H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Matthew Ebden vs Thiemo de Bakker H2H: 0-1

Thiemo de Bakker holds a 1–0 lead over Matthew Ebden in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thiemo de Bakker leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thiemo de Bakker won the 2016 Sofia round of 32 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Matthew Ebden
AUS Age 38 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Thiemo de Bakker
NED Age 37 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thiemo de Bakker #94 6-4 6-1 Matthew Ebden #104 Match data Feb 4, 2016* R32 Sofia ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Matthew Ebden #970 #39 1,134 1,849 75 129 36.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Thiemo de Bakker #1,382 #40 1,010 1,853 54 80 40.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Matthew Ebden Thiemo de Bakker
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2006 1–1 50.0% #464 1,512 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2007 1–4 20.0% #444 1,502 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2008 1–1 50.0% #249 1,531 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2009 2–3 40.0% #96 1,612 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2010 26–23 53.1% #43 1,763 0 0
22 2010 1–2 33.3% #196 1,526 0 0 2011 2–11 15.4% #223 1,665 0 0
23 2011 10–10 50.0% #86 1,762 0 0 2012 0–2 0.0% #124 1,642 0 0
24 2012 15–23 39.5% #105 1,644 0 0 2013 7–10 41.2% #146 1,683 0 0
25 2013 4–11 26.7% #68 1,634 0 0 2014 7–6 53.8% #144 1,665 0 0
26 2014 5–21 19.2% #231 1,539 0 0 2015 2–5 28.6% #99 1,617 0 0
27 2015 1–6 14.3% #105 1,631 0 0 2016 5–12 29.4% #257 1,582 0 0
28 2016 0–4 0.0% #698 1,573 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2017 9–7 56.2% #76 1,739 0 0 2018 0–1 0.0% #242 1,558 0 0
30 2018 19–22 46.3% #46 1,790 0 0 2019 0–1 0.0% #511 1,536 0 0
31 2019 5–16 23.8% #244 1,654 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2021 6–5 54.5% #237 1,591 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2022 0–1 0.0% #740 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
36 2024 0–1 0.0% — 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Matthew Ebden Thiemo de Bakker
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 16 16 32 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 2010 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2011 1 6 7 14.3% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — —
23 2011 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2012 14 16 30 46.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2013 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 2013 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2014 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2014 4 12 16 25.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
27 2015 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2016 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — —
28 2016 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2018 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2018 12 16 28 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2019 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2019 3 9 12 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 55 89 144 38.2% 1 14 15 6.7% 19 26 45 42.2% — 27 45 72 37.5% 20 24 44 45.5% 7 11 18 38.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 203/203 of Matthew Ebden's and 133/134 of Thiemo de Bakker's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Matthew Ebden Thiemo de Bakker
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 2/2 3.5 3.0 54.6% 74.1% 49.1% 72.9% 41.7% 62.8% 39.2%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 5/5 8.2 1.2 65.7% 71.8% 58.9% 57.1% 49.6% 67.3% 25.6%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/2 7.5 1.0 55.0% 73.1% 56.3% 68.6% 31.3% 66.0% 34.0%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 5/5 5.8 1.4 62.2% 70.1% 51.0% 61.2% 36.1% 62.1% 36.0%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 49/49 9.8 1.6 61.0% 73.7% 53.5% 60.8% 41.7% 65.8% 35.9%
22 2010 3/3 6.3 1.0 66.7% 72.6% 58.1% 64.3% 61.7% 67.6% 31.2% 2011 13/13 6.5 2.8 54.5% 68.0% 48.7% 53.9% 21.4% 59.2% 28.0%
23 2011 20/20 5.8 2.7 61.6% 72.0% 47.9% 47.2% 36.9% 63.0% 35.9% 2012 2/2 5.0 1.0 55.3% 60.2% 42.0% 48.5% 100.0% 52.1% 28.9%
24 2012 38/38 5.4 4.1 62.3% 68.9% 44.8% 52.5% 33.0% 59.8% 34.5% 2013 17/17 6.2 2.0 60.6% 69.6% 45.6% 62.0% 41.5% 60.2% 34.7%
