.2% 51.6% 49.6% 45.3% 60.8% 36.8%
30 2020 2/2 5.0 1.5 55.6% 68.0% 47.9% 51.4% 32.5% 59.0% 34.8% 2018 6/6 4.2 3.3 59.0% 68.8% 49.0% 57.0% 45.5% 60.7% 40.2%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 1/1 3.0 3.0 60.9% 59.5% 44.4% 33.3% 11.1% 53.6% 34.3%
35 2025 1/1 0.0 4.0 64.0% 72.0% 42.0% 56.0% 60.0% 62.0% 29.0% 2023 1/1 0.0 3.0 53.5% 55.3% 51.5% 62.5% 0.0% 53.5% 25.0%
Career — 271/275 4.7 3.7 58.0% 69.2% 50.0% 57.8% 45.2% 60.9% 37.0% — 375/386 6.1 3.2 58.1% 70.5% 51.3% 56.5% 41.2% 62.4% 37.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martin Klizan Thomaz Bellucci
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2007 1524 104.9 -2.40 -0.79 1.001 50.8% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 1506 98.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1543 104.5 -2.83 -2.96 0.851 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.11 2007 1485 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 1607 113.5 +0.26 +1.44 0.780 45.9% — — — 33.3% -0.78 1–1 — — -0.14 2008 1541 122.5 -1.95 -2.46 0.810 46.6% -85 +113 — 34.1% -1.14 0–5 (0%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.12
21 2011 1601 108.6 -3.98 +3.39 0.648 40.3% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.28 2009 1782 138.6 +0.15 -2.07 0.944 49.0% -61 -3 — 50.0% -0.28 6–5 (55%) 10–5 (67%) — +0.66
22 2012 1793 136.2 -0.83 +2.99 1.092 51.5% -45 -158 -236 52.6% +0.10 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) — +0.80 2010 1797 150.7 -0.44 +1.56 1.007 50.0% -63 +117 -167 54.1% +0.16 13–10 (57%) 11–11 (50%) — +0.82
23 2013 1690 141.7 -2.90 -0.83 0.884 48.1% -55 +13 -130 39.3% -0.74 4–11 (27%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.17 2011 1711 145.3 +0.83 +0.14 1.023 50.1% -61 +227 -72 48.4% -0.07 11–11 (50%) 11–13 (46%) — +2.85
24 2014 1930 145.3 +0.98 +1.95 1.050 51.1% -137 +27 -329 56.4% +0.30 10–4 (71%) 11–8 (58%) — -2.11 2012 1819 150.8 +0.10 +1.17 1.023 50.4% -118 +145 — 51.3% +0.08 7–10 (41%) 10–11 (48%) — -0.64
25 2015 1798 145.6 -2.85 -1.50 0.865 47.5% -11 +44 — 45.3% -0.62 11–6 (65%) 17–5 (77%) — -0.15 2013 1679 127.7 -1.87 -1.99 0.883 47.7% -32 +132 — 36.2% -0.97 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.53
26 2016 1753 151.0 -1.88 +1.38 0.979 50.0% +2 +114 — 52.2% +0.12 6–7 (46%) 4–6 (40%) — +1.22 2014 1794 144.9 +0.75 -0.17 1.011 50.2% -16 +20 — 49.3% +0.04 7–5 (58%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.47
27 2017 1757 144.6 -1.26 +0.29 0.943 49.2% -12 +78 — 47.5% +0.03 4–5 (44%) 6–9 (40%) — -0.38 2015 1855 155.7 +0.52 +2.08 1.061 50.9% -84 +107 — 50.4% +0.01 11–10 (52%) 16–13 (55%) — -0.93
28 2018 1918 149.4 +0.58 +1.54 1.064 51.4% -96 +77 — 58.2% +0.43 8–2 (80%) 5–3 (63%) — -2.08 2016 1801 145.0 -1.11 +1.56 0.986 49.7% -29 +10 -201 44.1% -0.39 5–8 (38%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.79
29 2019 1702 134.3 -4.15 -1.03 0.853 47.6% +16 +145 — 37.1% -0.73 4–5 (44%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.18 2017 1702 134.5 -3.07 +0.19 0.937 48.6% -1 +51 — 39.8% -0.67 5–8 (38%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.46
30 2020 1649 111.4 -0.19 -1.33 0.847 45.8% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.18 2018 1660 117.8 -0.83 -0.48 1.024 50.4% — +58 — 38.9% -0.83 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — -0.14
31 2021 1541 88.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1628 104.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1614 102.4 -1.27 +1.41 0.740 44.1% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.03
35 2025 1556 101.9 -0.23 -0.93 0.763 47.0% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.01 2023 1603 103.9 +1.78 -2.27 0.538 41.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.03
Career — 1980 146.1 -1.61 +0.42 0.947 49.3% -39 +43 -241 47.5% -0.22 52–48 (52%) 59–55 (52%) 103.7 -1.16 — 1933 149.6 -0.36 +0.43 0.987 49.7% -63 +93 -139 47.2% -0.22 70–83 (46%) 89–86 (51%) 100.1 +0.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.