H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Michal Przysiezny vs Dudi Sela H2H: 0-1
Dudi Sela holds a 1–0 lead over Michal Przysiezny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dudi Sela leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Dudi Sela won the 2014 Newport third round 6-1 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 41
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2014* | Newport | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Dudi Sela | 6-1 7-6(2) | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dudi Sela | #1,031 | #29 | 1,397 | 1,802 | 120 | 168 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Michal Przysiezny | Dudi Sela | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #64 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #112 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #75 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #83 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #109 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #73 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #98 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #100 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #96 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #67 | 1,789 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #236 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |