H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Milos Raonic vs Pablo Cuevas H2H: 3-0

Milos Raonic holds a 3–0 lead over Pablo Cuevas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Milos Raonic leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2016 Paris Masters third round 4-6 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Milos Raonic
CAN Age 35 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Pablo Cuevas
URU Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Milos Raonic #5 4-6 6-1 6-2 Pablo Cuevas #22 Match data Nov 4, 2016* R16 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Milos Raonic #12 7-5 2-6 7-6(5) Pablo Cuevas #25 Match data Apr 13, 2016* R32 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Milos Raonic #9 6-3 6-2 Pablo Cuevas #161 Match data May 2, 2014* R16 Estoril Open ATP 250 Clay
Pablo Cuevas #70 1-6 6-4 7-5 Milos Raonic #156 Match data Oct 31, 2010 Q1 Q Valencia ATP 500 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Milos Raonic #634 #3 5,450 2,248 370 188 66.3% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Pablo Cuevas #841 #19 1,865 1,960 212 213 49.9% 0 0 0 1 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Milos Raonic Pablo Cuevas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2009 0–1 0.0% #373 1,535 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2010 3–4 42.9% #156 1,651 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2011 30–18 62.5% #31 1,834 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2012 43–21 67.2% #13 1,980 0 3 2007 0–1 0.0% #113 1,551 0 0
22 2013 41–21 66.1% #11 2,036 0 5 2008 8–13 38.1% #142 1,633 0 0
23 2014 47–20 70.1% #8 2,088 0 6 2009 18–15 54.5% #50 1,745 0 0
24 2015 32–15 68.1% #14 2,048 0 7 2010 20–22 47.6% #63 1,760 0 0
25 2016 52–19 73.2% #3 2,162 0 8 2011 11–13 45.8% #142 1,743 0 0
26 2017 29–14 67.4% #24 2,078 0 8 — — — — — — —
27 2018 31–18 63.3% #18 1,975 0 8 2013 2–4 33.3% #220 1,716 0 0
28 2019 23–13 63.9% #31 1,934 0 8 2014 17–12 58.6% #30 1,843 0 2
29 2020 23–10 69.7% #14 2,016 0 8 2015 28–25 52.8% #40 1,815 0 3
30 2021 6–4 60.0% #70 1,978 0 8 2016 34–23 59.6% #22 1,810 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 2017 20–21 48.8% #32 1,787 0 6
32 2023 4–4 50.0% #317 1,918 0 8 2018 13–14 48.1% #88 1,766 0 6
33 2024 6–6 50.0% #238 1,897 0 8 2019 22–23 48.9% #45 1,741 0 6
34 — — — — — — — 2020 7–10 41.2% #67 1,691 0 6
35 — — — — — — — 2021 9–11 45.0% #97 1,651 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2022 3–6 33.3% #269 1,654 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Milos Raonic Pablo Cuevas
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 20 10 30 66.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 31 12 43 72.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2013 33 13 46 71.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2008 1 2 3 33.3% 7 11 18 38.9% — — — —
23 2014 31 13 44 70.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 2009 5 6 11 45.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2015 24 11 35 68.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 2010 8 9 17 47.1% 12 13 25 48.0% — — — —
25 2016 32 13 45 71.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 10 2 12 83.3% 2011 3 4 7 42.9% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — —
26 2017 14 7 21 66.7% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2018 18 13 31 58.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 3 12 75.0% 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2019 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — 8 3 11 72.7% 2014 4 5 9 44.4% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2020 22 9 31 71.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2015 8 13 21 38.1% 19 9 28 67.9% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2021 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 9 13 22 40.9% 21 8 29 72.4% 4 2 6 66.7%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 6 11 17 35.3% 14 10 24 58.3% — — — —
32 2023 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 2018 4 3 7 57.1% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2024 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2019 3 9 12 25.0% 18 12 30 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 3 4 25.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 3 3 6 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — —
Career — 254 125 379 67.0% 62 36 98 63.3% 54 27 81 66.7% — 56 86 142 39.4% 149 116 265 56.2% 7 11 18 38.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 537/558 of Milos Raonic's and 421/425 of Pablo Cuevas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Milos Raonic Pablo Cuevas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2009 1/1 20.0 3.0 58.2% 85.9% 45.7% 85.7% 20.0% 69.1% 33.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 7/7 14.0 3.7 59.6% 79.1% 45.1% 63.7% 22.7% 65.7% 28.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 47/48 13.6 2.2 63.9% 78.9% 54.7% 66.3% 42.8% 70.1% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 60/64 16.2 3.3 61.3% 82.6% 57.2% 70.4% 46.2% 73.2% 34.7% 2007 1/1 1.0 5.0 43.6% 50.0% 40.9% 58.8% 14.3% 44.9% 34.6%
22 2013 60/62 14.7 3.0 62.9% 82.8% 54.1% 66.2% 39.3% 72.2% 33.6% 2008 21/21 4.1 1.9 59.3% 63.2% 54.4% 55.2% 37.5% 59.5% 35.1%
23 2014 67/67 16.5 3.1 61.4% 82.6% 55.3% 66.1% 43.1% 72.0% 33.9% 2009 33/33 7.5 2.2 63.6% 72.0% 51.8% 60.2% 47.4% 64.8% 34.6%
24 2015 47/47 15.8 3.0 63.0% 81.5% 58.3% 75.5% 32.7% 73.0% 31.0% 2010 41/42 4.7 2.2 61.6% 68.2% 47.5% 50.4% 40.6% 60.3% 37.2%
25 2016 69/71 12.7 3.3 63.9% 80.9% 56.9% 69.0% 40.5% 72.2% 36.6% 2011 24/24 5.4 1.7 59.8% 72.3% 56.0% 58.0% 41.2% 65.9% 37.8%
26 2017 40/43 14.2 3.5 63.3% 80.4% 57.1% 65.3% 42.0% 71.8% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2018 45/49 17.5 4.0 63.2% 83.4% 58.0% 57.4% 35.7% 74.2% 34.0% 2013 6/6 5.8 4.0 57.6% 69.0% 46.5% 67.5% 32.5% 59.5% 31.7%
28 2019 34/36 19.7 3.7 62.9% 84.7% 57.2% 63.3% 35.8% 74.5% 34.7% 2014 29/29 5.7 3.1 60.1% 72.0% 52.7% 47.6% 37.7% 64.2% 39.5%
29 2020 32/33 16.5 3.4 63.0% 84.0% 56.9% 78.8% 40.7% 74.0% 36.0% 2015 53/53 5.8 2.8 60.5% 71.4% 52.5% 64.8% 42.6% 63.7% 37.5%
30 2021 10/10 16.6 5.1 60.3% 80.5% 57.8% 64.1% 42.8% 71.4% 37.4% 2016 55/57 7.6 2.9 60.3% 75.8% 55.2% 62.3% 42.7% 67.5% 36.5%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 41/41 5.3 3.6 59.0% 72.6% 51.0% 59.7% 42.4% 63.7% 36.3%
32 2023 8/8 17.8 6.1 60.8% 82.6% 46.8% 70.2% 37.0% 68.5% 29.8% 2018 27/27 6.2 3.3 60.2% 74.3% 55.2% 57.1% 37.9% 66.4% 36.6%
33 2024 10/12 16.7 3.2 62.3% 83.2% 57.4% 52.9% 23.8% 73.2% 32.5% 2019 45/45 5.5 3.0 58.9% 74.2% 52.7% 54.8% 44.8% 65.5% 36.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 17/17 5.9 3.5 60.3% 70.5% 49.4% 60.5% 33.6% 62.2% 35.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 20/20 4.8 2.5 68.9% 70.3% 50.2% 58.6% 43.1% 63.8% 35.6%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 8/9 2.8 1.9 66.8% 67.4% 53.2% 60.2% 47.2% 63.3% 37.4%
Career — 537/558 15.6 3.3 62.7% 82.0% 56.2% 67.4% 39.7% 72.4% 34.3% — 421/425 5.8 2.8 60.8% 71.7% 52.3% 58.1% 41.6% 64.1% 36.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Milos Raonic Pablo Cuevas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2008 1488 99.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 1535 118.1 +0.53 +4.04 1.069 51.1% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 1652 123.4 +0.54 -3.37 0.816 47.5% +23 — — 42.1% -0.74 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 1835 152.5 +5.93 -1.86 1.129 51.6% +62 -201 -204 61.2% +0.49 10–7 (59%) 22–12 (65%) — +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 1980 165.4 +9.03 -1.07 1.292 53.5% +43 -208 -253 65.4% +0.85 8–9 (47%) 27–22 (55%) — +1.28 2007 1551 110.8 +3.13 +0.76 0.628 39.7% — — — 0.0% -4.33 — — — -0.20
22 2013 2037 163.9 +7.91 -1.26 1.212 52.2% +56 -201 -372 62.5% +0.72 9–5 (64%) 19–17 (53%) — +1.75 2008 1633 124.3 -1.73 -1.88 0.867 47.8% +1 -44 — 37.5% -0.81 2–2 (50%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.48
23 2014 2089 170.2 +7.97 -0.86 1.213 52.8% +12 -85 -241 66.9% +0.85 11–7 (61%) 38–13 (75%) — +3.89 2009 1745 137.5 +0.89 -2.33 0.983 50.1% -71 +96 — 55.4% +0.08 6–6 (50%) 7–2 (78%) — +1.03
24 2015 2048 167.3 +7.76 -2.58 1.147 52.1% +48 -7 -157 62.1% +0.81 12–4 (75%) 22–19 (54%) — +1.09 2010 1761 136.7 -1.96 -0.08 0.937 48.6% -45 +38 — 48.9% -0.46 4–4 (50%) 15–2 (88%) — +0.76
25 2016 2163 173.6 +8.50 +1.49 1.313 53.6% -7 -113 -8 69.4% +1.00 12–6 (67%) 27–14 (66%) — -1.03 2011 1743 138.9 +2.31 +0.26 1.110 51.3% -28 +9 — 52.6% +0.12 2–7 (22%) 6–4 (60%) — -0.08
26 2017 2079 162.7 +6.78 +0.23 1.261 53.2% +49 -42 +25 66.7% +0.92 4–1 (80%) 16–11 (59%) — -0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2018 1975 153.8 +8.35 -0.88 1.318 53.1% +7 +61 +177 64.0% +0.70 5–5 (50%) 18–11 (62%) — +1.79 2013 1717 114.3 -1.40 -3.04 0.783 46.7% -23 — — 43.8% -1.13 1–1 1–1 — +0.05
28 2019 1934 154.2 +7.20 -0.04 1.360 53.8% +1 — +195 67.8% +0.93 3–6 (33%) 19–9 (68%) — +1.72 2014 1843 147.6 +0.35 +2.31 1.103 51.7% -117 +98 — 54.7% +0.27 7–6 (54%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.40
29 2020 2017 164.6 +7.82 +0.28 1.382 54.3% +17 — — 72.2% +1.32 2–5 (29%) 13–8 (62%) — +0.12 2015 1815 156.3 +0.03 +1.37 1.032 50.7% -98 +211 -198 50.7% +0.06 9–11 (45%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.40
30 2021 1979 139.0 +4.52 +0.69 1.309 53.5% +19 — — 62.1% +0.96 0–2 2–4 (33%) — +0.31 2016 1810 152.1 +3.77 +0.09 1.125 51.7% -111 +203 -133 57.5% +0.44 12–10 (55%) 19–20 (49%) — +2.40
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1788 154.1 +0.80 -0.10 0.998 49.9% -91 +130 — 47.6% -0.14 9–7 (56%) 9–12 (43%) — +1.79
32 2023 1919 127.9 +2.47 -1.58 0.944 49.3% +65 — +186 45.5% -0.23 1–0 3–4 (43%) — -0.07 2018 1767 142.3 +1.63 +0.47 1.090 51.2% -24 +67 — 47.0% +0.24 4–4 (50%) 6–14 (30%) — +0.81
33 2024 1898 124.3 +5.72 -1.03 1.214 51.5% +70 — +199 61.9% +0.71 2–1 (67%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.82 2019 1741 144.0 +1.27 -0.02 1.050 50.6% -34 +106 -89 49.1% +0.03 7–8 (47%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.69
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1692 131.9 -0.42 -0.37 0.941 48.8% -54 +121 — 42.6% -0.34 3–4 (43%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.62
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1652 127.3 +0.69 -1.10 0.984 49.6% -2 +108 — 45.1% -0.25 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.71
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1654 112.6 +0.30 -1.95 1.017 50.8% — +63 — 41.7% -0.08 1–2 (33%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.50
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1612 96.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1580 89.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2248 169.1 +7.54 -0.67 1.241 52.8% +29 -114 -17 64.8% +0.80 81–60 (57%) 232–150 (61%) 107.6 +1.81 — 1960 148.4 +0.77 -0.05 1.019 50.3% -70 +102 -143 49.9% -0.03 68–74 (48%) 100–95 (51%) 98.5 +1.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.