H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Michal Przysiezny vs Martin Fischer H2H: 1-0
Michal Przysiezny holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Fischer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michal Przysiezny leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michal Przysiezny won the 2011 Johannesburg third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 39
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2013* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q2 | Clay | Michal Przysiezny | 4-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | Martin Fischer | Match data |
| Feb 3, 2011* | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Michal Przysiezny | 6-1 6-2 | Martin Fischer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Martin Fischer | #1,005 | #117 | 467 | 1,691 | 2 | 19 | 9.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Michal Przysiezny | Martin Fischer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #133 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #219 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #299 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #705 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |