H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Milos Raonic vs Evgeny Donskoy H2H: 1-0
Milos Raonic holds a 1–0 lead over Evgeny Donskoy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Milos Raonic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2015 St. Petersburg fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 36
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2015* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Milos Raonic | 6-4 6-4 | Evgeny Donskoy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milos Raonic | #634 | #3 | 5,450 | 2,246 | 369 | 186 | 66.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Evgeny Donskoy | #1,380 | #65 | 764 | 1,791 | 50 | 111 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Milos Raonic | Evgeny Donskoy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #514 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #156 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #259 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #11 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #81 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #8 | 2,087 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #113 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,047 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,143 | 0 | 8 | 2015 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #24 | 2,053 | 0 | 8 | 2016 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #125 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,952 | 0 | 8 | 2017 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #72 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #31 | 1,919 | 0 | 8 | 2018 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #97 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2020 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #14 | 1,996 | 0 | 8 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2021 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #70 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #123 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #172 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,909 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2024 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #238 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |