H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Milos Raonic vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 7-0

Milos Raonic holds a 7–0 lead over Jeremy Chardy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Milos Raonic leads 5–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2018 Miami Open fourth round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Milos Raonic
CAN Age 35 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
7 – 0
7 main-draw meetings
Jeremy Chardy
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Milos Raonic #25 6-3 6-4 Jeremy Chardy #90 Match data Mar 28, 2018* R16 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Milos Raonic #6 6-1 5-7 7-6(3) Jeremy Chardy #38 Match data Mar 30, 2015* R32 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Milos Raonic #10 6-3 5-7 6-2 Jeremy Chardy #47 Match data May 17, 2014* QF Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Milos Raonic #9 6-3 6-3 Jeremy Chardy #49 Match data May 7, 2014* R32 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Milos Raonic #11 6-4 6-3 Jeremy Chardy #38 Match data Oct 4, 2013* R16 Japan Open ATP 500 Hard
Milos Raonic #13 6-3 4-6 7-5 Jeremy Chardy #28 Match data Aug 7, 2013* R64 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard
Milos Raonic #14 6-7(4) 7-6(4) 6-3 Jeremy Chardy #34 Match data Nov 1, 2012* R32 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Milos Raonic #634 #3 5,450 2,248 370 188 66.3% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,967 293 304 49.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Milos Raonic Jeremy Chardy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2009 0–1 0.0% #373 1,535 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2010 3–4 42.9% #156 1,651 0 0 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,546 0 0
20 2011 30–18 62.5% #31 1,834 0 1 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0
21 2012 43–21 67.2% #13 1,980 0 3 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,682 0 0
22 2013 41–21 66.1% #11 2,036 0 5 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,783 0 1
23 2014 47–20 70.1% #8 2,088 0 6 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,829 0 1
24 2015 32–15 68.1% #14 2,048 0 7 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,729 0 1
25 2016 52–19 73.2% #3 2,162 0 8 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,823 0 1
26 2017 29–14 67.4% #24 2,078 0 8 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,798 0 1
27 2018 31–18 63.3% #18 1,975 0 8 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1
28 2019 23–13 63.9% #31 1,934 0 8 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,897 0 1
29 2020 23–10 69.7% #14 2,016 0 8 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1
30 2021 6–4 60.0% #70 1,978 0 8 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,781 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1
32 2023 4–4 50.0% #317 1,918 0 8 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,917 0 1
33 2024 6–6 50.0% #238 1,897 0 8 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2021 20–18 52.6% #107 1,794 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,733 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Milos Raonic Jeremy Chardy
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
20 2011 20 10 30 66.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 2012 31 12 43 72.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2013 33 13 46 71.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2009 17 17 34 50.0% 15 8 23 65.2% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2014 31 13 44 70.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 2010 14 15 29 48.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 2015 24 11 35 68.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 2011 4 10 14 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2016 32 13 45 71.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 10 2 12 83.3% 2012 10 10 20 50.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2017 14 7 21 66.7% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 2013 10 14 24 41.7% 8 9 17 47.1% 4 2 6 66.7%
