H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mischa Zverev vs Henri Laaksonen H2H: 1-0
Mischa Zverev holds a 1–0 lead over Henri Laaksonen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mischa Zverev leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mischa Zverev won the 2017 Metz fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2017* | Metz | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mischa Zverev | 6-4 6-4 | Henri Laaksonen | Match data |
| Sep 26, 2016 | Shenzhen | ATP 250 | Q2 | Hard | Mischa Zverev | 6-2 6-4 | Henri Laaksonen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mischa Zverev | #1,373 | #25 | 1,664 | 2,007 | 134 | 199 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Henri Laaksonen | #1,622 | #84 | 798 | 1,830 | 37 | 64 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mischa Zverev | Henri Laaksonen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2007 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #80 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #244 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #318 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 2–18 | 10.0% | #211 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #176 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #171 | 1,839 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #104 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #51 | 1,917 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #134 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #33 | 1,850 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #98 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2018 | 19–29 | 39.6% | #69 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #172 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2019 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #281 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #264 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |