H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Mirza Basic vs Marius Copil H2H: 1-1
Mirza Basic and Marius Copil are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Marius Copil won the 2018 Washington second round 7-6(9) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Bosnia-Herzegovina
Age 35
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 35
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2018* | Washington | ATP 500 | R64 | Hard | Marius Copil | 7-6(9) 6-4 | Mirza Basic | Match data |
| Feb 11, 2018* | Sofia | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Mirza Basic | 7-6(6) 6-7(4) 6-4 | Marius Copil | Match data |
| Jan 19, 2016* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Q2 | Hard | Mirza Basic | 6-3 7-6(1) | Marius Copil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirza Basic | #480 | #74 | 733 | 1,773 | 22 | 27 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Marius Copil | #1,021 | #56 | 888 | 1,811 | 47 | 81 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mirza Basic | Marius Copil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #467 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #248 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #147 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #165 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #138 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #87 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,809 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #153 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #392 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #374 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |