H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Michael Stich vs Ronald Agenor H2H: 1-3
Ronald Agenor holds a 3–1 lead over Michael Stich in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Ronald Agenor leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ronald Agenor won the 1994 Milan fourth round 6-2 6-7(3) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
HAI
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 1994* | Milan | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Ronald Agenor | 6-2 6-7(3) 6-3 | Michael Stich | Match data |
| Feb 3, 1994* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Michael Stich | 6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-3 | Ronald Agenor | Match data |
| Jan 7, 1994* | Doha | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Ronald Agenor | 5-7 6-4 6-4 | Michael Stich | Match data |
| Jul 27, 1989* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ronald Agenor | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Michael Stich | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Stich | #116 | #2 | 3,445 | 2,119 | 350 | 162 | 68.4% | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 18 |
| Ronald Agenor | #1,507 | #22 | 984 | 1,895 | 215 | 251 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Stich | Ronald Agenor | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #100 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #49 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #42 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #74 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 68–23 | 74.7% | #4 | 1,989 | 1 | 5 | 1987 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #15 | 2,016 | 1 | 7 | 1988 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #28 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 67–19 | 77.9% | #2 | 2,082 | 1 | 13 | 1989 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #37 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1994 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 1,925 | 1 | 16 | 1990 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #29 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1995 | 39–18 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,895 | 1 | 17 | 1991 | 16–27 | 37.2% | #74 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1996 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,828 | 1 | 18 | 1992 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #132 | 1,538 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1997 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #64 | 1,842 | 1 | 18 | 1993 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #58 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,528 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #96 | 1,522 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #137 | 1,430 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,466 | 0 | 3 |