H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Matthew Ebden vs Yuki Bhambri H2H: 1-0

Matthew Ebden holds a 1–0 lead over Yuki Bhambri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Matthew Ebden leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Matthew Ebden won the 2021 Singapore round of 32 6-3 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Matthew Ebden
AUS Age 38 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Yuki Bhambri
IND Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Matthew Ebden #316 6-3 7-6(3) Yuki Bhambri Match data Feb 25, 2021* R32 Singapore ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Matthew Ebden #970 #39 1,134 1,849 75 129 36.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Yuki Bhambri #1,185 #83 688 1,748 14 26 35.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Matthew Ebden Yuki Bhambri
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2009 0–1 0.0% #335 1,466 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2010 1–1 50.0% #505 1,471 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2011 0–1 0.0% #345 1,461 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2012 1–1 50.0% #217 1,482 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2013 0–1 0.0% #195 1,455 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2014 2–1 66.7% #249 1,478 0 0
22 2010 1–2 33.3% #196 1,526 0 0 2015 0–1 0.0% #93 1,508 0 0
23 2011 10–10 50.0% #86 1,762 0 0 2016 0–3 0.0% #532 1,494 0 0
24 2012 15–23 39.5% #105 1,644 0 0 2017 5–3 62.5% #116 1,626 0 0
25 2013 4–11 26.7% #68 1,634 0 0 2018 4–10 28.6% #137 1,650 0 0
26 2014 5–21 19.2% #231 1,539 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2015 1–6 14.3% #105 1,631 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2016 0–4 0.0% #698 1,573 0 0 2021 0–2 0.0% #1048 1,647 0 0
29 2017 9–7 56.2% #76 1,739 0 0 2022 1–1 50.0% #551 1,600 0 0
30 2018 19–22 46.3% #46 1,790 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2019 5–16 23.8% #244 1,654 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2021 6–5 54.5% #237 1,591 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2022 0–1 0.0% #740 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
36 2024 0–1 0.0% — 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Matthew Ebden Yuki Bhambri
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
22 2010 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2011 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2016 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2012 14 16 30 46.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2017 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — —
25 2013 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2018 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 2014 4 12 16 25.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2021 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2017 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2022 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2018 12 16 28 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 3 9 12 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 55 89 144 38.2% 1 14 15 6.7% 19 26 45 42.2% — 14 22 36 38.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Matthew Ebden Yuki Bhambri
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 1/1 0.0 6.0 52.3% 61.8% 48.4% 50.0% 14.3% 55.4% 32.8%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 2/2 1.5 4.5 67.5% 61.2% 38.2% 16.7% 100.0% 53.8% 51.5%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 1/1 2.0 3.0 55.8% 45.8% 36.8% 40.0% 100.0% 41.9% 27.8%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 2/2 2.0 2.0 59.7% 65.2% 52.9% 16.7% 19.2% 60.6% 37.2%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 1/1 8.0 3.0 67.2% 69.2% 47.4% 71.4% 0.0% 62.1% 27.9%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 3/3 1.7 2.3 56.5% 70.7% 57.3% 41.3% 75.0% 64.9% 35.9%
22 2010 3/3 6.3 1.0 66.7% 72.6% 58.1% 64.3% 61.7% 67.6% 31.2% 2015 1/1 5.0 3.0 66.7% 60.5% 47.4% 33.3% 40.0% 56.1% 26.1%
23 2011 20/20 5.8 2.7 61.6% 72.0% 47.9% 47.2% 36.9% 63.0% 35.9% 2016 3/3 2.7 4.7 61.0% 58.5% 44.9% 45.0% 39.4% 53.3% 35.0%
24 2012 38/38 5.4 4.1 62.3% 68.9% 44.8% 52.5% 33.0% 59.8% 34.5% 2017 8/8 2.5 2.6 67.0% 71.6% 57.3% 49.1% 37.5% 66.5% 43.3%
25 2013 15/15 5.6 5.7 56.5% 73.1% 45.0% 50.4% 30.9% 61.0% 34.2% 2018 14/14 1.7 3.9 65.7% 61.7% 48.7% 46.1% 42.6% 57.0% 37.8%
26 2014 26/26 4.4 6.2 57.7% 68.5% 39.2% 44.0% 37.7% 55.6% 32.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 7/7 7.1 5.0 58.8% 71.7% 51.1% 63.2% 44.0% 62.9% 32.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 4/4 2.8 3.8 53.6% 51.5% 39.7% 44.0% 45.5% 46.2% 25.6% 2021 2/2 3.5 3.5 60.3% 64.8% 53.3% 25.0% 29.2% 60.2% 29.9%
29 2017 16/16 4.7 4.4 64.7% 71.6% 47.8% 54.0% 39.3% 63.1% 38.2% 2022 2/2 2.5 5.0 61.6% 74.9% 37.1% 56.9% 27.8% 60.2% 34.9%
30 2018 41/41 7.5 5.3 59.7% 72.5% 50.1% 59.9% 42.6% 63.3% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 21/21 7.0 6.0 59.8% 71.7% 42.0% 54.0% 46.1% 59.9% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 11/11 4.3 3.3 62.6% 71.7% 48.9% 64.3% 49.0% 62.5% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1/1 5.0 3.0 69.2% 83.3% 54.2% 0.0% 50.0% 74.4% 27.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 203/204 5.8 4.7 60.4% 70.7% 46.0% 53.2% 39.6% 60.8% 34.5% — 40/40 2.3 3.5 63.7% 64.8% 49.8% 43.1% 43.6% 59.2% 37.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Matthew Ebden Yuki Bhambri
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1515 100.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1498 98.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1466 95.6 -2.33 -6.46 0.734 44.7% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.26
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1472 107.9 +1.11 +1.91 1.114 52.9% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — +0.14
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1461 96.5 -1.76 -0.29 0.478 35.4% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.12
19 2007 1500 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1483 102.9 -1.91 +0.44 0.944 48.2% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.08
20 2008 1486 97.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1456 103.0 -1.01 -1.29 0.737 43.7% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.02
21 2009 1490 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1478 105.4 +0.07 -1.36 1.025 50.6% +9 — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.03
22 2010 1526 117.9 +1.93 +0.66 0.965 49.8% +20 — — 28.6% -0.57 — — — -0.49 2015 1509 114.9 +4.75 +1.60 0.595 42.7% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.17
23 2011 1762 127.8 +1.26 -1.35 0.971 49.6% -32 — -47 44.4% -0.42 4–1 (80%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.59 2016 1495 115.5 -3.69 +0.13 0.748 44.1% +18 — — 12.5% -2.25 0–1 0–2 — -0.06
24 2012 1645 128.5 -2.57 -1.66 0.858 47.3% +15 -179 +28 39.8% -0.69 9–5 (64%) 8–4 (67%) — -0.07 2017 1626 125.9 +1.77 +2.75 1.294 54.2% +33 — — 55.6% +0.89 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +0.77
25 2013 1635 122.7 -1.51 -1.64 0.876 47.9% +18 — — 31.6% -1.24 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.71 2018 1651 125.9 -4.83 +1.41 0.878 47.7% +58 — -70 35.3% -0.85 0–3 (0%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.44
26 2014 1540 122.0 -6.43 -2.74 0.726 44.3% +30 -112 +36 26.2% -1.63 3–4 (43%) 1–5 (17%) — -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 1631 122.0 -2.35 -0.31 0.869 48.1% -24 — +48 30.0% -0.35 0–3 (0%) 0–6 (0%) — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 1573 113.0 -4.76 -3.67 0.476 37.3% -25 — — 12.5% -3.13 — — — +0.28 2021 1647 108.6 -1.25 -1.03 0.751 45.7% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — +0.07
29 2017 1739 127.4 -1.27 +2.03 1.034 50.6% -69 — +46 50.0% +0.21 5–1 (83%) 2–5 (29%) — +1.33 2022 1601 98.5 -1.99 -2.44 0.878 47.7% — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 0–1 — +0.43
30 2018 1791 148.3 -0.68 +0.04 0.958 49.3% -42 — +64 47.1% -0.21 6–6 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.04 2023 1563 103.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 1654 126.9 -3.44 +0.06 0.888 47.9% +33 — +98 33.3% -0.87 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 1631 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 1592 115.4 +0.31 -1.06 0.910 49.0% +57 — — 61.9% +0.67 2–1 (67%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1527 96.8 -2.43 +2.78 1.068 50.0% — — — 0.0% -1.00 — 0–2 — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1527 107.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1849 131.9 -2.03 -0.86 0.881 47.9% -1 -137 +45 39.0% -0.67 33–31 (52%) 29–43 (40%) 97.8 +0.25 — 1748 119.7 -1.82 +0.73 0.926 48.5% +39 — -70 35.2% -0.72 3–7 (30%) 1–10 (9%) 90.3 +5.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.