H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Patrick Proisy vs Ray Ruffels H2H: 0-1
Ray Ruffels holds a 1–0 lead over Patrick Proisy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ray Ruffels leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ray Ruffels won the 1969 Haverford third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 76
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 80
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 1969* | Haverford | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Ray Ruffels | 6-4 6-2 | Patrick Proisy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Proisy | #232 | #23 | 0 | 1,876 | 220 | 193 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ray Ruffels | #482 | #27 | 0 | 1,903 | 246 | 207 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patrick Proisy | Ray Ruffels | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 27–18 | 60.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1972 | 36–21 | 63.2% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 41–19 | 68.3% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1973 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #41 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 35–21 | 62.5% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1974 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #69 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 35–22 | 61.4% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1975 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 32–32 | 50.0% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1976 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #104 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1977 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #44 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,773 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1978 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #76 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1979 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #93 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #112 | 1,692 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1980 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #158 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,782 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,699 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,617 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,544 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #482 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 |