H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Michael Llodra vs Marco Chiudinelli H2H: 1-2
Marco Chiudinelli holds a 2–1 lead over Michael Llodra in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marco Chiudinelli leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Llodra won the 2012 Marseille third round 7-6(2) 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 46
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 44
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2012* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Michael Llodra | 7-6(2) 7-6(3) | Marco Chiudinelli | Match data |
| Oct 7, 2010* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Marco Chiudinelli | 6-3 6-0 | Michael Llodra | Match data |
| Feb 11, 2010* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Marco Chiudinelli | 6-1 6-7(5) 7-6(6) | Michael Llodra | Match data |
| Aug 10, 2009 | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Michael Llodra | 5-7 7-6(1) 6-2 | Marco Chiudinelli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Llodra | #631 | #21 | 1,575 | 1,901 | 182 | 215 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Marco Chiudinelli | #1,153 | #52 | 816 | 1,792 | 44 | 85 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Llodra | Marco Chiudinelli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2000 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #159 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2001 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #89 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #289 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #104 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #142 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #173 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #287 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #41 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #155 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #487 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #605 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #93 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #56 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #40 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #117 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2009 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #67 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #177 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2010 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #23 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2011 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #47 | 1,776 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2012 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,842 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #105 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #282 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #269 | 1,688 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |