H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Pablo Andujar vs Victor Hanescu H2H: 1-3

Victor Hanescu holds a 3–1 lead over Pablo Andujar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Victor Hanescu leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Victor Hanescu won the 2014 Swedish Open first round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pablo Andujar
ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Victor Hanescu
ROU Age 45 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Victor Hanescu #104 6-4 6-4 Pablo Andujar #75 Match data Jul 10, 2014* R32 Swedish Open ATP 250 Clay
Pablo Andujar #36 6-1 2-6 1-6 6-3 6-1 Victor Hanescu #146 Match data May 29, 2012* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Victor Hanescu #93 6-3 4-6 7-6(4) Pablo Andujar #48 Match data Feb 23, 2012* R32 Argentina Open ATP 250 Clay
Victor Hanescu #59 6-3 1-6 7-6(2) Pablo Andujar #106 Match data Jul 17, 2008* R32 Austrian Open Kitzbühel International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pablo Andujar #1,102 #32 1,205 1,862 164 241 40.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Victor Hanescu #1,025 #26 1,671 1,843 187 228 45.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pablo Andujar Victor Hanescu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 2002 3–3 50.0% #172 1,520 0 0
21 2007 3–4 42.9% #146 1,641 0 0 2003 13–12 52.0% #70 1,667 0 0
22 2008 3–6 33.3% #101 1,603 0 0 2004 17–24 41.5% #92 1,560 0 0
23 2009 1–12 7.7% #160 1,527 0 0 2005 25–22 53.2% #35 1,726 0 0
24 2010 8–8 50.0% #71 1,703 0 0 2006 0–6 0.0% #646 1,651 0 0
25 2011 25–28 47.2% #46 1,681 0 1 2007 7–7 50.0% #76 1,683 0 0
26 2012 19–29 39.6% #42 1,647 0 2 2008 21–22 48.8% #50 1,759 0 1
27 2013 18–31 36.7% #48 1,722 0 2 2009 26–30 46.4% #48 1,706 0 1
28 2014 23–22 51.1% #41 1,828 0 3 2010 23–24 48.9% #51 1,706 0 1
29 2015 16–22 42.1% #64 1,789 0 3 2011 16–24 40.0% #90 1,687 0 1
30 2016 1–7 12.5% #432 1,639 0 3 2012 6–13 31.6% #62 1,618 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2013 18–25 41.9% #80 1,688 0 1
32 2018 7–7 50.0% #82 1,659 0 4 2014 11–15 42.3% #122 1,734 0 1
33 2019 15–18 45.5% #64 1,722 0 4 2015 1–1 50.0% #279 1,655 0 1
34 2020 4–12 25.0% #60 1,627 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2021 12–18 40.0% #91 1,739 0 4 — — — — — — —
36 2022 9–13 40.9% #121 1,622 0 4 — — — — — — —
37 2023 0–4 0.0% #1102 1,519 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pablo Andujar Victor Hanescu
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2007 — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 2003 2 3 5 40.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 2004 4 8 12 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2009 0 2 2 0.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2005 7 7 14 50.0% 16 9 25 64.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 2010 1 2 3 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — 2006 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2011 3 11 14 21.4% 22 14 36 61.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — —
26 2012 8 16 24 33.3% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2008 10 14 24 41.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 2013 6 15 21 28.6% 12 14 26 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2009 9 17 26 34.6% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2014 8 12 20 40.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 8 10 18 44.4% 13 13 26 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2015 2 9 11 18.2% 12 10 22 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2011 2 7 9 22.2% 13 15 28 46.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2016 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 1 4 5 20.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 4 14 18 22.2% 14 9 23 60.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
32 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — 2014 4 7 11 36.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
33 2019 6 10 16 37.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1 7 8 12.5% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 4 4 8 50.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 44 105 149 29.5% 117 118 235 49.8% 3 18 21 14.3% — — — — — 52 97 149 34.9% 121 106 227 53.3% 13 19 32 40.6% 1 6 7 14.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 400/405 of Pablo Andujar's and 408/415 of Victor Hanescu's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Pablo Andujar Victor Hanescu
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 5/6 2.8 1.6 60.7% 63.8% 54.1% 61.2% 48.1% 59.8% 38.9%
21 2007 7/7 0.7 1.9 66.3% 64.8% 46.3% 61.1% 30.7% 58.8% 41.0% 2003 25/25 4.1 2.3 65.8% 70.6% 50.5% 63.4% 48.4% 64.0% 36.3%
22 2008 9/9 1.9 3.2 72.5% 63.3% 43.8% 57.9% 48.8% 57.8% 39.0% 2004 40/41 6.5 2.3 67.5% 69.3% 50.8% 63.0% 45.0% 63.2% 35.3%
23 2009 13/13 1.8 3.5 62.9% 60.3% 47.1% 45.6% 27.5% 55.0% 34.6% 2005 47/47 5.5 1.4 68.9% 69.0% 51.8% 70.5% 41.2% 63.4% 36.2%
24 2010 16/16 1.4 2.6 66.3% 63.5% 49.0% 44.1% 41.3% 58.7% 39.0% 2006 6/6 5.2 2.8 64.0% 60.4% 48.5% 47.6% 37.8% 56.3% 33.4%
25 2011 53/53 1.6 2.6 61.4% 64.9% 49.3% 54.6% 47.4% 58.9% 39.6% 2007 12/14 4.3 0.8 72.3% 74.1% 51.9% 69.3% 27.0% 67.9% 34.5%
26 2012 48/48 1.6 4.8 58.7% 63.3% 47.6% 49.6% 43.3% 57.0% 39.4% 2008 40/43 5.6 1.6 69.2% 71.7% 52.4% 60.3% 44.5% 65.6% 33.9%
27 2013 49/49 1.5 3.4 60.1% 65.2% 47.6% 60.0% 42.4% 58.1% 37.2% 2009 56/56 4.6 1.7 69.2% 69.7% 51.5% 62.3% 41.8% 64.0% 36.6%
28 2014 44/45 1.5 2.3 64.7% 64.8% 52.6% 53.6% 43.7% 60.3% 41.1% 2010 47/47 6.2 1.6 71.8% 71.0% 50.9% 60.8% 34.6% 65.3% 35.4%
29 2015 38/38 2.4 2.4 66.9% 64.8% 52.5% 56.2% 42.5% 60.4% 39.3% 2011 40/40 3.9 1.8 67.2% 69.6% 50.1% 47.9% 43.3% 63.3% 36.8%
30 2016 8/8 2.0 2.5 66.8% 65.1% 43.3% 38.1% 50.3% 58.0% 36.1% 2012 19/19 3.3 1.0 72.5% 65.7% 48.9% 58.7% 41.8% 61.5% 34.7%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 43/43 3.6 1.1 70.4% 68.7% 50.1% 56.0% 37.4% 63.3% 34.7%
32 2018 14/14 1.1 2.1 66.5% 63.1% 50.9% 49.9% 42.9% 58.9% 43.1% 2014 26/26 3.6 1.7 70.6% 67.4% 44.8% 59.5% 35.3% 60.8% 34.8%
33 2019 32/33 1.8 3.1 65.0% 65.9% 46.8% 53.4% 38.3% 59.2% 37.7% 2015 2/2 8.0 1.0 62.6% 80.9% 60.3% 80.0% 25.0% 73.0% 34.6%
34 2020 16/16 1.0 3.8 62.3% 65.9% 47.8% 56.9% 39.8% 59.2% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 28/30 2.2 4.5 63.7% 64.8% 45.8% 57.7% 44.1% 57.9% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 21/22 1.2 4.5 65.1% 63.6% 45.5% 54.4% 47.8% 57.4% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 4/4 0.5 4.5 63.6% 49.1% 41.5% 39.5% 41.7% 46.7% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 400/405 1.6 3.3 63.4% 64.3% 48.4% 53.8% 42.9% 58.4% 39.0% — 408/415 4.8 1.6 69.1% 69.5% 50.6% 60.6% 40.7% 63.7% 35.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pablo Andujar Victor Hanescu
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 2006 1500 97.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1520 111.3 -1.52 +0.27 0.969 49.8% — +31 — 45.5% +0.18 0–1 1–0 — +0.18
21 2007 1641 120.5 -0.88 +0.96 0.993 49.9% — +64 — 38.5% -0.31 0–1 0–1 — -0.13 2003 1667 132.9 +1.94 -0.77 1.011 50.6% -105 +5 -57 53.1% +0.31 2–3 (40%) 4–6 (40%) 98.4 -0.42
22 2008 1603 123.0 -1.80 +0.19 0.925 48.4% — +131 — 36.0% -0.60 1–1 1–4 (20%) — -0.07 2004 1560 128.8 -0.24 -1.30 0.958 49.7% -32 +93 +47 46.5% -0.03 6–8 (43%) 8–15 (35%) 97.3 +0.44
23 2009 1528 112.1 -4.44 -1.83 0.769 45.0% — +94 +15 21.9% -2.16 0–3 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 97.7 -0.45 2005 1726 141.2 +1.10 -0.69 0.991 50.2% -160 +87 -103 53.4% +0.33 9–6 (60%) 8–13 (38%) 102.6 -1.50
24 2010 1704 127.5 -2.91 -0.31 0.944 48.7% -298 +150 — 50.0% -0.15 3–4 (43%) 3–1 (75%) 101.0 +0.67 2006 1652 114.7 -3.84 +0.04 0.766 45.3% -130 — — 27.8% -1.22 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.83
25 2011 1682 142.1 -3.31 +1.86 0.963 49.5% -262 +224 -224 45.8% -0.28 7–4 (64%) 5–8 (38%) 104.8 +1.11 2007 1684 130.9 +2.01 -1.85 1.073 50.8% — +100 — 45.2% -0.61 1–2 (33%) 6–2 (75%) 101.0 -0.76
26 2012 1648 141.7 -4.98 +1.68 0.916 48.1% -112 +167 — 42.7% -0.66 7–11 (39%) 11–7 (61%) 102.9 +2.10 2008 1759 132.7 +1.60 -1.73 0.986 49.9% -112 +21 -132 48.6% -0.22 8–8 (50%) 16–11 (59%) 105.5 +0.07
27 2013 1723 143.9 -4.35 +0.71 0.886 47.8% -86 +64 — 36.5% -0.90 7–10 (41%) 4–10 (29%) 95.1 +0.42 2009 1707 142.8 +0.72 -0.19 1.018 50.3% -92 +118 -52 49.3% +0.07 7–9 (44%) 8–13 (38%) 97.5 +0.84
28 2014 1829 154.7 -2.21 +3.99 1.033 50.6% -119 +88 — 50.0% +0.07 5–8 (38%) 1–10 (9%) 92.0 -0.85 2010 1707 144.8 +1.68 -1.00 1.022 50.3% -64 +74 -20 50.8% -0.01 6–9 (40%) 13–12 (52%) 99.5 +1.47
29 2015 1789 148.0 -2.34 +2.40 0.992 49.7% -168 +142 -303 46.9% -0.13 6–9 (40%) 6–7 (46%) 98.0 -1.10 2011 1688 139.6 +0.41 -0.16 1.005 49.9% -77 +67 +2 44.4% -0.26 5–10 (33%) 9–9 (50%) 99.1 -1.38
30 2016 1639 110.7 -2.76 -0.49 0.860 47.0% -100 +213 — 22.2% -1.78 1–1 0–2 — -0.18 2012 1618 128.5 -0.92 -2.05 0.900 48.2% -12 +62 — 33.3% -1.04 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 95.6 +0.65
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1688 146.6 +0.21 -1.64 0.946 48.9% -114 +151 — 37.8% -0.70 2–6 (25%) 8–14 (36%) 93.7 -0.88
32 2018 1660 127.2 -1.98 +4.21 1.049 50.8% — +129 — 53.3% +0.33 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 96.4 +0.39 2014 1735 145.7 -1.09 -0.75 0.889 48.4% -68 +108 — 43.9% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 103.9 -1.73
33 2019 1723 140.9 -4.05 +1.79 0.922 48.3% -109 +105 — 43.9% -0.55 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 106.5 -0.59 2015 1655 110.2 +1.39 -2.44 1.279 52.9% — — — 50.0% +0.25 — — — -0.07
34 2020 1628 133.5 -2.24 +0.41 0.940 48.4% -53 +127 — 32.5% -0.97 0–5 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 94.2 -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1739 137.5 -4.15 +2.05 0.926 48.8% -128 +66 — 45.9% -0.36 6–8 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 100.4 -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 1622 128.4 -3.35 +0.90 0.912 48.5% +5 +51 — 45.5% -0.49 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 98.4 +1.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1520 95.2 -4.98 -1.21 0.672 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.17 — — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1862 143.7 -3.41 +1.63 0.938 48.7% -123 +126 -195 42.7% -0.51 51–75 (40%) 52–67 (44%) 95.7 +0.55 — 1843 144.0 +0.61 -0.96 0.980 49.8% -93 +83 -39 46.7% -0.17 52–74 (41%) 90–107 (46%) 97.3 -0.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.