25 2013 15/15 5.6 5.7 56.5% 73.1% 45.0% 50.4% 30.9% 61.0% 34.2% 2014 12/13 8.7 2.2 57.1% 77.0% 47.1% 64.2% 26.3% 64.1% 33.6%
26 2014 26/26 4.4 6.2 57.7% 68.5% 39.2% 44.0% 37.7% 55.6% 32.2% 2015 7/7 9.0 2.0 54.3% 74.6% 49.2% 59.1% 37.8% 63.0% 34.9%
27 2015 7/7 7.1 5.0 58.8% 71.7% 51.1% 63.2% 44.0% 62.9% 32.2% 2016 17/17 7.2 1.5 60.3% 70.5% 47.1% 49.0% 36.1% 61.3% 33.8%
28 2016 4/4 2.8 3.8 53.6% 51.5% 39.7% 44.0% 45.5% 46.2% 25.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 16/16 4.7 4.4 64.7% 71.6% 47.8% 54.0% 39.3% 63.1% 38.2% 2018 1/1 4.0 3.0 71.7% 60.6% 15.4% 33.3% — 47.8% 15.8%
30 2018 41/41 7.5 5.3 59.7% 72.5% 50.1% 59.9% 42.6% 63.3% 35.2% 2019 1/1 9.0 4.0 58.2% 68.8% 17.4% 69.2% — 47.3% 21.4%
31 2019 21/21 7.0 6.0 59.8% 71.7% 42.0% 54.0% 46.1% 59.9% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 11/11 4.3 3.3 62.6% 71.7% 48.9% 64.3% 49.0% 62.5% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1/1 5.0 3.0 69.2% 83.3% 54.2% 0.0% 50.0% 74.4% 27.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 203/204 5.8 4.7 60.4% 70.7% 46.0% 53.2% 39.6% 60.8% 34.5% — 133/134 8.1 1.8 59.5% 72.0% 49.7% 58.8% 37.6% 63.0% 33.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Matthew Ebden Thiemo de Bakker
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1513 104.7 -0.21 +0.15 1.055 51.5% — — — 60.0% +0.20 0–1 — — -0.08
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1502 115.2 -0.81 -3.06 0.782 47.1% — — — 35.7% -0.79 0–2 4–3 (57%) — -0.08
19 2007 1500 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1532 107.0 -0.17 -0.92 1.000 50.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 0–1 — +0.11
20 2008 1486 97.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1612 119.7 +1.05 -2.08 0.949 49.0% — — — 41.7% -0.58 1–1 2–2 (50%) — 0.00
21 2009 1490 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1764 149.9 +1.79 +0.33 1.050 50.7% -70 +14 -122 50.8% +0.25 7–5 (58%) 11–16 (41%) — +0.27
22 2010 1526 117.9 +1.93 +0.66 0.965 49.8% +20 — — 28.6% -0.57 — — — -0.49 2011 1665 125.5 -1.60 -4.74 0.686 44.4% -43 +82 — 27.0% -1.97 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.54
23 2011 1762 127.8 +1.26 -1.35 0.971 49.6% -32 — -47 44.4% -0.42 4–1 (80%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.59 2012 1642 103.3 -3.01 -3.23 0.604 41.7% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — 0–1 — -0.03
24 2012 1645 128.5 -2.57 -1.66 0.858 47.3% +15 -179 +28 39.8% -0.69 9–5 (64%) 8–4 (67%) — -0.07 2013 1684 129.6 -1.39 -1.41 0.871 47.6% -45 +78 -77 37.8% -0.81 2–1 (67%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.74
25 2013 1635 122.7 -1.51 -1.64 0.876 47.9% +18 — — 31.6% -1.24 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.71 2014 1665 127.0 +0.17 -1.17 0.935 48.9% +12 — — 48.1% -0.19 2–1 (67%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.61
26 2014 1540 122.0 -6.43 -2.74 0.726 44.3% +30 -112 +36 26.2% -1.63 3–4 (43%) 1–5 (17%) — -0.48 2015 1618 116.8 +1.14 -1.79 0.944 49.0% — +111 — 41.2% -0.17 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.19
27 2015 1631 122.0 -2.35 -0.31 0.869 48.1% -24 — +48 30.0% -0.35 0–3 (0%) 0–6 (0%) — +0.22 2016 1583 124.7 -1.66 -1.23 0.874 47.5% +82 +70 — 34.9% -1.05 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.71
28 2016 1573 113.0 -4.76 -3.67 0.476 37.3% -25 — — 12.5% -3.13 — — — +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 1739 127.4 -1.27 +2.03 1.034 50.6% -69 — +46 50.0% +0.21 5–1 (83%) 2–5 (29%) — +1.33 2018 1558 101.5 -1.76 -3.04 0.303 33.3% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06
30 2018 1791 148.3 -0.68 +0.04 0.958 49.3% -42 — +64 47.1% -0.21 6–6 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.04 2019 1536 99.8 +0.16 -1.51 0.406 36.1% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.04
31 2019 1654 126.9 -3.44 +0.06 0.888 47.9% +33 — +98 33.3% -0.87 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 1631 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 1592 115.4 +0.31 -1.06 0.910 49.0% +57 — — 61.9% +0.67 2–1 (67%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1527 96.8 -2.43 +2.78 1.068 50.0% — — — 0.0% -1.00 — 0–2 — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1527 107.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1849 131.9 -2.03 -0.86 0.881 47.9% -1 -137 +45 39.0% -0.67 33–31 (52%) 29–43 (40%) 97.8 +0.25 — 1854 134.5 +0.13 -1.17 0.910 48.5% -29 +62 -104 41.6% -0.54 18–21 (46%) 33–36 (48%) 101.5 -0.74

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.