H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Michal Przysiezny vs Jiri Vanek H2H: 1-0
Michal Przysiezny holds a 1–0 lead over Jiri Vanek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michal Przysiezny leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Michal Przysiezny won the 2006 Sopot fourth round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2006* | Sopot | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Michal Przysiezny | 6-3 6-1 | Jiri Vanek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jiri Vanek | #1,543 | #74 | 796 | 1,644 | 67 | 120 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Michal Przysiezny | Jiri Vanek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #495 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #143 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #115 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #99 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #102 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #101 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #124 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |