H2H data updated: 2026-07-26 01:16 UTC
Mirza Basic vs Juan Monaco H2H: 0-1
Juan Monaco holds a 1–0 lead over Mirza Basic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Juan Monaco leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Monaco won the 2016 Rio de Janeiro Olympics second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Bosnia-Herzegovina
Age 35
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 42
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2016* | Rio de Janeiro Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Juan Monaco | 6-2 6-2 | Mirza Basic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirza Basic | #480 | #74 | 733 | 1,773 | 22 | 28 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Juan Monaco | #226 | #10 | 2,775 | 2,052 | 321 | 259 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mirza Basic | Juan Monaco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #73 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #248 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #85 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #23 | 1,864 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #181 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #46 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2017 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #138 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,851 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2018 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #87 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #26 | 1,837 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #26 | 1,940 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,935 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #42 | 1,806 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2022 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #392 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #62 | 1,855 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #53 | 1,810 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #65 | 1,874 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,813 | 0 | 8 |