H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Nicolas Devilder vs Rik De Voest H2H: 1-0
Nicolas Devilder holds a 1–0 lead over Rik De Voest in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Devilder leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Devilder won the 2006 Mumbai third round 6-4 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 46
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 46
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2008* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q3 | Clay | Nicolas Devilder | 6-3 6-3 | Rik De Voest | Match data |
| Sep 28, 2006* | Mumbai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Nicolas Devilder | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | Rik De Voest | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Devilder | #1,071 | #60 | 1,164 | 1,649 | 24 | 47 | 33.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rik De Voest | #1,088 | #110 | 538 | 1,693 | 19 | 38 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Devilder | Rik De Voest | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #198 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #207 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #115 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #73 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2009 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #225 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #236 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #356 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #126 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #204 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |