H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Petr Korda vs Gilad Bloom H2H: 1-2
Gilad Bloom holds a 2–1 lead over Petr Korda in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Gilad Bloom leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Gilad Bloom won the 1990 Wimbledon first round 6-0 6-4 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 58
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 59
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 1990* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Gilad Bloom | 6-0 6-4 4-6 6-2 | Petr Korda | Match data |
| Mar 1, 1990* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Petr Korda | 6-1 6-4 | Gilad Bloom | Match data |
| Aug 31, 1988* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Gilad Bloom | 4-6 6-4 3-0 (ret.) | Petr Korda | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petr Korda | #1,382 | #2 | 3,499 | 2,110 | 378 | 238 | 61.4% | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 10 |
| Gilad Bloom | #1,295 | #61 | 524 | 1,750 | 82 | 103 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Petr Korda | Gilad Bloom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #794 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #385 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #452 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #87 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #152 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #188 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 13–8 | 61.9% | #59 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #210 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #38 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #105 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #9 | 1,922 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 57–28 | 67.1% | #7 | 1,940 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #12 | 1,954 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #137 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1994 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #18 | 1,838 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1995 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #41 | 1,801 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #217 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1996 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #24 | 1,904 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1997 | 52–24 | 68.4% | #13 | 1,976 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1998 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #13 | 1,777 | 1 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #170 | 1,674 | 1 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |