H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nikolay Davydenko vs Victor Hanescu H2H: 5-0

Nikolay Davydenko holds a 5–0 lead over Victor Hanescu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Nikolay Davydenko leads 3–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2013 Dubai fourth round 6-4 7-6(2).

RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
5 0
5 main draw meetings
ROU Age 44 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 28, 2013* Dubai ATP 500 R16 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #46 6-4 7-6(2) Victor Hanescu #58 Match data
Jan 2, 2013* Doha ATP 250 R32 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #44 6-2 6-3 Victor Hanescu #62 Match data
Jul 25, 2009* Hamburg ATP 500 QF Clay Nikolay Davydenko #12 6-3 4-6 6-3 Victor Hanescu #31 Match data
Sep 30, 2004* Palermo ATP 250 R32 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #43 6-2 7-5 Victor Hanescu #87 Match data
Apr 30, 2004* Munich ATP 250 R16 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #60 6-7(6) 6-2 6-4 Victor Hanescu #63 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21
Victor Hanescu #1,025 #26 1,671 1,843 186 226 45.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Victor Hanescu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0
20 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0 2002 3–3 50.0% #172 1,520 0 0
21 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0 2003 13–12 52.0% #70 1,667 0 0
22 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2 2004 17–23 42.5% #92 1,572 0 0
23 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4 2005 25–22 53.2% #35 1,727 0 0
24 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5 2006 0–6 0.0% #646 1,652 0 0
25 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10 2007 7–7 50.0% #76 1,683 0 0
26 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11 2008 20–21 48.8% #50 1,756 0 1
27 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14 2009 26–30 46.4% #48 1,705 0 1
28 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19 2010 23–24 48.9% #51 1,706 0 1
29 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20 2011 16–24 40.0% #90 1,687 0 1
30 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21 2012 6–13 31.6% #62 1,618 0 1
31 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21 2013 18–25 41.9% #80 1,689 0 1
32 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21 2014 11–15 42.3% #122 1,735 0 1
33 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21 2015 1–1 50.0% #279 1,655 0 1