H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Pablo Cuevas vs Tobias Kamke H2H: 1-0

Pablo Cuevas holds a 1–0 lead over Tobias Kamke in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pablo Cuevas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pablo Cuevas won the 2016 Roland Garros first round 3-6 6-2 6-3 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pablo Cuevas
URU Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Tobias Kamke
GER Age 40 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pablo Cuevas #27 3-6 6-2 6-3 7-6(4) Tobias Kamke #155 Match data May 24, 2016* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pablo Cuevas #841 #19 1,865 1,960 212 213 49.9% 0 0 0 1 5 6
Tobias Kamke #1,114 #64 744 1,766 62 101 38.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pablo Cuevas Tobias Kamke
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 2007 0–1 0.0% #113 1,551 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #210 1,502 0 0
22 2008 8–13 38.1% #142 1,633 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #243 1,508 0 0
23 2009 18–15 54.5% #50 1,745 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2010 20–22 47.6% #63 1,760 0 0 2010 7–8 46.7% #67 1,639 0 0
25 2011 11–13 45.8% #142 1,743 0 0 2011 15–23 39.5% #96 1,738 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2012 6–18 25.0% #98 1,628 0 0
27 2013 2–4 33.3% #220 1,716 0 0 2013 17–21 44.7% #74 1,731 0 0
28 2014 17–12 58.6% #30 1,843 0 2 2014 9–16 36.0% #97 1,669 0 0
29 2015 28–25 52.8% #40 1,815 0 3 2015 1–5 16.7% #277 1,583 0 0
30 2016 34–23 59.6% #22 1,810 0 5 2016 5–5 50.0% #118 1,707 0 0
31 2017 20–21 48.8% #32 1,787 0 6 2017 2–2 50.0% #233 1,617 0 0
32 2018 13–14 48.1% #88 1,766 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 2019 22–23 48.9% #45 1,741 0 6 2019 0–1 0.0% #242 1,566 0 0
34 2020 7–10 41.2% #67 1,691 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 2021 9–11 45.0% #97 1,651 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 2022 3–6 33.3% #269 1,654 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pablo Cuevas Tobias Kamke
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1 2 3 33.3% 7 11 18 38.9% — — — — 2008 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2009 5 6 11 45.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 8 9 17 47.1% 12 13 25 48.0% — — — — 2010 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 2011 3 4 7 42.9% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — 2011 7 14 21 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 5 11 16 31.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2013 10 11 21 47.6% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2014 4 5 9 44.4% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 4 10 14 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 2015 8 13 21 38.1% 19 9 28 67.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2015 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2016 9 13 22 40.9% 21 8 29 72.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 2016 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2017 6 11 17 35.3% 14 10 24 58.3% — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
32 2018 4 3 7 57.1% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 3 9 12 25.0% 18 12 30 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1 3 4 25.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 3 3 6 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 56 86 142 39.4% 149 116 265 56.2% 7 11 18 38.9% — 35 61 96 36.5% 16 27 43 37.2% 11 13 24 45.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 421/425 of Pablo Cuevas's and 163/163 of Tobias Kamke's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Pablo Cuevas Tobias Kamke
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2007 1/1 1.0 5.0 43.6% 50.0% 40.9% 58.8% 14.3% 44.9% 34.6% 2007 1/1 0.0 6.0 47.2% 56.0% 35.7% 16.7% — 45.3% 17.6%
22 2008 21/21 4.1 1.9 59.3% 63.2% 54.4% 55.2% 37.5% 59.5% 35.1% 2008 1/1 3.0 11.0 58.3% 64.9% 45.3% 25.0% 33.3% 56.7% 30.1%
23 2009 33/33 7.5 2.2 63.6% 72.0% 51.8% 60.2% 47.4% 64.8% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 41/42 4.7 2.2 61.6% 68.2% 47.5% 50.4% 40.6% 60.3% 37.2% 2010 15/15 1.8 3.3 59.0% 65.8% 48.0% 56.5% 35.6% 58.8% 39.1%
25 2011 24/24 5.4 1.7 59.8% 72.3% 56.0% 58.0% 41.2% 65.9% 37.8% 2011 38/38 2.3 3.5 57.2% 65.9% 50.9% 55.5% 39.3% 59.5% 38.5%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 24/24 1.4 4.6 57.4% 61.6% 45.8% 47.2% 39.2% 54.8% 40.4%
27 2013 6/6 5.8 4.0 57.6% 69.0% 46.5% 67.5% 32.5% 59.5% 31.7% 2013 38/38 2.2 2.6 60.4% 66.9% 49.5% 60.7% 46.9% 60.0% 39.2%
28 2014 29/29 5.7 3.1 60.1% 72.0% 52.7% 47.6% 37.7% 64.2% 39.5% 2014 25/25 2.4 3.3 61.0% 66.2% 51.7% 60.8% 36.4% 60.4% 34.6%
29 2015 53/53 5.8 2.8 60.5% 71.4% 52.5% 64.8% 42.6% 63.7% 37.5% 2015 6/6 2.2 2.5 56.5% 61.9% 46.0% 38.6% 45.4% 54.5% 37.5%
30 2016 55/57 7.6 2.9 60.3% 75.8% 55.2% 62.3% 42.7% 67.5% 36.5% 2016 10/10 1.0 3.1 61.2% 64.4% 50.3% 45.7% 44.5% 58.8% 39.3%
31 2017 41/41 5.3 3.6 59.0% 72.6% 51.0% 59.7% 42.4% 63.7% 36.3% 2017 4/4 2.3 3.5 57.0% 73.4% 51.3% 60.9% 58.5% 64.2% 39.7%
32 2018 27/27 6.2 3.3 60.2% 74.3% 55.2% 57.1% 37.9% 66.4% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 45/45 5.5 3.0 58.9% 74.2% 52.7% 54.8% 44.8% 65.5% 36.2% 2019 1/1 0.0 8.0 46.4% 66.7% 44.1% 60.0% 33.3% 54.5% 29.6%
34 2020 17/17 5.9 3.5 60.3% 70.5% 49.4% 60.5% 33.6% 62.2% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 20/20 4.8 2.5 68.9% 70.3% 50.2% 58.6% 43.1% 63.8% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 8/9 2.8 1.9 66.8% 67.4% 53.2% 60.2% 47.2% 63.3% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 421/425 5.8 2.8 60.8% 71.7% 52.3% 58.1% 41.6% 64.1% 36.6% — 163/163 2.0 3.4 58.8% 65.4% 49.3% 54.9% 41.0% 58.7% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pablo Cuevas Tobias Kamke
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 2007 1551 110.8 +3.13 +0.76 0.628 39.7% — — — 0.0% -4.33 — — — -0.20 2007 1502 102.7 +1.52 -1.81 0.323 34.5% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.07
22 2008 1633 124.3 -1.73 -1.88 0.867 47.8% +1 -44 — 37.5% -0.81 2–2 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 100.8 -0.48 2008 1509 105.8 +1.11 -1.95 0.695 44.2% — — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.07
23 2009 1745 137.5 +0.89 -2.33 0.983 50.1% -71 +96 — 55.4% +0.08 6–6 (50%) 7–2 (78%) 105.5 +1.03 2009 1457 96.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 1761 136.7 -1.96 -0.08 0.937 48.6% -45 +38 — 48.9% -0.46 4–4 (50%) 15–2 (88%) 107.8 +0.76 2010 1639 126.8 -1.68 +1.56 0.949 48.8% -130 -61 +94 46.3% -0.29 1–1 0–1 — -0.29
25 2011 1743 138.9 +2.31 +0.26 1.110 51.3% -28 +9 — 52.6% +0.12 2–7 (22%) 6–4 (60%) 96.2 -0.08 2011 1738 134.7 -2.56 +1.09 0.951 49.1% -78 -127 +18 42.4% -0.27 1–8 (11%) 3–9 (25%) 89.6 +0.04
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1629 130.3 -5.44 +2.38 0.893 47.6% -3 -69 — 33.9% -1.11 1–6 (14%) 1–4 (20%) 91.7 -0.37
27 2013 1717 114.3 -1.40 -3.04 0.783 46.7% -23 — — 43.8% -1.13 1–1 1–1 — +0.05 2013 1731 143.6 -2.58 +2.05 0.978 50.0% +2 -95 -37 48.9% +0.08 4–6 (40%) 6–3 (67%) 102.2 -0.29
28 2014 1843 147.6 +0.35 +2.31 1.103 51.7% -117 +98 — 54.7% +0.27 7–6 (54%) 7–5 (58%) 104.8 +0.40 2014 1669 132.2 -3.08 -1.17 0.873 48.0% -24 -5 +60 42.6% -0.69 3–7 (30%) 6–5 (55%) 99.9 +0.69
29 2015 1815 156.3 +0.03 +1.37 1.032 50.7% -98 +211 -198 50.7% +0.06 9–11 (45%) 10–13 (43%) 96.1 +0.40 2015 1583 117.3 -3.20 +0.43 0.825 46.0% -7 — — 25.0% -1.69 1–1 1–1 — -0.03
30 2016 1810 152.1 +3.77 +0.09 1.125 51.7% -111 +203 -133 57.5% +0.44 12–10 (55%) 19–20 (49%) 98.9 +2.40 2016 1707 126.4 -2.95 +1.32 0.953 49.2% -8 — — 47.8% -0.17 1–0 3–3 (50%) — +0.76
31 2017 1788 154.1 +0.80 -0.10 0.998 49.9% -91 +130 — 47.6% -0.14 9–7 (56%) 9–12 (43%) 100.8 +1.79 2017 1618 113.4 +0.68 +0.45 1.108 51.9% — — +97 55.6% +0.33 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.10
32 2018 1767 142.3 +1.63 +0.47 1.090 51.2% -24 +67 — 47.0% +0.24 4–4 (50%) 6–14 (30%) 93.3 +0.81 2018 1543 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1741 144.0 +1.27 -0.02 1.050 50.6% -34 +106 -89 49.1% +0.03 7–8 (47%) 9–8 (53%) 97.5 +0.69 2019 1567 110.3 -0.77 -0.97 0.651 42.8% — — — 25.0% -2.25 — — — -0.04
34 2020 1692 131.9 -0.42 -0.37 0.941 48.8% -54 +121 — 42.6% -0.34 3–4 (43%) 3–6 (33%) 96.3 -0.62 2020 1532 92.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1652 127.3 +0.69 -1.10 0.984 49.6% -2 +108 — 45.1% -0.25 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 99.3 -0.71 2021 1492 104.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 1654 112.6 +0.30 -1.95 1.017 50.8% — +63 — 41.7% -0.08 1–2 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 96.3 +0.50 2022 1515 104.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1612 96.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 1580 89.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1960 148.4 +0.77 -0.05 1.019 50.3% -70 +102 -143 49.9% -0.03 68–74 (48%) 100–95 (51%) 98.5 +1.59 — 1766 131.0 -2.90 +1.13 0.926 48.7% -32 -76 +38 42.4% -0.48 12–30 (29%) 21–28 (43%) 91.3 +0.26

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.