H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 13:16 UTC
Matthew Ebden vs Rik De Voest H2H: 1-0
Matthew Ebden holds a 1–0 lead over Rik De Voest in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Matthew Ebden leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Matthew Ebden won the 2013 San Jose third round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 38
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 46
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2013* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Matthew Ebden | 6-2 7-5 | Rik De Voest | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew Ebden | #970 | #39 | 1,134 | 1,849 | 75 | 129 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rik De Voest | #1,088 | #110 | 538 | 1,693 | 19 | 38 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Matthew Ebden | Rik De Voest | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #105 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #207 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #68 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 5–21 | 19.2% | #231 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #105 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #698 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #76 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #236 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2018 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #46 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2019 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #244 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #126 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2021 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #237 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #740 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |