H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Martin Klizan vs Yen-Hsun Lu H2H: 0-1

Yen-Hsun Lu holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Klizan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yen-Hsun Lu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yen-Hsun Lu won the 2013 Indian Wells Open second round 7-6(5) 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martin Klizan
Slovakia Age 37 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Yen-Hsun Lu
TPE Age 43 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Yen-Hsun Lu #79 7-6(5) 7-6(5) Martin Klizan #26 Match data Mar 10, 2013* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martin Klizan #831 #24 1,445 1,979 128 147 46.5% 0 0 0 2 4 6
Yen-Hsun Lu #991 #33 1,244 1,856 145 228 38.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martin Klizan Yen-Hsun Lu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2007 1–1 50.0% #395 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2009 0–1 0.0% #234 1,542 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2010 1–2 33.3% #155 1,607 0 0 2004 4–10 28.6% #87 1,455 0 0
21 2011 0–2 0.0% #117 1,600 0 0 2005 3–8 27.3% #158 1,529 0 0
22 2012 16–14 53.3% #30 1,792 0 1 2006 2–7 22.2% #89 1,489 0 0
23 2013 12–24 33.3% #108 1,690 0 1 2007 6–14 30.0% #110 1,500 0 0
24 2014 23–16 59.0% #34 1,930 0 2 2008 9–14 39.1% #64 1,601 0 0
25 2015 24–27 47.1% #43 1,797 0 3 2009 9–22 29.0% #98 1,587 0 0
26 2016 14–15 48.3% #35 1,752 0 5 2010 15–20 42.9% #35 1,708 0 0
27 2017 10–15 40.0% #141 1,757 0 5 2011 11–20 35.5% #82 1,709 0 0
28 2018 18–9 66.7% #41 1,917 0 6 2012 12–18 40.0% #59 1,737 0 0
29 2019 9–18 33.3% #141 1,701 0 6 2013 17–18 48.6% #65 1,765 0 0
30 2020 0–2 0.0% #151 1,648 0 6 2014 24–23 51.1% #38 1,795 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2015 16–22 42.1% #77 1,828 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2016 7–9 43.8% #64 1,801 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2017 9–14 39.1% #71 1,703 0 0
35 2025 0–1 0.0% #835 1,555 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — 2020 0–2 0.0% #1008 1,673 0 0
37 — — — — — — — 2021 1–7 12.5% #568 1,612 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martin Klizan Yen-Hsun Lu
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2007 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
21 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2012 10 6 16 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2006 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 2013 4 13 17 23.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2007 6 11 17 35.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2014 8 8 16 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2008 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
25 2015 12 14 26 46.2% 12 11 23 52.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2009 8 16 24 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 2016 8 12 20 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 10 16 26 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
27 2017 5 8 13 38.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2011 7 14 21 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
28 2018 6 5 11 54.5% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
29 2019 4 9 13 30.8% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 13 14 27 48.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 20 17 37 54.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 12 16 28 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 9 12 21 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
35 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
Career — 58 79 137 42.3% 66 55 121 54.5% 4 13 17 23.5% — — — — — 112 170 282 39.7% 5 20 25 20.0% 27 37 64 42.2% 1 1 2 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 271/275 of Martin Klizan's and 360/373 of Yen-Hsun Lu's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Martin Klizan Yen-Hsun Lu
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2007 2/2 4.5 5.0 50.7% 64.2% 50.8% 61.7% 45.0% 58.5% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1/1 2.0 3.0 44.4% 64.3% 37.1% 44.4% 30.0% 49.2% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 3/3 4.7 7.3 48.1% 67.9% 41.9% 64.6% 41.1% 54.6% 35.4% 2004 13/14 4.2 3.8 60.4% 70.4% 50.3% 56.7% 29.5% 62.4% 32.7%
21 2011 2/2 1.5 5.5 60.6% 52.6% 35.0% 22.7% 29.2% 45.7% 35.2% 2005 10/11 5.6 4.3 58.4% 72.2% 46.4% 47.1% 48.4% 61.6% 35.8%
22 2012 29/30 3.9 3.5 56.1% 71.1% 50.5% 56.3% 48.2% 62.1% 41.4% 2006 8/9 3.9 2.9 61.6% 71.6% 51.5% 45.1% 56.4% 63.7% 33.7%
23 2013 36/36 6.0 3.9 54.7% 67.3% 48.8% 60.3% 40.6% 58.8% 36.4% 2007 20/20 4.0 4.1 59.5% 67.6% 46.0% 56.1% 33.4% 58.9% 34.4%
24 2014 36/39 5.7 3.2 56.9% 73.3% 52.4% 61.3% 44.3% 63.9% 37.9% 2008 20/23 4.3 4.8 60.2% 69.2% 49.2% 59.3% 33.6% 61.2% 34.2%
25 2015 51/51 4.8 3.6 57.5% 68.9% 48.4% 56.2% 42.0% 60.3% 34.4% 2009 31/31 3.2 3.5 61.3% 67.3% 46.3% 53.9% 39.1% 59.1% 35.1%
26 2016 29/29 4.6 4.4 58.0% 69.6% 49.4% 58.1% 49.6% 60.7% 38.5% 2010 35/35 5.3 3.1 59.4% 70.3% 51.7% 57.9% 36.2% 62.7% 35.3%
27 2017 25/25 3.3 3.3 64.7% 67.0% 50.6% 58.0% 40.2% 61.2% 36.6% 2011 31/31 3.2 3.7 60.9% 67.9% 49.4% 57.6% 43.8% 60.5% 33.7%
28 2018 27/27 4.5 2.4 62.1% 70.2% 55.5% 59.1% 54.5% 64.5% 37.8% 2012 29/30 4.5 3.8 60.4% 69.7% 50.4% 55.5% 40.3% 62.1% 34.3%
29 2019 27/27 4.3 4.5 58.1% 67.0% 47.9% 55.1% 48.2% 58.9% 35.1% 2013 34/35 3.9 3.2 62.7% 70.1% 54.1% 54.1% 43.0% 64.0% 39.9%
30 2020 2/2 5.0 1.5 55.6% 68.0% 47.9% 51.4% 32.5% 59.0% 34.8% 2014 45/47 3.8 3.0 64.1% 71.7% 52.7% 64.1% 40.4% 64.8% 35.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 37/38 4.8 2.4 57.8% 70.8% 51.5% 52.9% 40.1% 62.8% 36.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 15/16 6.3 3.5 59.8% 71.6% 52.3% 54.3% 38.4% 63.8% 34.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 23/23 5.2 3.9 58.5% 73.0% 53.6% 54.8% 41.6% 65.1% 37.9%
35 2025 1/1 0.0 4.0 64.0% 72.0% 42.0% 56.0% 60.0% 62.0% 29.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 2/2 3.0 3.5 54.9% 62.8% 44.4% 54.5% 12.5% 54.6% 32.4%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 7/8 2.1 3.0 65.1% 60.2% 45.7% 43.7% 53.6% 55.2% 29.8%
Career — 271/275 4.7 3.7 58.0% 69.2% 50.0% 57.8% 45.2% 60.9% 37.0% — 360/373 4.3 3.4 60.7% 69.9% 50.6% 56.0% 39.9% 62.2% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martin Klizan Yen-Hsun Lu
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2007 1524 104.9 -2.40 -0.79 1.001 50.8% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 1506 98.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1485 100.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1543 104.5 -2.83 -2.96 0.851 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.11 2003 1442 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 1607 113.5 +0.26 +1.44 0.780 45.9% — — — 33.3% -0.78 1–1 — — -0.14 2004 1456 111.8 -0.90 -1.80 0.870 47.4% -24 — +127 32.4% -1.03 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.23
21 2011 1601 108.6 -3.98 +3.39 0.648 40.3% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.28 2005 1529 105.2 -1.75 -1.63 0.935 48.5% -92 — — 37.9% -0.52 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.76
22 2012 1793 136.2 -0.83 +2.99 1.092 51.5% -45 -158 -236 52.6% +0.10 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 97.2 +0.80 2006 1490 101.0 -1.09 -2.45 0.929 48.0% -60 — +138 23.8% -1.57 0–1 1–4 (20%) — +0.44
23 2013 1690 141.7 -2.90 -0.83 0.884 48.1% -55 +13 -130 39.3% -0.74 4–11 (27%) 6–8 (43%) 93.2 +0.17 2007 1501 120.4 -3.97 -1.15 0.837 46.6% -1 — — 31.8% -1.04 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 100.2 +0.38
24 2014 1930 145.3 +0.98 +1.95 1.050 51.1% -137 +27 -329 56.4% +0.30 10–4 (71%) 11–8 (58%) 108.8 -2.11 2008 1601 125.7 -1.79 -1.16 0.883 47.9% +17 — -89 47.4% -0.54 2–5 (29%) 10–2 (83%) 104.7 +0.73
25 2015 1798 145.6 -2.85 -1.50 0.865 47.5% -11 +44 — 45.3% -0.62 11–6 (65%) 17–5 (77%) 110.6 -0.15 2009 1587 133.7 -2.87 -1.18 0.858 47.1% +17 -132 -72 36.8% -0.97 4–8 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 102.4 -0.68
26 2016 1753 151.0 -1.88 +1.38 0.979 50.0% +2 +114 — 52.2% +0.12 6–7 (46%) 4–6 (40%) 99.4 +1.22 2010 1708 134.3 -0.60 -0.59 0.948 48.8% -66 — 0 44.0% -0.57 4–4 (50%) 9–6 (60%) 105.4 +1.46
27 2017 1757 144.6 -1.26 +0.29 0.943 49.2% -12 +78 — 47.5% +0.03 4–5 (44%) 6–9 (40%) 97.8 -0.38 2011 1710 133.3 -2.05 -2.16 0.853 47.4% -62 -270 +28 41.1% -0.77 1–5 (17%) 7–5 (58%) 99.2 -1.26
28 2018 1918 149.4 +0.58 +1.54 1.064 51.4% -96 +77 — 58.2% +0.43 8–2 (80%) 5–3 (63%) 109.8 -2.08 2012 1738 140.5 -0.67 -1.75 0.905 48.3% +2 — -20 42.5% -0.41 5–4 (56%) 8–8 (50%) 100.3 -0.01
29 2019 1702 134.3 -4.15 -1.03 0.853 47.6% +16 +145 — 37.1% -0.73 4–5 (44%) 7–7 (50%) 96.8 -0.18 2013 1765 147.8 +0.73 +1.97 1.108 51.5% -3 -266 -12 51.2% +0.26 3–8 (27%) 6–8 (43%) 95.1 +0.45
30 2020 1649 111.4 -0.19 -1.33 0.847 45.8% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.18 2014 1795 150.6 +0.13 +0.10 1.003 50.0% +19 -310 -17 52.4% +0.03 6–5 (55%) 11–9 (55%) 103.4 +1.57
31 2021 1541 88.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1828 152.3 -0.89 +0.91 0.976 49.4% +7 -314 -2 47.7% -0.12 3–6 (33%) 7–6 (54%) 98.3 -1.54
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1801 147.0 +1.01 -0.51 0.941 49.3% -24 — — 47.5% -0.33 0–3 (0%) 3–3 (50%) 94.9 -1.76
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1703 133.4 +0.54 +0.75 1.087 51.1% -1 — — 43.5% +0.03 2–5 (29%) 3–8 (27%) 92.8 +1.49
35 2025 1556 101.9 -0.23 -0.93 0.763 47.0% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1674 106.0 -0.99 -1.90 0.714 43.3% — — — 16.7% -2.84 0–1 — — +0.06
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1612 125.4 -3.24 -0.96 0.665 43.1% +37 — — 15.0% -2.25 — 0–2 — -0.47
Career — 1980 146.1 -1.61 +0.42 0.947 49.3% -39 +43 -241 47.5% -0.22 52–48 (52%) 59–55 (52%) 103.7 -1.16 — 1856 144.1 -0.96 -0.49 0.937 48.7% -10 -262 +8 42.8% -0.48 33–63 (34%) 77–73 (51%) 97.0 +0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.