27 2018 18 13 31 58.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 3 12 75.0% 2014 18 15 33 54.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 2019 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — 8 3 11 72.7% 2015 20 17 37 54.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2020 22 9 31 71.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2016 9 12 21 42.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 2021 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 11 12 23 47.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 13 15 28 46.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0%
32 2023 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 2019 16 14 30 53.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
33 2024 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2020 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 15 9 24 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 254 125 379 67.0% 62 36 98 63.3% 54 27 81 66.7% — 164 171 335 49.0% 100 99 199 50.3% 29 34 63 46.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 537/558 of Milos Raonic's and 591/597 of Jeremy Chardy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Milos Raonic Jeremy Chardy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2009 1/1 20.0 3.0 58.2% 85.9% 45.7% 85.7% 20.0% 69.1% 33.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 7/7 14.0 3.7 59.6% 79.1% 45.1% 63.7% 22.7% 65.7% 28.0% 2006 4/4 3.8 5.5 60.9% 63.7% 43.3% 46.2% 47.8% 55.6% 42.3%
20 2011 47/48 13.6 2.2 63.9% 78.9% 54.7% 66.3% 42.8% 70.1% 33.8% 2007 3/3 7.7 3.0 57.6% 70.9% 47.9% 53.3% 32.6% 61.0% 31.3%
21 2012 60/64 16.2 3.3 61.3% 82.6% 57.2% 70.4% 46.2% 73.2% 34.7% 2008 19/19 10.2 5.2 62.0% 75.6% 51.4% 58.1% 39.3% 66.2% 32.6%
22 2013 60/62 14.7 3.0 62.9% 82.8% 54.1% 66.2% 39.3% 72.2% 33.6% 2009 62/62 8.6 3.3 58.9% 75.0% 53.0% 60.5% 39.4% 65.8% 34.5%
23 2014 67/67 16.5 3.1 61.4% 82.6% 55.3% 66.1% 43.1% 72.0% 33.9% 2010 52/52 8.3 3.5 57.7% 73.6% 49.1% 58.1% 38.6% 63.2% 35.9%
24 2015 47/47 15.8 3.0 63.0% 81.5% 58.3% 75.5% 32.7% 73.0% 31.0% 2011 26/26 6.7 4.3 57.2% 72.5% 44.6% 58.5% 37.2% 60.6% 33.1%
25 2016 69/71 12.7 3.3 63.9% 80.9% 56.9% 69.0% 40.5% 72.2% 36.6% 2012 44/44 7.4 4.1 56.7% 74.1% 50.2% 68.3% 39.9% 63.8% 37.0%
26 2017 40/43 14.2 3.5 63.3% 80.4% 57.1% 65.3% 42.0% 71.8% 35.6% 2013 47/47 8.3 5.2 60.9% 73.7% 49.2% 61.8% 37.3% 64.2% 34.8%
27 2018 45/49 17.5 4.0 63.2% 83.4% 58.0% 57.4% 35.7% 74.2% 34.0% 2014 60/60 8.5 4.0 58.9% 76.2% 51.5% 61.6% 40.3% 66.0% 35.5%
28 2019 34/36 19.7 3.7 62.9% 84.7% 57.2% 63.3% 35.8% 74.5% 34.7% 2015 54/54 7.5 4.3 62.0% 75.1% 52.9% 60.3% 39.9% 66.6% 35.6%
29 2020 32/33 16.5 3.4 63.0% 84.0% 56.9% 78.8% 40.7% 74.0% 36.0% 2016 38/38 8.1 5.1 59.0% 74.8% 49.8% 54.7% 45.4% 64.6% 37.8%
30 2021 10/10 16.6 5.1 60.3% 80.5% 57.8% 64.1% 42.8% 71.4% 37.4% 2017 37/38 7.8 4.3 63.2% 73.3% 48.9% 60.4% 37.1% 64.5% 36.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 45/45 8.5 4.2 63.1% 75.8% 49.3% 59.0% 36.1% 66.0% 34.3%
32 2023 8/8 17.8 6.1 60.8% 82.6% 46.8% 70.2% 37.0% 68.5% 29.8% 2019 55/55 9.2 4.0 62.6% 73.6% 48.6% 63.4% 39.5% 64.3% 34.6%
33 2024 10/12 16.7 3.2 62.3% 83.2% 57.4% 52.9% 23.8% 73.2% 32.5% 2020 7/7 8.0 5.7 60.7% 70.7% 43.6% 54.5% 24.6% 60.0% 34.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 33/38 6.1 4.1 62.1% 69.6% 48.7% 53.1% 47.3% 61.6% 33.9%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 5/5 3.0 8.2 63.6% 60.5% 38.6% 49.4% 54.0% 52.0% 30.9%
Career — 537/558 15.6 3.3 62.7% 82.0% 56.2% 67.4% 39.7% 72.4% 34.3% — 591/597 8.0 4.2 60.3% 74.0% 49.8% 60.0% 39.6% 64.4% 35.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Milos Raonic Jeremy Chardy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2008 1488 99.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 1535 118.1 +0.53 +4.04 1.069 51.1% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — -0.13 2005 1511 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 1652 123.4 +0.54 -3.37 0.816 47.5% +23 — — 42.1% -0.74 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 104.5 +0.22 2006 1547 109.6 -0.01 -0.38 0.953 48.3% — +18 — 54.5% +0.18 — 0–1 — -0.22
20 2011 1835 152.5 +5.93 -1.86 1.129 51.6% +62 -201 -204 61.2% +0.49 10–7 (59%) 22–12 (65%) 106.1 +0.34 2007 1563 110.4 -0.05 -2.80 0.804 46.1% — — — 14.3% -1.71 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.03
21 2012 1980 165.4 +9.03 -1.07 1.292 53.5% +43 -208 -253 65.4% +0.85 8–9 (47%) 27–22 (55%) 103.6 +1.28 2008 1682 127.9 +1.67 -2.03 0.965 49.3% -129 +32 — 45.6% +0.05 7–1 (88%) 5–12 (29%) 104.0 -0.36
22 2013 2037 163.9 +7.91 -1.26 1.212 52.2% +56 -201 -372 62.5% +0.72 9–5 (64%) 19–17 (53%) 102.0 +1.75 2009 1784 150.0 +2.44 -0.94 1.011 50.2% -58 +89 -176 51.0% +0.02 11–6 (65%) 17–14 (55%) 108.8 -2.59
23 2014 2089 170.2 +7.97 -0.86 1.213 52.8% +12 -85 -241 66.9% +0.85 11–7 (61%) 38–13 (75%) 110.3 +3.89 2010 1829 151.4 +0.53 +0.22 0.977 49.5% -15 -14 -202 46.7% -0.29 6–6 (50%) 14–9 (61%) 105.6 -2.43
24 2015 2048 167.3 +7.76 -2.58 1.147 52.1% +48 -7 -157 62.1% +0.81 12–4 (75%) 22–19 (54%) 103.8 +1.09 2011 1730 130.1 -0.73 -3.31 0.842 47.4% +14 +22 — 34.4% -1.00 1–5 (17%) 5–6 (45%) 93.3 -0.53
25 2016 2163 173.6 +8.50 +1.49 1.313 53.6% -7 -113 -8 69.4% +1.00 12–6 (67%) 27–14 (66%) 109.4 -1.03 2012 1824 146.0 +0.74 -0.29 1.023 50.5% -35 -27 -210 52.8% +0.08 5–5 (50%) 10–9 (53%) 101.5 +1.81
26 2017 2079 162.7 +6.78 +0.23 1.261 53.2% +49 -42 +25 66.7% +0.92 4–1 (80%) 16–11 (59%) 103.2 -0.68 2013 1798 148.4 +0.56 -0.91 0.973 49.5% -1 -38 -80 48.4% -0.05 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) 99.8 +2.11
27 2018 1975 153.8 +8.35 -0.88 1.318 53.1% +7 +61 +177 64.0% +0.70 5–5 (50%) 18–11 (62%) 100.1 +1.79 2014 1860 155.3 +2.21 +0.27 1.044 50.4% -17 -23 -33 52.6% +0.05 10–8 (56%) 20–20 (50%) 102.1 +0.64
28 2019 1934 154.2 +7.20 -0.04 1.360 53.8% +1 — +195 67.8% +0.93 3–6 (33%) 19–9 (68%) 98.3 +1.72 2015 1897 159.6 +2.09 +0.92 1.065 50.9% -10 -37 — 50.4% +0.06 7–10 (41%) 13–16 (45%) 97.1 -0.92
29 2020 2017 164.6 +7.82 +0.28 1.382 54.3% +17 — — 72.2% +1.32 2–5 (29%) 13–8 (62%) 96.3 +0.12 2016 1753 145.0 +0.78 +1.08 1.065 50.9% -18 +104 +1 47.4% +0.14 4–6 (40%) 5–12 (29%) 91.1 +2.28
30 2021 1979 139.0 +4.52 +0.69 1.309 53.5% +19 — — 62.1% +0.96 0–2 2–4 (33%) — +0.31 2017 1781 145.1 +0.66 +0.08 1.015 50.0% +8 +40 -55 42.2% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 7–7 (50%) 100.7 -1.26
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1830 155.4 +2.05 -0.91 1.008 50.0% -17 +15 -13 49.6% +0.03 9–4 (69%) 12–9 (57%) 106.3 -1.20
32 2023 1919 127.9 +2.47 -1.58 0.944 49.3% +65 — +186 45.5% -0.23 1–0 3–4 (43%) — -0.07 2019 1918 154.7 +0.56 -0.62 0.971 49.5% -20 -38 -152 49.0% +0.12 15–9 (63%) 14–26 (35%) 98.6 -2.48
33 2024 1898 124.3 +5.72 -1.03 1.214 51.5% +70 — +199 61.9% +0.71 2–1 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 98.8 -0.82 2020 1786 126.6 -0.59 -0.34 0.856 47.3% +42 — — 30.0% -1.05 1–1 0–1 — -1.08
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1795 146.5 -0.75 -1.52 0.882 48.1% +76 -33 -95 46.9% -0.40 12–6 (67%) 15–8 (65%) 106.9 -2.92
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1733 104.8 -3.39 -1.83 0.643 42.4% — — — 21.4% -2.21 — — — -0.32
Career — 2248 169.1 +7.54 -0.67 1.241 52.8% +29 -114 -17 64.8% +0.80 81–60 (57%) 232–150 (61%) 107.6 +1.81 — 1967 154.7 +1.06 -0.45 0.988 49.7% -13 +5 -91 47.8% -0.12 100–82 (55%) 150–162 (48%) 102.9 -1.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.