H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Pablo Cuevas vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 1-0

Pablo Cuevas holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pablo Cuevas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pablo Cuevas won the 2016 Monte-Carlo Masters first round 7-6(2) 6-7(2) 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pablo Cuevas
URU Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pablo Cuevas #25 7-6(2) 6-7(2) 7-6(4) Daniel Gimeno-Traver #131 Match data Apr 12, 2016* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Pablo Cuevas #107 6-2 7-6(3) Daniel Gimeno-Traver #91 Match data Jul 19, 2009 Q2 Q Hamburg Open ATP 500 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pablo Cuevas #841 #19 1,865 1,960 212 213 49.9% 0 0 0 1 5 6
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pablo Cuevas Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
21 2007 0–1 0.0% #113 1,551 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2008 8–13 38.1% #142 1,633 0 0 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2009 18–15 54.5% #50 1,745 0 0 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0
24 2010 20–22 47.6% #63 1,760 0 0 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0
25 2011 11–13 45.8% #142 1,743 0 0 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 2013 2–4 33.3% #220 1,716 0 0 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2014 17–12 58.6% #30 1,843 0 2 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0
29 2015 28–25 52.8% #40 1,815 0 3 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0
30 2016 34–23 59.6% #22 1,810 0 5 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0
31 2017 20–21 48.8% #32 1,787 0 6 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0
32 2018 13–14 48.1% #88 1,766 0 6 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0
33 2019 22–23 48.9% #45 1,741 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 2020 7–10 41.2% #67 1,691 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 2021 9–11 45.0% #97 1,651 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 2022 3–6 33.3% #269 1,654 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pablo Cuevas Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
21 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1 2 3 33.3% 7 11 18 38.9% — — — — 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — —
23 2009 5 6 11 45.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 2010 8 9 17 47.1% 12 13 25 48.0% — — — — 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2011 3 4 7 42.9% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — —
27 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 2014 4 5 9 44.4% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2015 8 13 21 38.1% 19 9 28 67.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 2016 9 13 22 40.9% 21 8 29 72.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — —
31 2017 6 11 17 35.3% 14 10 24 58.3% — — — — 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2018 4 3 7 57.1% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2019 3 9 12 25.0% 18 12 30 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1 3 4 25.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 3 3 6 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 56 86 142 39.4% 149 116 265 56.2% 7 11 18 38.9% — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 421/425 of Pablo Cuevas's and 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Pablo Cuevas Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5%
21 2007 1/1 1.0 5.0 43.6% 50.0% 40.9% 58.8% 14.3% 44.9% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 21/21 4.1 1.9 59.3% 63.2% 54.4% 55.2% 37.5% 59.5% 35.1% 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4%
23 2009 33/33 7.5 2.2 63.6% 72.0% 51.8% 60.2% 47.4% 64.8% 34.6% 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4%
24 2010 41/42 4.7 2.2 61.6% 68.2% 47.5% 50.4% 40.6% 60.3% 37.2% 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4%
25 2011 24/24 5.4 1.7 59.8% 72.3% 56.0% 58.0% 41.2% 65.9% 37.8% 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2%
27 2013 6/6 5.8 4.0 57.6% 69.0% 46.5% 67.5% 32.5% 59.5% 31.7% 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1%
28 2014 29/29 5.7 3.1 60.1% 72.0% 52.7% 47.6% 37.7% 64.2% 39.5% 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1%
29 2015 53/53 5.8 2.8 60.5% 71.4% 52.5% 64.8% 42.6% 63.7% 37.5% 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5%
30 2016 55/57 7.6 2.9 60.3% 75.8% 55.2% 62.3% 42.7% 67.5% 36.5% 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0%
31 2017 41/41 5.3 3.6 59.0% 72.6% 51.0% 59.7% 42.4% 63.7% 36.3% 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0%
32 2018 27/27 6.2 3.3 60.2% 74.3% 55.2% 57.1% 37.9% 66.4% 36.6% 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1%
33 2019 45/45 5.5 3.0 58.9% 74.2% 52.7% 54.8% 44.8% 65.5% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 17/17 5.9 3.5 60.3% 70.5% 49.4% 60.5% 33.6% 62.2% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 20/20 4.8 2.5 68.9% 70.3% 50.2% 58.6% 43.1% 63.8% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 8/9 2.8 1.9 66.8% 67.4% 53.2% 60.2% 47.2% 63.3% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 421/425 5.8 2.8 60.8% 71.7% 52.3% 58.1% 41.6% 64.1% 36.6% — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pablo Cuevas Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11
21 2007 1551 110.8 +3.13 +0.76 0.628 39.7% — — — 0.0% -4.33 — — — -0.20 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1633 124.3 -1.73 -1.88 0.867 47.8% +1 -44 — 37.5% -0.81 2–2 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 100.8 -0.48 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.20
23 2009 1745 137.5 +0.89 -2.33 0.983 50.1% -71 +96 — 55.4% +0.08 6–6 (50%) 7–2 (78%) 105.5 +1.03 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 -1.24
24 2010 1761 136.7 -1.96 -0.08 0.937 48.6% -45 +38 — 48.9% -0.46 4–4 (50%) 15–2 (88%) 107.8 +0.76 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) 101.8 -1.95
25 2011 1743 138.9 +2.31 +0.26 1.110 51.3% -28 +9 — 52.6% +0.12 2–7 (22%) 6–4 (60%) 96.2 -0.08 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) 95.4 -0.72
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 +0.11
27 2013 1717 114.3 -1.40 -3.04 0.783 46.7% -23 — — 43.8% -1.13 1–1 1–1 — +0.05 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 95.0 +0.22
28 2014 1843 147.6 +0.35 +2.31 1.103 51.7% -117 +98 — 54.7% +0.27 7–6 (54%) 7–5 (58%) 104.8 +0.40 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 -0.44
29 2015 1815 156.3 +0.03 +1.37 1.032 50.7% -98 +211 -198 50.7% +0.06 9–11 (45%) 10–13 (43%) 96.1 +0.40 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.8 +0.04
30 2016 1810 152.1 +3.77 +0.09 1.125 51.7% -111 +203 -133 57.5% +0.44 12–10 (55%) 19–20 (49%) 98.9 +2.40 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 +1.22
31 2017 1788 154.1 +0.80 -0.10 0.998 49.9% -91 +130 — 47.6% -0.14 9–7 (56%) 9–12 (43%) 100.8 +1.79 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07
32 2018 1767 142.3 +1.63 +0.47 1.090 51.2% -24 +67 — 47.0% +0.24 4–4 (50%) 6–14 (30%) 93.3 +0.81 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
33 2019 1741 144.0 +1.27 -0.02 1.050 50.6% -34 +106 -89 49.1% +0.03 7–8 (47%) 9–8 (53%) 97.5 +0.69 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1692 131.9 -0.42 -0.37 0.941 48.8% -54 +121 — 42.6% -0.34 3–4 (43%) 3–6 (33%) 96.3 -0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1652 127.3 +0.69 -1.10 0.984 49.6% -2 +108 — 45.1% -0.25 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 99.3 -0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 1654 112.6 +0.30 -1.95 1.017 50.8% — +63 — 41.7% -0.08 1–2 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 96.3 +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1612 96.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 1580 89.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1960 148.4 +0.77 -0.05 1.019 50.3% -70 +102 -143 49.9% -0.03 68–74 (48%) 100–95 (51%) 98.5 +1.59 — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.