H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Mikael Ymer vs Henri Laaksonen H2H: 0-1
Henri Laaksonen holds a 1–0 lead over Mikael Ymer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Henri Laaksonen leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Henri Laaksonen won the 2017 Bastad third round 7-6(5) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Sweden
Age 27
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2019 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q3 | Clay | Mikael Ymer | 6-1 2-6 6-2 | Henri Laaksonen | Match data |
| Jul 20, 2017* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Henri Laaksonen | 7-6(5) 7-5 | Mikael Ymer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikael Ymer | #626 | #50 | 981 | 1,861 | 58 | 74 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Henri Laaksonen | #1,622 | #84 | 798 | 1,830 | 37 | 64 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mikael Ymer | Henri Laaksonen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #596 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #497 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2017 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #255 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #94 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #244 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #94 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #318 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #69 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #136 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #627 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #104 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #134 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #98 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #172 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |