H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Petr Korda vs Emilio Sanchez H2H: 1-1
Petr Korda and Emilio Sanchez are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Petr Korda leads 1–0 on grass, while Emilio Sanchez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emilio Sanchez won the 1992 US Open first round 6-2 4-6 2-6 6-1 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 58
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 1992* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Emilio Sanchez | 6-2 4-6 2-6 6-1 7-6(4) | Petr Korda | Match data |
| Jun 24, 1988* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Petr Korda | 7-6 6-3 3-6 0-6 6-1 | Emilio Sanchez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petr Korda | #1,382 | #2 | 3,499 | 2,110 | 378 | 238 | 61.4% | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 10 |
| Emilio Sanchez | #1,301 | #7 | 1,634 | 2,038 | 402 | 272 | 59.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Petr Korda | Emilio Sanchez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #794 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #87 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #188 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #64 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 13–8 | 61.9% | #59 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1990 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #38 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #17 | 1,870 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1991 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #9 | 1,922 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #17 | 1,907 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1992 | 57–28 | 67.1% | #7 | 1,940 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 37–16 | 69.8% | #19 | 1,871 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1993 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #12 | 1,954 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,812 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1994 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #18 | 1,838 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #14 | 1,823 | 0 | 14 |
| 27 | 1995 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #41 | 1,801 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #21 | 1,783 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 1996 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #24 | 1,904 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #41 | 1,686 | 0 | 15 |
| 29 | 1997 | 52–24 | 68.4% | #13 | 1,976 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #74 | 1,628 | 0 | 15 |
| 30 | 1998 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #13 | 1,777 | 1 | 10 | 1995 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,587 | 0 | 15 |
| 31 | 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #170 | 1,674 | 1 | 10 | 1996 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #173 | 1,505 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1056 | 1,467 | 0 | 15 |