H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Milos Raonic vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 1-0
Milos Raonic holds a 1–0 lead over Michal Przysiezny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Milos Raonic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2013 Shanghai Masters second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2013* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Milos Raonic | 6-4 6-4 | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milos Raonic | #634 | #3 | 5,450 | 2,246 | 369 | 186 | 66.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Milos Raonic | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #156 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #11 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #8 | 2,087 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,047 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,143 | 0 | 8 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #24 | 2,053 | 0 | 8 | 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,952 | 0 | 8 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #31 | 1,919 | 0 | 8 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #14 | 1,996 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #70 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,909 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #238 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |