H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Pablo Cuevas vs Denis Kudla H2H: 0-1
Denis Kudla holds a 1–0 lead over Pablo Cuevas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Denis Kudla leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Denis Kudla won the 2015 Wimbledon first round 6-7(4) 4-6 6-3 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
URU
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2015* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Denis Kudla | 6-7(4) 4-6 6-3 6-2 6-2 | Pablo Cuevas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pablo Cuevas | #841 | #19 | 1,865 | 1,960 | 211 | 212 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Denis Kudla | #1,269 | #53 | 858 | 1,836 | 71 | 131 | 35.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pablo Cuevas | Denis Kudla | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #496 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #276 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #137 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #114 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #121 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #142 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #69 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #50 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #131 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #142 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #63 | 1,789 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #114 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #105 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #40 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #106 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2016 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 | 2023 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #163 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #32 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 | 2024 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #267 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2018 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #88 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2019 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #45 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #67 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #97 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2022 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #269 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |