H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Novak Djokovic vs Victor Hanescu H2H: 7-0

Novak Djokovic holds a 7–0 lead over Victor Hanescu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 4–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2014 Indian Wells Masters second round 7-6(1) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Novak Djokovic
Serbia Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
7 – 0
7 main draw meetings
Victor Hanescu
ROU Age 44 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 9, 2014* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Novak Djokovic #2 7-6(1) 6-2 Victor Hanescu #87 Match data
May 26, 2011* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Novak Djokovic #2 6-4 6-1 2-3 (ret.) Victor Hanescu #60 Match data
Aug 13, 2010* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Novak Djokovic #2 6-3 6-4 Victor Hanescu #54 Match data
May 30, 2010* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Novak Djokovic #3 6-3 3-6 6-3 6-2 Victor Hanescu #37 Match data
Oct 8, 2009* Beijing ATP 500 R32 Hard Novak Djokovic #4 6-3 7-5 Victor Hanescu #27 Match data
Oct 15, 2008* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Novak Djokovic #3 6-7(8) 7-6(6) 3-1 (ret.) Victor Hanescu #73 Match data
Nov 2, 2005* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Carpet Novak Djokovic #85 4-1 (ret.) Victor Hanescu #37 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Novak Djokovic #7 #1 16,950 2,593 1,122 223 83.4% 24 40 7 14 15 100
Victor Hanescu #1,025 #26 1,671 1,843 186 226 45.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Novak Djokovic Victor Hanescu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 1–3 25.0% #186 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2005 9–9 50.0% #78 1,732 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2006 35–17 67.3% #16 1,884 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 2007 65–19 77.4% #3 2,067 0 7 2002 3–3 50.0% #172 1,520 0 0
21 2008 58–15 79.5% #3 2,120 1 11 2003 13–12 52.0% #70 1,667 0 0
22 2009 78–17 82.1% #3 2,267 1 16 2004 17–23 42.5% #92 1,572 0 0
23 2010 56–18 75.7% #3 2,166 1 18 2005 25–22 53.2% #35 1,727 0 0
24 2011 72–6 92.3% #1 2,357 4 28 2006 0–6 0.0% #646 1,652 0 0
25 2012 71–10 87.7% #1 2,429 5 34 2007 7–7 50.0% #76 1,683 0 0
26 2013 67–9 88.2% #2 2,469 6 41 2008 20–21 48.8% #50 1,756 0 1
27 2014 65–8 89.0% #1 2,463 7 48 2009 26–30 46.4% #48 1,705 0 1
28 2015 82–6 93.2% #1 2,554 10 59 2010 23–24 48.9% #51 1,706 0 1
29 2016 64–8 88.9% #2 2,450 12 66 2011 16–24 40.0% #90 1,687 0 1
30 2017 31–8 79.5% #12 2,293 12 68 2012 6–13 31.6% #62 1,618 0 1
31 2018 53–12 81.5% #1 2,332 14 72 2013 18–25 41.9% #80 1,689 0 1
32 2019 55–11 83.3% #2 2,264 16 77 2014 11–15 42.3% #122 1,735 0 1
33 2020 35–5 87.5% #1 2,275 17 81 2015 1–1 50.0% #279 1,655 0 1
34 2021 46–5 90.2% #1 2,372 20 86 — — — — — — —
35 2022 42–6 87.5% #5 2,368 21 91 — — — — — — —
36 2023 54–6 90.0% #1 2,405 24 98 — — — — — — —
37 2024 29–9 76.3% #7 2,226 24 98 — — — — — — —
38 2025 39–11 78.0% #4 2,174 24 100 — — — — — — —
39 2026 15–5 75.0% #7 2,155 24 100 — — — — — — —