H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Matthias Bachinger vs Tobias Kamke H2H: 0-1
Tobias Kamke holds a 1–0 lead over Matthias Bachinger in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tobias Kamke leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tobias Kamke won the 2010 Vienna third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 40
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2016 | Munich | ATP 250 | Q2 | Clay | Matthias Bachinger | 7-5 6-1 | Tobias Kamke | Match data |
| Oct 28, 2010* | Vienna | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Tobias Kamke | 6-4 6-4 | Matthias Bachinger | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthias Bachinger | #1,763 | #85 | 625 | 1,770 | 31 | 55 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tobias Kamke | #1,114 | #64 | 744 | 1,764 | 60 | 99 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Matthias Bachinger | Tobias Kamke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #187 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #94 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #123 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #96 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #159 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #98 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #141 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #97 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #493 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #277 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #130 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #223 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |