H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Victor Hanescu H2H: 4-5

Victor Hanescu holds a 5–4 lead over Mikhail Youzhny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Victor Hanescu leads 3–2 on clay, while they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Victor Hanescu won the 2015 Indian Wells Masters first round 6-3 6-4.

RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 5
9 main draw meetings
ROU Age 44 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 14, 2015* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Victor Hanescu #146 6-3 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #64 Match data
Jul 27, 2013* Gstaad ATP 250 SF Clay Mikhail Youzhny #33 6-3 6-3 Victor Hanescu #54 Match data
Apr 26, 2013* Bucharest ATP 250 R16 Clay Victor Hanescu #55 6-4 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #30 Match data
Oct 30, 2010* St. Petersburg ATP 250 QF Hard Mikhail Youzhny #10 6-7(5) 6-3 7-6(6) Victor Hanescu #52 Match data
Aug 18, 2009* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #64 7-5 6-2 Victor Hanescu #28 Match data
May 28, 2009* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Victor Hanescu #33 7-5 7-5 7-5 Mikhail Youzhny #42 Match data
Jan 9, 2009* Doha ATP 250 R16 Hard Victor Hanescu #48 6-2 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #39 Match data
Jul 20, 2007* Amersfoort ATP 250 R16 Clay Mikhail Youzhny #13 6-4 6-2 Victor Hanescu #272 Match data
May 7, 2003* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Victor Hanescu #132 7-6(1) 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #31 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Victor Hanescu #1,025 #26 1,671 1,843 186 226 45.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Victor Hanescu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1 2002 3–3 50.0% #172 1,520 0 0
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 2003 13–12 52.0% #70 1,667 0 0
22 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2 2004 17–23 42.5% #92 1,572 0 0
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2 2005 25–22 53.2% #35 1,727 0 0
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2 2006 0–6 0.0% #646 1,652 0 0
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3 2007 7–7 50.0% #76 1,683 0 0
26 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4 2008 20–21 48.8% #50 1,756 0 1
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5 2009 26–30 46.4% #48 1,705 0 1
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7 2010 23–24 48.9% #51 1,706 0 1
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7 2011 16–24 40.0% #90 1,687 0 1
30 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8 2012 6–13 31.6% #62 1,618 0 1
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10 2013 18–25 41.9% #80 1,689 0 1
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10 2014 11–15 42.3% #122 1,735 0 1
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10 2015 1–1 50.0% #279 1,655 0 1
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10