H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Mischa Zverev vs Marcos Daniel H2H: 1-0
Mischa Zverev holds a 1–0 lead over Marcos Daniel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mischa Zverev leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mischa Zverev won the 2008 Umag fourth round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 48
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2008* | Umag | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Mischa Zverev | 6-4 6-2 | Marcos Daniel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mischa Zverev | #1,373 | #25 | 1,664 | 2,007 | 134 | 199 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Marcos Daniel | #904 | #56 | 942 | 1,649 | 20 | 63 | 24.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mischa Zverev | Marcos Daniel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2007 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #80 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2009 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 2–18 | 10.0% | #211 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #169 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #176 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #94 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #171 | 1,839 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #165 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #51 | 1,917 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #33 | 1,850 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #87 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2018 | 19–29 | 39.6% | #69 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #87 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2019 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #281 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2020 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #264 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #904 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |