H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marty Riessen vs Ray Ruffels H2H: 5-0
Marty Riessen holds a 5–0 lead over Ray Ruffels in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Marty Riessen leads 3–0 on carpet and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Marty Riessen won the 1972 Houston Wct third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 84
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
5
–
0
5 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 80
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 1972* | Houston Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Marty Riessen | 6-4 6-1 | Ray Ruffels | Match data |
| Feb 23, 1972* | Toronto Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Marty Riessen | 6-4 7-6 | Ray Ruffels | Match data |
| Feb 11, 1972* | Philadelphia Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Marty Riessen | 6-4 6-2 | Ray Ruffels | Match data |
| Jul 20, 1971* | Washington Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Marty Riessen | 4-6 6-1 6-3 | Ray Ruffels | Match data |
| Mar 27, 1969* | New York | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Marty Riessen | 6-2 6-1 | Ray Ruffels | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marty Riessen | #382 | #11 | 0 | 2,101 | 533 | 316 | 62.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 15 |
| Ray Ruffels | #482 | #27 | 0 | 1,903 | 246 | 207 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marty Riessen | Ray Ruffels | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 41–19 | 68.3% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 35–21 | 62.5% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 35–22 | 61.4% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 32–32 | 50.0% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1968 | 95–36 | 72.5% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 6 | 1972 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1969 | 47–34 | 58.0% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 7 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,773 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1970 | 52–29 | 64.2% | — | 1,936 | 0 | 9 | 1974 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #76 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1971 | 68–31 | 68.7% | — | 1,984 | 0 | 10 | 1975 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #112 | 1,692 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1972 | 55–28 | 66.3% | — | 1,968 | 0 | 11 | 1976 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,782 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1973 | 46–25 | 64.8% | #13 | 1,858 | 0 | 12 | 1977 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,699 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 1974 | 55–24 | 69.6% | #12 | 1,953 | 0 | 13 | 1978 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,617 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 1975 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #24 | 1,872 | 0 | 14 | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,544 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 1976 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #59 | 1,822 | 0 | 14 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #482 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 1977 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,829 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1978 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,785 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1979 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #37 | 1,831 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1980 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #92 | 1,691 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1981 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #93 | 1,688 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |