H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Matthew Ebden vs Yuki Bhambri H2H: 1-0
Matthew Ebden holds a 1–0 lead over Yuki Bhambri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Matthew Ebden leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Matthew Ebden won the 2021 Singapore third round 6-3 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 38
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
IND
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2021* | Singapore | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Matthew Ebden | 6-3 7-6(3) | Yuki Bhambri | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew Ebden | #970 | #39 | 1,134 | 1,849 | 75 | 129 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Yuki Bhambri | #1,185 | #83 | 688 | 1,747 | 15 | 26 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Matthew Ebden | Yuki Bhambri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #505 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #345 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #217 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #249 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #93 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #532 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #105 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #116 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #68 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 5–21 | 19.2% | #231 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #105 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #698 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1048 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #76 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #551 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2018 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #46 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #244 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2021 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #237 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #740 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |