H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Matthias Bachinger vs Matthew Ebden H2H: 0-2
Matthew Ebden holds a 2–0 lead over Matthias Bachinger in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Matthew Ebden leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Matthew Ebden won the 2012 Queen's Club second round 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 38
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2015 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Q1 | Hard | Matthias Bachinger | 4-6 7-6(7) 6-3 | Matthew Ebden | Match data |
| Jun 13, 2012* | Queen's Club | ATP 500 | R64 | Grass | Matthew Ebden | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Matthias Bachinger | Match data |
| Jul 8, 2011* | Newport | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Matthew Ebden | 2-6 6-4 6-4 | Matthias Bachinger | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthias Bachinger | #1,763 | #85 | 625 | 1,770 | 31 | 55 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Matthew Ebden | #970 | #39 | 1,134 | 1,849 | 75 | 129 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Matthias Bachinger | Matthew Ebden | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #187 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #94 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #105 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #123 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #68 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #159 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–21 | 19.2% | #231 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #141 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #105 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #698 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #493 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #76 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #46 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #130 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #244 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #223 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #237 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #740 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |