Michael Russell
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donald Young | 5 | 1 | 6 | Mar 8, 2014 | H2H |
| Sam Querrey | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jul 30, 2014 | H2H |
| John Isner | 0 | 4 | 4 | Feb 20, 2014 | H2H |
| Lleyton Hewitt | 1 | 3 | 4 | Feb 15, 2014 | H2H |
| Dmitry Tursunov | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jan 15, 2014 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Michael Russell vs Adrian Menendez Maceiras H2H: 1-0
Michael Russell holds a 1–0 lead over Adrian Menendez Maceiras in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michael Russell leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Michael Russell won the 2012 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-1 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Russell | 6-3 6-1 7-6(7) | Adrian Menendez Maceiras | Match data | Jun 27, 2012* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Russell | #1,124 | #60 | 693 | 1,809 | 77 | 150 | 33.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Adrian Menendez Maceiras | — | — | — | 1,644 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Michael Russell | Adrian Menendez Maceiras | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #155 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #87 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #157 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #502 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #82 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #242 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #83 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #99 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #92 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #158 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #557 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Michael Russell | Adrian Menendez Maceiras | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | ||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1998 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 2000 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2013 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 2002 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 8 | 8 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2017 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 2003 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2019 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 10 | 15 | 25 | 40.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 55 | 92 | 147 | 37.4% | 12 | 35 | 47 | 25.5% | 10 | 23 | 33 | 30.3% | Career | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
Performance Progression by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 221/227 of Michael Russell's and 24/24 of Adrian Menendez Maceiras's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Michael Russell | Adrian Menendez Maceiras | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% |
| 1998 | 1/2 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 62.7% | 65.8% | 51.1% | 37.5% | 30.0% | 60.3% | 37.7% | 2012 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 57.6% | 61.4% | 45.2% | 50.0% | 20.0% | 54.5% | 27.3% |
| 2000 | 6/7 | 3.8 | 6.5 | 61.4% | 65.1% | 45.0% | 50.8% | 61.1% | 57.3% | 37.1% | 2013 | 2/2 | 6.0 | 2.5 | 62.0% | 54.0% | 41.9% | 54.2% | 25.0% | 49.3% | 25.7% |
| 2001 | 23/25 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 68.9% | 63.2% | 46.6% | 46.6% | 39.5% | 57.9% | 38.3% | 2015 | 5/5 | 6.0 | 3.2 | 58.6% | 68.8% | 51.3% | 57.4% | 54.9% | 61.5% | 30.9% |
| 2002 | 18/20 | 1.9 | 2.5 | 69.4% | 60.3% | 48.8% | 54.0% | 33.9% | 56.8% | 37.1% | 2017 | 6/6 | 5.0 | 1.7 | 61.5% | 69.1% | 47.8% | 48.6% | 38.5% | 61.8% | 33.5% |
| 2003 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 4.5 | 67.5% | 66.0% | 49.4% | 73.3% | 35.4% | 60.5% | 39.0% | 2018 | 6/6 | 3.7 | 2.0 | 63.8% | 65.7% | 46.2% | 56.4% | 40.0% | 58.1% | 33.1% |
| 2006 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 4.0 | 66.0% | 58.1% | 43.8% | 46.9% | 39.6% | 53.1% | 39.4% | 2019 | 4/4 | 4.0 | 2.8 | 58.7% | 62.7% | 45.2% | 43.3% | 45.9% | 55.4% | 32.5% |
| 2007 | 29/29 | 2.0 | 2.6 | 68.1% | 65.3% | 47.3% | 53.1% | 44.2% | 59.4% | 34.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 8/8 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 66.4% | 64.4% | 51.9% | 54.5% | 46.5% | 60.3% | 41.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 6/6 | 1.8 | 2.7 | 69.8% | 63.9% | 51.0% | 57.2% | 33.1% | 59.6% | 38.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 34/34 | 2.8 | 3.4 | 65.1% | 63.6% | 49.0% | 48.2% | 39.5% | 58.7% | 35.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 30/30 | 2.9 | 4.2 | 63.3% | 70.0% | 47.0% | 48.6% | 46.5% | 61.2% | 35.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 22/22 | 3.0 | 3.8 | 63.7% | 67.2% | 50.5% | 46.4% | 51.2% | 61.0% | 37.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 22/22 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 64.2% | 65.6% | 47.0% | 47.6% | 40.4% | 58.9% | 36.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 17/17 | 2.3 | 3.4 | 62.5% | 64.5% | 48.4% | 51.8% | 39.0% | 58.9% | 36.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 1/1 | 4.0 | 7.0 | 62.7% | 54.2% | 42.1% | 60.9% | 23.5% | 49.7% | 40.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Michael Russell | Adrian Menendez Maceiras | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1998 | 1473 | 105.5 | -1.20 | -1.55 | 0.950 | 48.8% | — | — | — | 16.7% | -1.50 | — | — | — | +0.13 | 2007 | 1472 | 97.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 1507 | 103.7 | -2.23 | -1.34 | 0.871 | 47.5% | — | -15 | — | 33.3% | -1.14 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–3 (25%) | 93.5 | +0.65 | 2008 | 1448 | 96.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 1573 | 122.4 | -1.89 | +0.09 | 0.908 | 47.9% | -32 | +20 | — | 36.5% | -0.84 | 2–5 (29%) | 3–6 (33%) | 97.0 | -0.46 | 2009 | 1427 | 100.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 1512 | 111.5 | -4.18 | -0.10 | 0.860 | 47.1% | +27 | -42 | +56 | 30.6% | -1.31 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–5 (38%) | 97.2 | 0.00 | 2010 | 1407 | 101.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 1530 | 108.4 | 0.00 | +2.07 | 0.988 | 49.6% | — | — | — | 60.0% | -0.20 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.19 | 2011 | 1425 | 100.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 1548 | 105.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1499 | 98.1 | -0.33 | -2.29 | 0.600 | 41.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.01 |
| 2006 | 1563 | 110.1 | -2.13 | -0.63 | 0.839 | 46.4% | — | — | — | 25.0% | -1.00 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.01 | 2013 | 1574 | 109.6 | -2.38 | -2.31 | 0.508 | 38.5% | — | — | — | 16.7% | -3.17 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.10 |
| 2007 | 1617 | 131.4 | -2.18 | -0.79 | 0.851 | 47.4% | +33 | -140 | -127 | 37.5% | -0.66 | 3–3 (50%) | 5–6 (45%) | 99.8 | -1.61 | 2014 | 1563 | 107.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 1610 | 122.6 | -0.43 | +2.15 | 1.039 | 50.9% | +29 | — | — | 40.9% | -0.14 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | +0.39 | 2015 | 1610 | 113.9 | -2.56 | -4.46 | 0.803 | 46.7% | -2 | — | — | 35.7% | -1.07 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.22 |
| 2009 | 1636 | 122.0 | -2.07 | +1.17 | 0.956 | 49.0% | +31 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.50 | 0–4 (0%) | 2–1 (67%) | 95.6 | -0.14 | 2016 | 1588 | 109.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 1629 | 131.7 | -3.68 | -0.27 | 0.871 | 47.2% | +47 | -171 | -147 | 37.2% | -0.87 | 3–7 (30%) | 4–8 (33%) | 94.3 | -0.38 | 2017 | 1607 | 112.5 | -1.85 | -1.76 | 0.877 | 47.9% | +51 | — | — | 43.8% | -0.69 | 0–2 | 3–2 (60%) | — | +0.66 |
| 2011 | 1748 | 137.8 | -1.30 | -0.31 | 0.912 | 48.4% | +61 | -283 | -272 | 38.0% | -0.62 | 3–2 (60%) | 4–10 (29%) | 97.8 | -0.97 | 2018 | 1604 | 116.5 | -2.99 | -1.63 | 0.789 | 46.5% | +59 | — | — | 40.0% | -1.33 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 100.4 | +0.09 |
| 2012 | 1750 | 129.2 | -1.23 | -0.23 | 0.964 | 49.4% | -28 | -166 | -145 | 48.3% | -0.12 | 5–3 (63%) | 3–5 (38%) | 100.9 | -0.09 | 2019 | 1598 | 111.3 | -3.29 | -1.62 | 0.729 | 44.2% | — | — | — | 30.0% | -1.10 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.06 |
| 2013 | 1639 | 129.7 | -3.05 | -0.32 | 0.880 | 47.7% | +17 | -109 | +24 | 37.5% | -0.88 | 3–3 (50%) | 4–2 (67%) | 102.9 | +0.09 | 2020 | 1584 | 101.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 1582 | 133.8 | -3.02 | -0.10 | 0.891 | 47.9% | +93 | -76 | — | 41.3% | -0.72 | 2–5 (29%) | 5–1 (83%) | 101.9 | +0.34 | 2021 | 1558 | 98.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 1611 | 117.2 | +1.80 | +0.23 | 0.798 | 45.5% | — | — | — | 25.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1810 | 133.9 | -2.37 | -0.17 | 0.897 | 48.0% | +30 | -88 | -82 | 38.4% | -0.75 | 23–41 (36%) | 35–48 (42%) | 91.4 | -1.05 | Career | 1645 | 111.3 | -2.50 | -2.33 | 0.764 | 45.6% | +38 | — | — | 34.4% | -1.33 | 3–8 (27%) | 9–7 (56%) | 98.7 | +3.83 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Adrian Menendez Maceiras
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeremy Chardy | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 7, 2019 | — |
| Taro Daniel | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 12, 2019 | — |
| Fernando Verdasco | 1 | 0 | 1 | Apr 11, 2019 | — |
| Christopher Eubanks | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 14, 2019 | — |
| Denis Shapovalov | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 20, 2018 | — |